To: Morgana; wagglebee
Eh. I was always taught that what happened between two consenting adults in the marriage bed was between a husband and wife and no one's business. I don't get it, but if two Christians enjoy bondage in the context of marriage - more power to them.
Now, your use of acronyms certainly indicates that YOU have decided this and your other comments on this thread indicate that YOU support this agenda.
So you are saying that in order to fit in with the conservative ideals we need to toe the line and use words like homo, fudge packer and faggot?
Sounds legit./s
43 posted on
08/01/2014 8:13:43 AM PDT by
TightyRighty
(I enjoy well-mannered frivolity.)
To: TightyRighty; Responsibility2nd; DJ MacWoW; little jeremiah; TheOldLady; xzins; trisham; ...
I was always taught that what happened between two consenting adults in the marriage bed was between a husband and wife and no one's business. I'm sure you were taught that, but married men and women isn't the topic of discussion.
So you are saying that in order to fit in with the conservative ideals we need to toe the line and use words like homo, fudge packer and faggot?
Nope, I'm saying that using acronyms that are heavily promoted by the left to advance the homosexual agenda tends to indicate that a person isn't a conservative.
45 posted on
08/01/2014 8:25:44 AM PDT by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: TightyRighty
"So you are saying that in order to fit in with the conservative ideals we need to toe the line and use words like homo, fudge packer and faggot?" Sounds legit./s "
Not at all. "Queer" works just fine for me. I find it a heck of a lot more legit than covering up perversion by calling it "gay."
53 posted on
08/01/2014 10:52:04 AM PDT by
CatherineofAragon
((Support Christian white males---the architects of the jewel known as Western Civilization).)
To: TightyRighty; wagglebee; Morgana
I was always taught that what happened between two consenting adults in the marriage bed was between a husband and wife and no one's business. I don't get it, but if two Christians enjoy bondage in the context of marriage - more power to them. But this book isn't about what two consenting married adults do in their bedroom.
Additionally, if what they do in the privacy of their bedroom is nobody else's business, then they need to shut the heck up and keep it that way.
I don't WANT to know what they're doing and I don't want them flaunting it and rubbing it in my face.
Y'all are right. Threads like this bring out the porn supporters like moths to a flame.
60 posted on
08/01/2014 11:53:08 AM PDT by
metmom
(...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
To: TightyRighty; wagglebee; Morgana
61 posted on
08/01/2014 11:54:11 AM PDT by
metmom
(...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson