Free Republic

The fact is that the democrats have ran a relentless agenda to drive all traditional and religious values behind closed doors (utilizing the ACLU) with claims to not judge and to keep your religious views behind closed doors while at the same time trying to replace these values with the values of the homosexual community or the sexual revolution of the sixties counter culture.

‘Shock value’ is promoted by the leftist media and our children are continually more and more targeted by perversions and all sorts of moral corruptions that democrats promote as being ‘tolerant’ or ‘humerous’, etc…

The democrat party is a pervert party. They are not Christian but are pagan and satanic.

To this very day - the most celebrated member of the democrat party is Robert KKK Byrd.

No other democrat in history has received more internal party promotions then Robert KKK Byrd. (Byrd used to brag about this fact on his website) KKK Byrd was even recently third in line to the Presidency as voted internally by his fellow democrats. He was called the ‘conscience of the senate’ by many of his fellow democrats.

Coincidence?

Now today in 2012 the KKK democrats seek to redefine civil rights and no one even brings up the fact that it is the party of the KKK who is doing this. Is being black equal to being a homosexual? According to democrats it is.

Robert KKK Byrd is the still the poster child of the democrat party today in 2012 symbolizing the hidden agenda of the progressive movement.

Lest we forget that the demcorats are the party of the KKK.

What is it not pointed out by the media (or by anyone) that we are about to have the party of the KKK, who fought against civil rights for nearly their entire history, now redefine the meaning of civil rights in America.

Why is it never discussed as to how this issue will redefine ‘civil rights’? Is precedent being set for a person’s sexual behavior to possibly be as important (or more important?) as their race or gender? When more types of sexual behavior or sexual identification become recoginized as protected classes then how do all these different protected classes weigh against eachother? Is being homosexual more important then being black?

To the best of my knowledge, a person’s behavior has never been a means to identify a group for protection under civil rights legislation or any legal precedent. The party of the KKK is about to completely reconfigure the meaning of civil rights.

It amazes me that the party of the KKK is possibly near accomplishing the complete reconfiguration of the meaning of civil rights and no one even points out that fact.

Black Americans should better wake up and realize how they are about to be thrown under the bus by the party of the KKK.

And how is my post funny?

The website you are linking to has adverstisements by the NJEA (leftwing fascist teachers association) in order to promote a socialist demcorat and the video you want everyone to watch bashes bankers ( a favorite pastime of democrats) and bashes capitlaism and freemarkets and is promoting more regulation from big government.

Your post is a bunch of leftwing propaganda geared towards a the same hatred held by the Occupiers. You even have ads paid for by the fascist teachers union on your site.

Why post your fascist / socialist propagandfa here?

Everyone already was equal under the law. What democrats want to achieve is to use a person’s sexual behavior to make some more equal then others under the law.

The first behavior will be homosexuality that we will be forced to treat as being protected. Then it may be polygamy or incest or S&M behavior or transexuality (already happening) or pedophelia, etc……

The fascist agenda of democrat is not for equality but for destroying true equality. They always have been and are the party of the KKK and is incredible that they are getting to redefine civil rights in America in a way that will really destroy civil rights without anyone in the MSM even mentioning their true history on the issue.

Right and after the election of progressive democrat Woodrow Wilson who had landslide wins in the Confederate South in his two Presidential elections the progressive movement revitalized the KKK and championed many causes they still follow today based upon their alignment with the Klan.

Seperation of Church and State seems to have first originiated back in the early Klan days when the democrats started boycotting religious ceremonies at the Capitol because Republicans were inviting black American leaders. In the more progressive days of the Klan they became more known for their anti-Catholic and anti-traditional religious values agenda (though many Catholics still voted democrat) with a KKK lawyer (Hugo Black) being appointed to the Supreme Court by progressive icon FDR who inserted the KKK agenda into the Constitution in order to discriminate against reliogn in the public sphere. The progressive movement still to this day strives to replace all traditional values (drive religion behind closed doors) with the values of the Marxist counter cutlure and the homosexual communities. To hear a progressive democrat rail against the Catholic Church today is not much different then their pagan counter parts in the KKK back in the days of Wilson or FDR.

Abortion started with Margaret Sanger and her anti-black eugenics diatribes that she used to give for her fellow progressive KKK friends. Even today the most targeted demographic by abortion policies is the black communities. Coincidence?

This is the year 2012 and still to this day the most internally promoted demcorat in history is Robert KKK Byrd. He has received more internal party promotions (was even third in line from Presidency recent) than any other democrat in all of history. Byrd was a Kln recruiter and possibly more who claimed to have denounced the KKK but was caught in that lie on an occasion aftwerwards communicating with them for support and even had used the ‘N’ word on national television as late as the 1990s. Yet he has received more internal party praise (called the ‘consciense of the Senate’ by his fellow democrats and has been more promoted by his fellow democrats in Congress then any other democrat in history all the way up to today.

Coincidence? A dedicated KKK recruiter who job it is to promote the Klan is the most internally democrat in history still today in 2012? Byrd used to brag about this fact even on his website on how he had received more internal party promotions then any other democrat in history. Why is this not pointed out by our media?

I personally find it bizarre even right now that the party of the KKK is on the verge of redefining the meaning of civil rights in America to include sexual behavior as a means to create a new specially protected class that should be in competition with race as to importance in civil rights issues and yet the media does not at all mention their party history. There will be open ended questions legally for liberal activist judges to decide as to the weight of ssexual behavior in contrast to gender or race, how will that play out? Will age eventually be a factor as well?

Either way it seems as if the media is not concerned to mwention that it is the party of the KKK who has opposed civil rights for their entire history who is on the verge of redefining them now today.

The leftwing and the democrat party used the counter culture to infiltrate black communities and morally corrupt black youth and families. Race card peddelers who would preach hatred for the system, vicitimization and messages of hatred for republicans and rich white Americans while at the same time preaching relative morality, bringing in illegal drugs and all of the other moral corruptions and promises of government handouts from the democrats have enslaved many blacks to a live of misery. (Marxism thrives on misery) Sibngkle black woman have babies for welfare checks, black male youths ended up behind bars in large numbers, etc… As long as democrats and leftwing propagandists controlled the message then the leftwing would never accept responsibility for the misery they were creating but always use it to further spread messages of division and hate among black youths and communities.

Again I honestly find your message to be mean spirited and cruel. To tell a child that the cause of their fatal disease is their parents being angry, hateful or being sinners is wrong. To tell an adult person that their disease is caused by their anger, negative emotions or their sinful nature is also mean spirited as well.

You claim that you have exposed some truth in this regard but I did not see any evidence at all presented by you in this thread or in the video you linked to. Please be specific and cite the evidence you are relying on for your claims.

I also am not reacting emotionally at all. It is 100% through logic that I find your claims to be wrong and mean spirited. If you can not logically see how your message can be cruel then it is you who are blind.

fabian said - “I am helping people….”

There is nothing wrong with trying to help people deal with stress (especially patients suffering with disease) or in helping people find salvation or find the Lord. I am all for these things.

fabian said - “….and you are quite blind, sadly.”

But it is you who are blind and not me in that you do not see how your ‘root cause’ argument is wrong and also hateful. To tell a child or anyone that their cancer is their fault because they are an angry hateful person or because they do not have real salvation is absolutely horrible and mean spirited. It is sick and cruel. It is unbeleivable to me that you can sit their and defend telling a child suffering from a fatal disease such things. It is you who are blind to your own hateful behavior.

Oh so I am expressing hate because I stated that I thought your message to people suffering from cancer was hateful. I see. I guess anyone who disagrees with you is hateful then.

There are often? So then what percent of chidlren got cancer because they or their family were too angry or too hateful? I guess then you tell them that either they repent or get what they deserve?

I am just curious… do you tell little children who are suffering from cancer or some fatal disease this same message claiming that the ‘root cause’ of their disease is that they harbor too much hatred and anger and resentment? That if only they could become a better person and find salvation then maybe they wont have to die?

Pathetic.

This is actually a very nasty post.

Your claim is that cancer and other diseases are the fault of the person who gets them being that they are hateful and angry people and that is why they have cancer. That they have not found salvation so that is why they have cancer or other diseases.

That is a sick and hateful position in and of itself. It takes a very sick and hateful human being to tell a person suffering from a fatal disease that it is their own fault and is due to them being hateful and angry.

By your own logic you should be getting a taste of your own medicine and feeling the effects of these hateful and angry accusation you are making against those who suffer with cancer and other diseases.

Byron York is showing himself to be an idiot. By his standards the Constitution only means what legislators say it means and in this case they do not even have to know that they are changing the meaning of the Constitution when they do so by creating a law.

Legislation does not change the meaning of the Constitution Mr. York. You are proving yourself an idiot to make such an argument.

The article trys to make the methods used to deal with bad loans the cause? The cause is the bad loans to begin with and not the faulty methods used to try and prop them up.

It is very possible that all of these so-called questionable mathematical models would of worked just fine had the market not been forcibly flooded with trillions of dollars in bad loans by the democrats, ACORN and the GSEs (Fannie and Freddie).

My cousin works on the SWAT team that was called in for this. Absolutely sickening. It is amazing what the police have to put up with and then still maintain professional conduct.

On more then one occasion I have had some left-winger try to claim that I was ‘radical’ during a debate on homosexuality and ‘gay marriage’ and even that I was so radical that I lose all credibility. To which I laugh of course and instantly remind them that it is them who are proposing ideas that go against the values of every generation before us and that in fact makes them the radical and not me. I am defending the positions of our grandparents and our Founders while they are arguing that every generation before us were evil bigots. It is the progressive movement that is radical and hates our grandparents and our Founders.

Someone should call this bigot out as to why he is only concerned with a flag to represent one type of sexual perverted behavior (homosexuality) that someone who served may or may not have participated in. Where was his flag to represent pedophelia? Or bestiality? Or S&M? Or nudists? Or infantialism? Or swingers into group sex? Why is this bigot excluding these behaviors???