Free Republic

For most of the states the certifications were the same in all the years.

So Hawaii wasn't the only one to change then? Shouldn't this fact lend more credence to the likelihood of simply a somewhat arbitrary change?

The bigger question - as I said in the post - is why the HDP didn’t certify eligibility in 2008.

Whether or not it was certified by the HDP isn't an issue at all, the issue is whether or not it was verified, which I doubt the HDP did. Pelosi clearly certified that he was eligible on the first DNC document, but it is highly unlikely that she actually verified anything; instead she merely took the eligibility for granted, just like so many others. We know for a fact that the MSM didn't verify anything, but they clearly de facto certified him. I'm curious to see these HDP documents when you get them up, but I'm sorry I just don't see there being an actual issue here. If indeed Obama was not born in Hawaii, I just don't think the conspiracy is as widespread in the government as some of you other's believe. I find it much more likely that it's a widespread case of arrogance and naivety but not that of intent (for most), much like that in the general population.

Gore’s and Kerry’s certification were the exact same as Obama. None of them include to constitionally eligible bit and all three have the though/through typo. This is not a legitimate argument.

http://nativeborncitizen.wordpress.com/2010/04/18/certification-of-nomination/

http://www.scribd.com/doc/19712995/Gore-2000-Cert

http://www.scribd.com/doc/19712996/Kerry-2004-Cert

Not to scribd. If it is there then it was somebody else’s doing before he deleted his. He only did the one on the main thread with the black background and the “tear”.

Again, the copy with the black background was created this morning by a freeper.

The “Republic of Kenya” issue has been addressed. The Zanzibar issue has been addressed. The font was addressed. E.F. Lavenader is hardly evidence of a forgery. The 47044 seems to have a logical explanation, and Obama Sr.’s age is listed correctly as 25. Are there any other abnormalities?

If nothing else, it seems to me that there is no sound reason to reject this at face value. I’m anxious to see WND’s follow up and what the next few days brings.

In regards to the claims that BO seniors age is listed as 26:

Zoom in and examine the document carefully. It does indeed say 25. The angle of the picture makes it difficult to tell, but if you compare the number to the 5 and 6 in 5th August, 1961, you can tell that the loop made for the 5’s is much bigger than that of the sixes, and that the second digit of his age does match the 5 in the date of birth. Zoom in far enough and you can even see the straight line at the top of the 5.

Delete the copy with the black background. Salamander made that copy for another user on the main thread to make it easier to read. It is not ripped, he admittedly just isn’t very good with photoshop. There is nothing to this picture.