Free Republic 3rd Qtr 2024 Fundraising Target: $81,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $13,446
16%  
Woo hoo!! And we're now over 16%!! Thank you all very much!! God bless.

Posts by fjcroderick

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • Why Purgatory Is a Dangerous Doctrine

    04/28/2021 3:22:14 AM PDT · 173 of 330
    fjcroderick to Old Yeller

    Rejoice in Christ always!

    My name is Chris.

    I am reminded of two verses from the Holy Gospel that I wish to share with you as a preamble to my note.

    “38 But Jesus said, Forbid him no more; no one who does a miracle in my name will lightly speak evil of me. 39 The man who is not against you is on your side.”

    In all charity, Your recent article in Christian Post on the subject of Purgatory is Shallow, short sighted and uninformed. It reads very much like an attempt to be a relevant, edgy buzz piece.

    I wish to offer you the sincere opportunity to talk to a moderately well informed Catholic on the subject to privately clarify your misconceptions. While the Catechism of The Catholic Church is indeed the common catechism of the faith, it is ti be understood in conjunction with the Catechism of Trent and the entire Deposit of Faith.

    To begin:

    A reasonably simple articulation of the dogmatic doctrine of purgatory can be found in the Catholic Encyclopedia. (Link attached) https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/12575a.htm

    Purgatory was first defined formally defined by the bishop of Rome, Gregory X, in Lyon France in 1274 and was supported most obviously scripturally in maccabees, until the book was eventually rejected by Luther some 250 years later.

    If you were truly sincere in investigating the Doctrine of purgatory, I’m quite sure you would have also looked at other Councils that spoke on the matter The Council of Florence in 1431 and the Council of Trent in 1545 speak with greater nuance than the strawman presentation you gave it.

    In fact, common faith in purgatory is held not only my the mother of St. Augustine, but is supported by scriptures you still hold to be inspired. (1 Cor 3:15 and Matt. 12:32)

    As a brother in the Faith, I reminded you that as always you, and you must remember this, no prophecy in scripture is the subject of private interpretation. (loosely quoting 2 peter)

    Feel free to hit me up If you wish to move beyond the the shallow waters christianity you appear to be pushing.

    In Christ,

    Chris.

  • Meanwhile in Canada,

    04/14/2021 6:36:27 PM PDT · 1 of 10
    fjcroderick
  • Do the Covid=19 vaccines contain aborted baby body parts?

    02/17/2021 10:15:18 AM PST · 64 of 80
    fjcroderick to varyouga

    It violates the principle of the integral good.

    Its an old Question.

    Aquinas answered it in 1485.

    First Part, Question 48 Article 4

    Does evil totally corrupt good?

    https://www.newadvent.org/summa/1048.htm

  • Do the Covid=19 vaccines contain aborted baby body parts?

    02/16/2021 11:24:33 PM PST · 40 of 80
    fjcroderick to hapnHal

    Do the Covid-19 vaccines contain aborted baby body parts.

    Whole Parts? No.

    Parts of parts? like Genetic Contaminants? Yes, some.

    Distinguo.

    Some vaccines are not tested on cells grown from genetic material taken from a dead kiddo.

    Some vaccines are tested on cells grown from genetic material taken from a dead kiddo.

    Other, like the AstraZeneca vector based vaccine, are not only tested on cells grown from genetic material taken from a dead kiddo.

    But... in the manufacturing process actually inject a mutated virus into cells grown from genetic material taken from a dead kiddo, and then are harvested from the cells of the aforementioned dead kiddo.

    The ‘moral’ problem *from a Catholic perspective, is not necessarily the testing or the genetic contaminants but rather a question of the Integral good.

    TLDR...

    The Principle of the Integral, basically, is that for something to be Good, all parts of it must be good.

    dead kids, have a right according to their god given dignity to a proper burial. Their DNA is part of their essential nature. Murdered (aborted) children have a right to their own body and are owed the dignity proper of any dead person. At no time did they consent to have parts/aspects of themselves perpetuated, pressed into service and indiscriminately destroyed.

    Although the DNA may be replicated and consist of different physical ‘material’, the fact remains that the substance of a dead person is being not only duplicated (without their consent) but is also being used as a factory to produce material, whose extraction process consists in the deliberate destruction of life.

    There is a whole bunch of other issues such as genetic contaminants but the Core principals at play is the Integral Good.

    Abortion contaminated vaccines are illicit because they are materially complicit in the theft from dead persons as are those who receive them.

    Your basically using a human being as a means to an end. (Abortion contaminated vaccines)

    The posted chart was sourced here:

    https://lozierinstitute.org/update-covid-19-vaccine-candidates-and-abortion-derived-cell-lines/

    abortion-derived cell lines are highlighted with a triangle.

    any use of abortion-derived cell line in the process violates the Principle of the Integral good.

    Saint Thomas Aquinas, Whether evil corrupts the whole good?

    https://www.newadvent.org/summa/1048.htm#article4

    Fr Ripperger discusses the principal of the integral good and movies in this youtube clip:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vn-GNljbNs0&ab_channel=SensusFidelium

    Congratulations if you made it this far.

    :-)

    Cheers!