Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

More Fowl Play at Iowa Caucus Revealed
Youtube ^ | February 2, 2016 | Youtube

Posted on 02/04/2016 4:04:00 AM PST by true believer forever

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-140 next last
To: gogeo

you couldn’t have said that with a straight face, right?

its not possible.

buying endorsements is up there too,

Comparing someone to a child molester is nice.

mimicking an ill person is great!!

bimbo? why not! that’ll turn the women out!

cheat with mens’ wives then say you’ve never asked God for forgiveness.

What a GUY!!


61 posted on 02/04/2016 5:24:10 AM PST by dp0622
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: libbylu
This is politics. I don't see the big conspiracy. I do see the media protecting Rubio from his role. And a bunch of people crying foul just like their hero who could care less that their guy personally trashed candidates.

Thank you for your comment, prefer not to engage.

62 posted on 02/04/2016 5:24:34 AM PST by true believer forever (Trump 2016 - I never knew an entire country could have an ephiphany!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: true believer forever
I don't have a problem with this. Hang out with Democrats, and you will come out smelling like manure.


63 posted on 02/04/2016 5:27:58 AM PST by Hoodat (Article 4, Section 4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VanDeKoik

Iowa isn’t the only state using the caucus system to select the Presidential nominee.

Take a look:

http://www.thegreenpapers.com/P16/events.phtml?s=c


64 posted on 02/04/2016 5:28:36 AM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: dp0622

...and there you go again. On a thread that details dirty tactics and a possible violation of campaign laws, you got no problem. Because it’s aimed at Trump. Clean elections are lower on your list of priorities than slamming Trump. How much lower, I wonder?


65 posted on 02/04/2016 5:31:59 AM PST by gogeo (If you are Tea Party, the GOPee does not want you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: gogeo

?


66 posted on 02/04/2016 5:32:06 AM PST by Theo (Trump = French Revolution. Cruz = American Revolution. Choose wisely.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: gogeo
On a thread that details dirty tactics and a possible violation of campaign laws . . .

What campaign laws were violated?

67 posted on 02/04/2016 5:34:10 AM PST by Hoodat (Article 4, Section 4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: true believer forever

If this is true then no Republican should touch this sleazebag ever again.

In the wake of the reports about the CNN story I took the position that some Cruz staffers probably saw the story, got excited about the opportunity it represented, but realized time was short. So they made a rash decision to rush the news out in an attempt to snag Carson voters, not out of malice against Carson but as more of a good-faith effort to sway Carson voters for whom Cruz was 2nd choice.

If it was deliberate then the source and anyone who knew the false nature of the narrative should be held accountable.


68 posted on 02/04/2016 5:34:44 AM PST by Another Post-American (Jesus died for your sins.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: deport

The Iowa GOP did not use a caucus system to select a nominee. It was a secret ballot that happened at caucuses. There’s a difference.


69 posted on 02/04/2016 5:35:09 AM PST by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: true believer forever

Wow! I hadn’t seen that!


70 posted on 02/04/2016 5:35:33 AM PST by sauropod (I am His and He is mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gogeo
I would have never dreamed we had a pro-election fraud caucus on FR

What election fraud? How was the election fraudulent? Please be specific.

71 posted on 02/04/2016 5:35:45 AM PST by Hoodat (Article 4, Section 4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: VanDeKoik
It's always been a joke. And with the internet, it's going to be even more vulnerable to this crap.

As screwed up as the Republican caucus process is, and it is screwy for sure, it's a model of democracy compared to the Dim process. At least at the end of the day, the R's have a secret ballot.

The D's are forced to declare and then have to put up with their neighbors trying to shame/harass them into publicly aligning with another candidate.

And then, they don't even disclose the vote count.

No wonder that caucus participation is generally very low.

72 posted on 02/04/2016 5:36:31 AM PST by TontoKowalski (Satisfied Customer #291)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: sheikdetailfeather

You just laid an egg with that one...


73 posted on 02/04/2016 5:37:58 AM PST by sauropod (I am His and He is mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: sauropod

Caucuses have always allowed the distribution of campaign materials. They’re neighborhood meetings to elect party officers, consider platform proposals, and recruit people to support candidates.


74 posted on 02/04/2016 5:40:11 AM PST by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: gogeo

no, they’ve both played dirty.

who cares?

now you take the moral high ground? you’re better than that.

they’re both sleazy and it turns out vicious too.

good. maybe one of them will be the president.

i dont give a @#$@#$ about all the stuff i listed about trump, and he was great after the great concession speech.

but that laptop....just sat....in the corner... :)

what do you care. he’s gonna win big in a few days and it will be over except going though the motions.


75 posted on 02/04/2016 5:42:56 AM PST by dp0622
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: true believer forever

Ironically, that picture with the commentary by “Dale Winans” is itself a dirty trick because it completely misrepresents the nature and rules of a caucus.

See how that works?


76 posted on 02/04/2016 5:45:08 AM PST by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kanawa

The writer obviously has never been to a caucus. They absolutely do distribute materials, t-shirts, free coffee, donuts; they beg, lead, whine, cajole, whatever it takes to get you to vote for their guy or gal. It is not sleazy, it’s expected. That’s why a caucus is so much fun. All the competent campaigns have representation at each caucus site to watch out for their guy’s interests, but campaigning is what it is all about.


77 posted on 02/04/2016 5:48:32 AM PST by jstaff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Hoodat

Electioneering. Handing out the business cards with Trump, Bill & Hill.


78 posted on 02/04/2016 5:51:39 AM PST by MortMan (I am offended by those who believe they have a right not to be offended.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: tanknetter
Ironically, that picture with the commentary by "Dale Winans" is itself a dirty trick because it completely misrepresents the nature and rules of a caucus.

See how that works?

The guy was from PA, so don't know how much he knew about IA. He presented the evidence of what he was talking about and I supplied a video link which talked more about it.

But Paul Pate is the Iowa secy of state and he has this to say about electioneering:

Can I wear a campaign button or t-shirt into the polling place when I vote?

Voters may wear a campaign button or clothing when they go to vote but must leave the polling place as soon as they are done voting. Campaigning or electioneering of any kind in a polling place is illegal; loitering in a polling place while wearing political items is considered electioneering.

see how that works?

https://sos.iowa.gov/elections/voterinformation/edfaq.html

79 posted on 02/04/2016 5:55:25 AM PST by true believer forever (Trump 2016 - I never knew an entire country could have an ephiphany!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: nclaurel

Any idea of the kind of people DT has besides pit bull terrorist lawyers?


80 posted on 02/04/2016 5:57:21 AM PST by huldah1776 ( Vote Pro-life! Allow God to bless America before He avenges the death of the innocent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-140 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson