Skip to comments.
To the Christians who think 50 Shades is all sorts of awesome: Please, stop and THINK
LIFE SITE NEWS ^
| Jonathon van Maren
Posted on 07/31/2014 1:54:53 PM PDT by Morgana
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-96 next last
To: redgolum
Decades of teaching women that becoming nothing more than sex objects is somehow "empowering" and that sex is purely for pleasure has reduced women to this mindset.
41
posted on
08/01/2014 7:50:10 AM PDT
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: wagglebee; jarwulf
Sooner or later, EVERY leftist troll on this forum compares Christians who promote Christian values to fascists or the Taliban.
You clearly don't belong here. ********************************
Exactly right.
42
posted on
08/01/2014 7:50:31 AM PDT
by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: Morgana; wagglebee
Eh. I was always taught that what happened between two consenting adults in the marriage bed was between a husband and wife and no one's business. I don't get it, but if two Christians enjoy bondage in the context of marriage - more power to them.
Now, your use of acronyms certainly indicates that YOU have decided this and your other comments on this thread indicate that YOU support this agenda.
So you are saying that in order to fit in with the conservative ideals we need to toe the line and use words like homo, fudge packer and faggot?
Sounds legit./s
43
posted on
08/01/2014 8:13:43 AM PDT
by
TightyRighty
(I enjoy well-mannered frivolity.)
To: jarwulf
My wife has read this book , and she is no feminazi.
She did say that she felt the book was written by a child who seemed to grab attention to make money.
In the end she thinks it’s just complete garbage.
44
posted on
08/01/2014 8:22:05 AM PDT
by
manc
(Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
To: TightyRighty; Responsibility2nd; DJ MacWoW; little jeremiah; TheOldLady; xzins; trisham; ...
I was always taught that what happened between two consenting adults in the marriage bed was between a husband and wife and no one's business. I'm sure you were taught that, but married men and women isn't the topic of discussion.
So you are saying that in order to fit in with the conservative ideals we need to toe the line and use words like homo, fudge packer and faggot?
Nope, I'm saying that using acronyms that are heavily promoted by the left to advance the homosexual agenda tends to indicate that a person isn't a conservative.
45
posted on
08/01/2014 8:25:44 AM PDT
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: wagglebee
I know of two
church sponsored local book clubs for church members where they all buy, read, then discuss, a novel so members can "form friendships and get to know one another better" that went through this series as their selection of the month.
When porno is embraced by so many "Christians" the horse is out of the barn and already way, way, over the hill.
"Soft" porn is just another one of the many popular "Soft" denials of Christ.
46
posted on
08/01/2014 8:46:59 AM PDT
by
Rashputin
(Jesus Christ doesn't evacuate His troops, He leads them to victory.)
To: wagglebee
what this article is saying is that women who enjoy bondage or whatever strange crap people enjoy when it comes to that kind of sex are being abused. I don’t buy into that.
As to the second part: or it could just mean that fudge packer doesn’t roll off the tongue naturally.
47
posted on
08/01/2014 9:02:08 AM PDT
by
TightyRighty
(I enjoy well-mannered frivolity.)
To: TightyRighty; Responsibility2nd; DJ MacWoW; little jeremiah; TheOldLady; xzins; trisham; ...
what this article is saying is that women who enjoy bondage or whatever strange crap people enjoy when it comes to that kind of sex are being abused. Yes, bondage IS abusive. Some people may enjoy being abused, that doesn't make it right.
As to the second part: or it could just mean that fudge packer doesnt roll off the tongue naturally.
What SPECIFICALLY is YOUR agenda here? You've been a member of FR for a long time, but have relatively few posts and almost all of them are about movies, TV shows, celebrities, etc. All quite suspicious.
48
posted on
08/01/2014 9:23:21 AM PDT
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: TightyRighty
This article is directed toward Christians.
49
posted on
08/01/2014 9:24:19 AM PDT
by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: trisham
Some don't seem to grasp that what is pleasurable is not necessarily moral.
50
posted on
08/01/2014 9:27:06 AM PDT
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: wagglebee
51
posted on
08/01/2014 9:28:11 AM PDT
by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: manc
Another movie about people with First World Problems.
52
posted on
08/01/2014 9:31:13 AM PDT
by
dfwgator
To: TightyRighty
"So you are saying that in order to fit in with the conservative ideals we need to toe the line and use words like homo, fudge packer and faggot?" Sounds legit./s "
Not at all. "Queer" works just fine for me. I find it a heck of a lot more legit than covering up perversion by calling it "gay."
53
posted on
08/01/2014 10:52:04 AM PDT
by
CatherineofAragon
((Support Christian white males---the architects of the jewel known as Western Civilization).)
To: CatherineofAragon
same here. I refuse to call them gay. To me they hijacked that positive word and attached it to their agenda, thus making their agenda nice, warm , and cuddly.
They’re either homosexuals or queers, but not gay.
54
posted on
08/01/2014 11:03:57 AM PDT
by
manc
(Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
as to the headline:
Why would any kind of Christian want to read pseudo-pedo rape fantasy porn??
55
posted on
08/01/2014 11:05:13 AM PDT
by
GeronL
(Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
To: Morgana
Lysistrata. Kama Sutra. de Sade. Etc...
This didn’t start with 50 Shades of Badly Written Tripe.
56
posted on
08/01/2014 11:18:45 AM PDT
by
Dead Corpse
(Tri nornar eg bir. Binde til rota...)
To: wagglebee
I commend your super sleuthing ability. I also appreciate your ability to tag everyone on a post specifically directed to you to help you gang pile on a poster with whom you don’t agree. I suppose my agenda on THIS thread is to point out that just because someone doesn’t use a specific term to label a fudge packer doesn’t mean they aren’t toeing the line. You look like an ass questioning everyone’s motives. I think it’s childish especially when it’s paired with your need to tag everyone on a post to you as well as your need to look your nose down at anyone who prefers a Walking Dead thread to one of the 300 ebola threads. Good day.
57
posted on
08/01/2014 11:18:55 AM PDT
by
TightyRighty
(I enjoy well-mannered frivolity.)
To: manc
Yep, I’m not going to play their game.
They also hijacked the rainbow, an image God created to symbolize His covenant with the earth.
58
posted on
08/01/2014 11:25:57 AM PDT
by
CatherineofAragon
((Support Christian white males---the architects of the jewel known as Western Civilization).)
To: jarwulf
If weve decided that LBGT relationships are none of our business we have absolutely no justification getting in the way of someone elses adult consensual BDSM relationship just because we think its weird and creepy. If it's none of our business, then they need to shut the heck up about what they do in the privacy of their own bedroom.
If they don't want my opinion about it, they need to stop rubbing in my face.
So, since you are on their side, I'm going to start telling you about my Jesus and how He can and wants to save you.
Oh, and IBTZ
59
posted on
08/01/2014 11:49:07 AM PDT
by
metmom
(...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
To: TightyRighty; wagglebee; Morgana
I was always taught that what happened between two consenting adults in the marriage bed was between a husband and wife and no one's business. I don't get it, but if two Christians enjoy bondage in the context of marriage - more power to them. But this book isn't about what two consenting married adults do in their bedroom.
Additionally, if what they do in the privacy of their bedroom is nobody else's business, then they need to shut the heck up and keep it that way.
I don't WANT to know what they're doing and I don't want them flaunting it and rubbing it in my face.
Y'all are right. Threads like this bring out the porn supporters like moths to a flame.
60
posted on
08/01/2014 11:53:08 AM PDT
by
metmom
(...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-96 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson