Posted on 03/19/2018 4:16:16 PM PDT by BenLurkin
A new scenario seeking to explain how Mars putative oceans came and went over the last 4 billion years implies that the oceans formed several hundred million years earlier and were not as deep as once thought.
The early ocean known as Arabia (left, blue) would have looked like this when it formed 4 billion years ago on Mars, while the Deuteronilus ocean, about 3.6 billion years old, had a smaller shoreline. Both coexisted with the massive volcanic province Tharsis, located on the unseen side of the planet, which may have helped support the existence of liquid water. The water is now gone, perhaps frozen underground and partially lost to space, while the ancient seabed is known as the northern plains. Robert Citron images, UC Berkeley.
The proposal by UC Berkeley geophysicists links the existence of oceans early in Mars history to the rise of the solar systems largest volcanic system, Tharsis, and highlights the key role played by global warming in allowing liquid water to exist on Mars.
Volcanoes may be important in creating the conditions for Mars to be wet, said Michael Manga, a UC Berkeley professor of earth and planetary science and senior author of a paper appearing in Nature this week and posted online March 19.
Those claiming that Mars never had oceans of liquid water often point to the fact that estimates of the size of the oceans dont jibe with estimates of how much water could be hidden today as permafrost underground and how much could have escaped into space. These are the main options, given that the polar ice caps dont contain enough water to fill an ocean.
The new model proposes that the oceans formed before or at the same time as Mars largest volcanic feature, Tharsis, instead of after Tharsis formed 3.7 billion years ago. Because Tharsis was smaller at that time, it did not distort the planet as much as it did later, in particular the plains that cover most of the northern hemisphere and are the presumed ancient seabed. The absence of crustal deformation from Tharsis means the seas would have been shallower, holding about half the water of earlier estimates.
The assumption was that Tharsis formed quickly and early, rather than gradually, and that the oceans came later, Manga said. Were saying that the oceans predate and accompany the lava outpourings that made Tharsis.
Its likely, he added, that Tharsis spewed gases into the atmosphere that created a global warming or greenhouse effect that allowed liquid water to exist on the planet, and also that volcanic eruptions created channels that allowed underground water to reach the surface and fill the northern plains.
The model also counters another argument against oceans: that the proposed shorelines are very irregular, varying in height by as much as a kilometer, when they should be level, like shorelines on Earth.
A map of Mars today shows where scientists have identified possible ancient shoreline that may have been etched by intermittent oceans billions of years ago. The irregular elevations of these shorelines can be explained by the growth of the volcanic province called Tharsis some 3.7 billion years ago, which would have deformed the topography and misaligned the shorelines.
Arabia (magenta) is more than 4 million years old, while the Deuteronilus (white) and Isidis (cyan) shoreline are several million years younger. The solid contour lines represent the Tharsis bulge (left) and the antipodal bulge it created (right), with dashed contour lines indicating the depressions in between. Robert Citron images, UC Berkeley.
This irregularity could be explained if the first ocean, called Arabia, started forming about 4 billion years ago and existed, if intermittently, during as much as the first 20 percent of Tharsiss growth. The growing volcano would have depressed the land and deformed the shoreline over time, which could explain the irregular heights of the Arabia shoreline.
Similarly, the irregular shoreline of a subsequent ocean, called Deuteronilus, could be explained if it formed during the last 17 percent of Tharsiss growth, about 3.6 billion years ago.
These shorelines could have been emplaced by a large body of liquid water that existed before and during the emplacement of Tharsis, instead of afterwards, said first author Robert Citron, a UC Berkeley graduate student. Citron will present a paper about the new analysis on March 20 at the annual Lunar and Planetary Science conference in Texas.
Tharsis, now a 5,000-kilometer-wide eruptive complex, contains some of the biggest volcanoes in the solar system and dominates the topography of Mars. Earth, twice the diameter and 10 times more massive than Mars, has no equivalent dominating feature. Tharsiss bulk creates a bulge on the opposite side of the planet and a depression halfway between. This explains why estimates of the volume of water the northern plains could hold based on todays topography are twice what the new study estimates based on the topography 4 billion years ago.
Manga, who models the internal heat flow of Mars, such as the rising plumes of molten rock that erupt into volcanoes at the surface, tried to explain the irregular shorelines of the plains of Mars 11 years ago with another theory. He and former graduate student Taylor Perron suggested that Tharsis, which was then thought to have originated at far northern latitudes, was so massive that it caused the spin axis of Mars to move several thousand miles south, throwing off the shorelines.
Since then, however, others have shown that Tharsis originated only about 20 degrees above the equator, nixing that theory. But Manga and Citron came up with another idea, that the shorelines could have been etched as Tharsis was growing, not afterward. The new theory also can account for the cutting of valley networks by flowing water at around the same time.
This is a hypothesis, Manga emphasized. But scientists can do more precise dating of Tharsis and the shorelines to see if it holds up.
NASAs next Mars lander, the InSight mission (Interior Exploration using Seismic Investigations, Geodesy and Heat Transport), could help answer the question. Scheduled for launch in May, it will place a seismometer on the surface to probe the interior and perhaps find frozen remnants of that ancient ocean, or even liquid water.
Douglas Hemingway, a Miller Postdoctoral Fellow at UC Berkeley, is also a coauthor of the paper. The work was supported by the National Science Foundation.
Oh, how I loved to sail my dinghy on the oceans of Mars.
Surfs Up on Mars!
Global warming?
They had global warming on Mars.
Lets send Al Gore there to look for sad Polar Bears.
With air pressure of about .087 psi, you’ll need some strong winds to set sail ....
Yep.
That looks just like me with some woman trying to grab my sword.
IMHO, it’s “fake news” that Mars ever had water.
When Curiosity landed, it headed straight away for “Yellowknife Bay” where it spent, I guess several months nosing around, but on the way over there, they took a sample from some ditch, or rut, which they happened upon, and then casually announced that they had found some sort of hydrated mineral which showed that this was a ( water ) stream bed, from a few billion years ago, of course.
Never heard much more about it, dunno.
Maybe I’m not the skeptic that you are, but one has to wonder.
( I guess you would call this “aiding and abetting” . )
the atmosphere that created a global warming or...
Those two are the money quotes, with the magic words, that help pay the Scientist that wrote it (and cover his kids braces, college, etc).
Its likely, he added, that Tharsis spewed gases into the atmosphere that created a global warming or greenhouse effect that allowed liquid water to exist on the planet, and also that volcanic eruptions created channels that allowed underground water to reach the surface and fill the northern plains.
The Martians fixed global warming and look what it got them; an arid, cold planet. Bet they wished they had global warming now.
Actually there is a lot of evidence that it did.
That Mars once had water is almost without doubt. Water can be found every where throughout the universe. Just how much water Mars had and how it was distributed across the planet is another story. The prevailing theory as to why there is none existing as surface water on Mars is that the planets inner core cooled down to the point where Mars lost it’s magnetic field which led to it’s losing it’s atmosphere and when that happened extreme radiation bathed the planet, as it still does and the water was, in effect, boiled away.
Thanks BenLurkin. They were shallow alright -- zero inches deep. :^)
|
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.