Free Republic

Yes Trump has his reasons, well so what? After 6 years his reasons are obviously wrong. He hasnt learned anything. Loving the dude doesnt me you have to have a hypocritical and juvenile defense for his total lack of discernment when it comes to others. For the guy who constantly obsesses about and talks about loyalty, and yet is known to have none, is rather strange.

Yeah duh, you ugly infection. That is what you politicians do, play politics.

They should sue the ex employees for defamation for accusing them of this stupid retarded term of genocide. They have / had a responsibility to not defame their employer as being employees of Google, their statements carry more weight in the court of public opinion. A company cannot be forced to hire and pay people who actively engage in working against the company. Teach this scum they should be happy with loss of pay and not be in jail.

Unfortunately true, maturity is so lacking anymore. Why can’t people just keep their mouth shut. Being wildly successful and rich and the guv just ain’t enough. Got say or write something else to get attention, idiots.

1) Well said. Obama was almost as low as Joe for re-elect and cruised to reelection, but with the arch retardican Romney running for the Rs, it didnt matter.
2) Clearly no plan, you can say there was no fraud, but not really beleive it, yet republicans aren’t sophisticated enough to understand it. You along with the narrative but work behind the scenes against the fraud.
3) talking to Kari Lake the other night, God love her, she/they think they can win because things are so bad in the country that they will not be able to overcome the vote with fraud. Thats a poor position to run on. Guess she/candidates have to watch what they say and never know who they are talking to

Well Shaun, even a well written article screaming even louder than you did does not hide the fact that you are clueless about the vary issue organization you represent. The problem is the constitution is silent to life. Until society addresses when life begin, the aborting, euthanasia, murdering, etc is going to continue. If nothing guarantees our right to life then we have no rights. That’s the purpose of the viability, 15 week, 6 week strategy, at some point the SC has to establish that fact, but that is all water under the bridge not that the SC washed their hands of their most important responsibility in overturning Roe. Whereas they created a right to abortion because the constitution was silent to it, they had the opportunity to create a right to life as it also is silent in the constitution but is obviously implied and assumed since all other rights are meaningless without the right to life. The worst decision in SC history was written by none other than Alito and unbelievably Robert’s was actually on the right side. A 6 week ban allows for a 5 week then 4 week and eventually no weeks, but because the retardicans wanted an all or nothing, dems will continue to stroll out the 12 yo rape victim forced to carry her rapists baby to term because of retarded republicans

Nasa talking to space craft a billion miles away, and I can’t get my cell phone to work when I want it or stop butt calling people when I don’t want it to work.

Your response to dpetty is uncalled for. He raises a good point. Is Trump capable of doing anything wrong in your mind? You sound like an idiot and add insult to injury when you trash a fellow freeper and the best Gov this country has at the same time. Get a life.

Well said.
PA has historically had a large dem advantage, even when the had 1 million, the Rs still won statewide sometimes. R registration surged before 2016 and 2020 as well, yet another anecdotal evidence of total fraud. Hopefully it has continued and not swinging back and forth. They will need more magic to overcome the 700K trump lead on election night.

I agree with reallocating funds from other wasteful programs.
I agree we cant make EU do anything, but it just goes to prove the point. The EU has equal population to US and a significant GDP. Putin is using the push to put Ukraine in NATO as an excuse for war. Thats a line he will not cross.So if they want Uke to be a part of Nato, but will not even put up the cash and weapns to defend them now,why would they die for Ukraine. It would just expose the total farce of NATO and the impotent EU governments in general. They all cry if Uke falls, Putin will Invade some one else.Just so stupid. No one believes that. He cant advance in Ukraine now after 2 years. He has just got to get a cease fire with some territorial gains to save face. Russia is exhausted. Yes it would be a gimmick for all the right reasons.
As far as reelection, both sides, us and them give ourselves way to much credit. The political pundits all listen and think political junkies matter. We dont. Some liberal is sweet on Israel and the media goes beserk. The .03% of the liberal base demands action, threatens the dem and they get reelected anyway. 99% of people just dont care. 90% of people don’t even know who their reps are. Never enough people care about foreign aid to cost anyone their. Its fun to humor ourselves thinking the repubs care when freeperland gets in a tizzy. They dont cause they know we dont matter. No offense to you. Its just life.

You would like to see who would vote. . . .???? Why? Who cares, nothing will happen to a single rep.Not a single rep is at risk of losing reelection of either party this November regardless how they vote on any foreign aid bill. No one cares. Make it 1 big bill with border wall funding at 100 billion with no allowance for any court order restrictio s or presidential EOs. Construction must commence and moneis dispersed in tandem, 1 dollar to Ukraine for each spent on border funding. 2. Each dollar to Uke must be matched simultaneously with a dollar from the EU. Give Uke 100, 200.billion. if you want to “See” how they would vote that is something worth seeing

But this attack kind of proves to and maybe even Israel itself that Iran does not have the capability to deliver a nuclear weapon when they do finish them. Then how many would they have to build when only 1% get thru. Would they even take that chance cause they know Israel can punch back with a nuke. Just like NK cant and never will build a nuke and if they did they couldnt deliver it anywhere anyway. They cant even build a reliable missle. Nk stuffs a mountain full of tnt and sets it off and the world keeps saying he is testing. They need to ignore the little twit and stop giving him the attention he craves.

Every day brings another abortion story because of that imbecile Alito who wrote that my right to live is subject to the vote of the majority. The 2nd greatest jurist we have could not see that if the SC could create a right to abortion where the constitution is silent on the matter, how simple would it be to create a right to life since the constitution is silent on that also.

No down ballot is AL but OH would kill Sherrods chances. No way that many would vote for senator when no dem prez on ballot.

No sadly he is right, Jews could care less about Israel. Gods chosen have rejected God from the beginning. Its so sad. He has blessed them beyond measure, yet they always turn their back on him.

The chart does not take into account the awarding of 2 EV for the popular vote of each state. Since the R’s win the majority of the states, usually 30+ that would make the difference.
Again, this would actually make it more constitutional and more to the framers intent, (if you can say). Unlike the opposite mob rule control of a popular vote that the dems want. The majority of Americans would actually have a vote that counts but yet still be protected from the mass hoards of city voters. Small states with small population still get a vote plus the 2 EV (for the senators so to say) and the large populations still get a voice too.
Eliminating vote fraud for a generation is still the biggest plus to the whole deal.

I think you misunderstood what I am saying. Awarding electoral votes by congressional district would do a multitude of things.
1) It gives more people a vote that actually counts. When it comes to presidential elections, only the votes in less than a dozen states matter. Congressional district awarding, would give the vast majority of Americans a say so in voting for president.
2) It would force candidates to campaign everywhere, because every district would count, of course many are solid red or blue, but many more places would see some candidates pass their way. For instance, the dems start with 52 EV for CA before the voting even begins, even though there are 11 republican districts. The R candidate would at least get 11 EV from CA and those peoples votes would actually count.
3) The biggest reason is the elimination of fraud for a generation, because the effect of massed dem votes in cities of every state would only effect the congressional district of that city, not the whole freaking state.

True, the EV count and states not the people actually picking the president is constitutional, it apparently isn’t enforceable as Maine and Nebraska don’t do it. Congressional district EV awarding would actually improve on the intent of the founders when writing our constitutional process for electing a president.
It also would spread the advertising dollars around so that much of America would see political advertising and the same few places that always get unindated with advertising blitzes would get a break. And don’t anyone say they don’t like political advertising, if you didn’t like it they wouldn’t do it. It works. They got the millions you don’t. Think about that.
In 94 and to a lessor extent in 2010, Republicans had a trifecta in WI, MI, IN, OH, PA, NY, NJ, IL. They could have changed their states to EV awarding by congressional district, but they didn’t because they are genetically mutantly fundamentally hopelessly retarded!.
As a member of the state committee of PA, I heard with my own ears the retarded bloviating idiot GOP chairman say, “we have never done it that way before” “that would diminish our states clout” in the presidential election. IOW, they would rather lose the state and the presidency as long as the politicians keep stroking there egos and keep coming to woo them every 4 years.
Your comment “If the republicans controlled a state” the did in the rust belt, but the rest belt always votes dem because of them running up the vote in the cities. The dems would still get the 2 for the senators / popular vote.
Remember GW only won the presidency by 2 votes. He needed 23 EV to beat Gore and FL had 25 at the time. If GW had not won NH, the FL recount would not have happened cause he would have already lost. Every EV vote matters and they should not just a hand full of states.

In addition, the R’s always win a majority of the states, 30+ so they would get the 2 EV for each state won with the popular vote. So even in years where they don’t win congress, they would still come out on top, assuming every CD goes for the same party for Congress and Prez. Again, this is how you improve on the constitution. Actually giving people more power and protecting them from mob rule of the simple popular vote.
You all know darn well if the shoe was on the other foot, the Dems would have already done this, but we can’t expect any common sense from the Retardican party.

I think you misunderstood what I am saying. Awarding electoral votes by congressional district would do a multitude of things.
1) It gives more people a vote that actually counts. When it comes to presidential elections, only the votes in less than a dozen states matter. Congressional district awarding, would give the vast majority of Americans a say so in voting for president.
2) It would force candidates to campaign everywhere, because every district would count, of course many are solid red or blue, but many more places would see some candidates pass their way. For instance, the dems start with 52 EV for CA before the voting even begins, even though there are 11 republican districts. The R candidate would at least get 11 EV from CA and those peoples votes would actually count.
3) The biggest reason is the elimination of fraud for a generation, because the effect of massed dem votes in cities of every state would only effect the congressional district of that city, not the whole freaking state.

True, the EV count and states not the people actually picking the president is constitutional, it apparently isn’t enforceable as Maine and Nebraska don’t do it. Congressional district EV awarding would actually improve on the intent of the founders when writing our constitutional process for electing a president.
It also would spread the advertising dollars around so that much of America would see political advertising and the same few places that always get unindated with advertising blitzes would get a break. And don’t anyone say they don’t like political advertising, if you didn’t like it they wouldn’t do it. It works. They got the millions you don’t. Think about that.
In 94 and to a lessor extent in 2010, Republicans had a trifecta in WI, MI, IN, OH, PA, NY, NJ, IL. They could have changed their states to EV awarding by congressional district, but they didn’t because they are genetically mutantly fundamentally hopelessly retarded!.
As a member of the state committee of PA, I heard with my own ears the retarded bloviating idiot GOP chairman say, “we have never done it that way before” “that would diminish our states clout” in the presidential election. IOW, they would rather lose the state and the presidency as long as the politicians keep stroking there egos and keep coming to woo them every 4 years.
Your comment “If the republicans controlled a state” the did in the rust belt, but the rest belt always votes dem because of them running up the vote in the cities. The dems would still get the 2 for the senators / popular vote.
Remember GW only won the presidency by 2 votes. He needed 23 EV to beat Gore and FL had 25 at the time. If GW had not won NH, the FL recount would not have happened cause he would have already lost. Every EV vote matters and they should not just a hand full of states.

Wasnt Bibi just playing politics? Thats what you are suppose to do. He knew the dems were out to get him. Obama already cost him reelection once before.

Sorry folks, but electoral votes by congressional district would have wiped out obama and biden. 2) its actually more constitutional in spirit than winner take all. It eliminates big city control over every state, effectively eliminates vote fraud for a generation. And when the republicans controlled the rust belt, TWICE, in the past 30 years it could have been done. But we dont have a republican party. We have a retardican party.