There appeared a thread yesterday: Fortuyn favoured depraved It said that Pim Fortuyn was 'a powerful advocate or paedophilia'. The article in the Scotsman is based on an 1999 column of Pim Fortuyn.The article there leaves out the things that make one understand what he is saying. 1. If it was true this was such a vile column, Elsevier would have never allowed it to be printed 2. If it was true this was such a vile column, the media an left parties would have brought it to the attention of people months ago. And by doing so stopping Fortuyn...