[Well, nobody is "killing a disabled person"...so that brings us to the flip-side question for you:
And why are "no witnesses" sufficient (to many people, at least) to deny someone of her rights?]
Are we all talking about the same case here? Terri IS diabled and Michael's statemtents were refuted by others. (I guess their testimony was hearsay, alledgedly)
Get in tha game, dude.