Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Elon Musk On Why First Moon Landing Was An 'Anomaly'
benzinga.com ^ | 11/27/2022 | Shivdeep Dhaliwal

Posted on 11/29/2022 7:29:23 PM PST by bitt

SpaceX and Tesla Inc TSLA CEO Elon Musk said recently that the 1969 Apollo 11 Moon-landing mission was an “anomalous situation.”

What Happened: “The fact that we were able to go to the Moon in '69 was such an anomalous situation, it was like reaching into the future and bringing the technology forward,” said Musk on the "Full Send" podcast.

The landings, which saw Neil Armstrong become the first human to step on the lunar surface, were “not the natural pace of technology development,” according to the SpaceX founder.

“It’s just that the United States just collectively decided that this has got to be done,” Musk said, referring to the space race between the U.S. and the Soviet Union.

Why It Matters: Musk agreed with the podcast hosts that it was “weird” that the U.S. had not returned to the Moon’s surface since 1972.

"We’ll go to the Moon, SpaceX has an asset contract to take astronauts to the Moon," Musk said, adding that SpaceX’s super-heavy-lift launch vehicle Starship is “gigantic compared to anything that’s been done before.”

“It’s capable of putting 100 tons of payload on the Moon. You could build a Moon base with a Starship.”

Musk said, “We could go way beyond what was done with the Apollo program, where they had a small lander.”

SpaceX would take astronauts to the Moon before it took them to Mars, the billionaire entrepreneur said.

"I think we should build a city on the Moon and on Mars."


TOPICS: Astronomy; Business/Economy; Science; Travel
KEYWORDS: anomaly; apollo; astronomy; elonmusk; mars; moon; moonlanding; musk; science; spaceexploration; spacex; starlink; tesla; themoon
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last

1 posted on 11/29/2022 7:29:23 PM PST by bitt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; AZ .44 MAG; Baynative; bgill; bitt; ...

also see:

https://www.benzinga.com/news/22/08/28370222/elon-musk-says-area-51-not-so-secretive-heres-how-he-plans-to-greet-aliens

Elon Musk On Aliens Asks If Universe Is 13.8B Years Old, Shouldn’t They Be ‘Everywhere?’


2 posted on 11/29/2022 7:30:19 PM PST by bitt (<img src=' 'width=50%>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

“I think we should build a city on the Moon and on Mars.”
= = =

And the roads will be full of electric cars.


3 posted on 11/29/2022 7:31:16 PM PST by Scrambler Bob (My /s is more true than your /science (or you might mean /seance))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Because those were the best of times for America. I want those back.


4 posted on 11/29/2022 7:31:16 PM PST by MarMema (No bugs for consumption)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Stanley Kubrick would disagree. 🤡


5 posted on 11/29/2022 7:33:33 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (The worst thing about censorship is ████ █ ██████ ███████ ███ ██████ ██ ████████.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

No cheese on the Moon is a deal breaker...


6 posted on 11/29/2022 7:35:57 PM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scrambler Bob

Screw the electric cars...I want my FLYING car!


7 posted on 11/29/2022 7:36:42 PM PST by ProtectOurFreedom (If you're not part of the solution, you're just scumming up the bottom of the beaker!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bitt
Musk agreed with the podcast hosts that it was “weird” that the U.S. had not returned to the Moon’s surface since 1972.

Why was it weird? It was expensive, dangerous and a dozen more visits wouldn't have pushed science, commerce or geopolitics forward much. Have we even yet fully exploited the samples we brought back?

Now that China is sniffing around the moon the geopolitical reasons look like they are coming back.

8 posted on 11/29/2022 7:37:41 PM PST by KarlInOhio (Soon the January 6 protesters will be held (without trial or bail) longer than Jefferson Davis was.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

I am old enough to remember watching all of the Apollo missions on TV. It is hard to believe it has been 50 years since the last one. Even harder to believe that we did it using slide rules when the most powerful supercomputers in existence had less computational power than a smartphone.


9 posted on 11/29/2022 7:43:24 PM PST by Bubba_Leroy (Dementia Joe is Not My President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Landed on the moon - and took off to reunited with an orbiting spaceship - AND did it with a collection of computers that together weren’t half as powerful as an iphone.


10 posted on 11/29/2022 7:43:43 PM PST by GOPJ (Unsolved crime? Jump to the conclusion the killer is a LGBTQIA2S+ (Turn about's fair play.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

Yeah, I found plenty of green cheese in the back of my fridge recently.


11 posted on 11/29/2022 7:43:52 PM PST by sevlex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: bitt
Don't Touch the Moon!
I need it for loving.
Don't touch the stars,
I need them, too.
All you frantic scientists,
Find something else to do!
12 posted on 11/29/2022 7:49:26 PM PST by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt
Is keeping people alive on the Moon easier or harder than keeping them alive in the ISS?

If we had a permanent base on the Moon, what would be its purpose? I could see manning a huge telescope or telescope array on the dark side of the moon would be great when it was facing away from the Sun.

If there is something to H3 for fusion, but is that really harvestable in reasonable amounts as in the movie "Moon"?

13 posted on 11/29/2022 7:54:27 PM PST by who_would_fardels_bear (What is left around which to circle the wagons?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

It was “weird” because congress demanded the highest possible scientific and engineering standards, and expense was a distant tertiary consideration.

The reasons were geopolitical, yes, but JFK’s legacy was, I think, equally important.


14 posted on 11/29/2022 7:55:14 PM PST by jimtorr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: bitt

With billions of stars, nearly unlimited planets and endless time the likelihood of life is possible.
But our timing maybe off.Their civilization may have peaked and destroyed itself, others never really grasped technology and died off. Other’s still in their primitive stage.

Or maybe we’re all there is.
One can stare at the starry skies and twist oneself into knots.

I cannot conceive of if you go to the end of the universe, then what’s beyond the end? Infinity, as a concept is hard to wrap one’s mind around. As is different dimensions.
And God could be found in one of them.

Or not!


15 posted on 11/29/2022 7:55:36 PM PST by RedMonqey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Is Helium 3 a legitimate opportunity from the Moon?


16 posted on 11/29/2022 7:56:36 PM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bubba_Leroy

I think along those same lines... the use of the slide rule never ceases to amaze.

I had my trusty Lutz out just a couple of weeks ago.


17 posted on 11/29/2022 8:03:11 PM PST by Clutch Martin ("The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right." )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

They were using slide rules. They did not have computers on board. It was amazing. And they could have died a thousand different ways. It was truly amazing.


18 posted on 11/29/2022 8:04:50 PM PST by poinq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ
AND did it with a collection of computers that together weren’t half as powerful as an iphone.

And that actually vastly overestimates the Apollo computers’ power. An iPhone is more powerful than a 1980s Cray supercomputer. The Apollo computers were no more powerful than a late-1970s programmable calculator.

19 posted on 11/29/2022 8:11:00 PM PST by noiseman (The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: bitt
Why It Matters: Musk agreed with the podcast hosts that it was “weird” that the U.S. had not returned to the Moon’s surface since 1972.

Not weird, LBJ and the democrats crippled us funding the Great Society.

Supporting generations of negro welfare left no money for anything else.

20 posted on 11/29/2022 8:11:48 PM PST by doorgunner69 (Let's go Brandon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson