12/21/2004 9:28:21 AM PST
· 17 of 54 boedark
to Captain Kirk
Quote:
Why is that issue particularly important compared to Rumsfeld failure to take a couple minutes out of his day to sign a couple letters?
-----
That's the kicker for me too. I've been an adament Rummy supporter but it looks to me as if the gilding is wareing thin. Auto signing letters concerning those who have died for the cause is not an option and should never have been.
Okay Pete. Take a deep breath. Now, get together with the rest of the Libby's, have a gang hug, feel each other's pain and hum a few bars of kumbaya. Feel better?
Quote: Knitebane, I really have enjoyed your posts on this thread tonight. I particularly liked the automotive example. It reminds me a bit of "In the beginning was the command line".
... most of those universities were runing Unix systems and were connected to the Internet long before Microsoft added a TCP/IP stack to Windows patched the BSD (UNIX) TCP/IP stack onto Windows. Coulnd't even do that themselves.
Yes, but in their defense, why re-invent the wheel?
Quote: "Sequoia"? That's bad, but the worst I ever heard was a girl I went to elementary school with. Her name was, and I am NOT kidding: Tiffany Titz. (I swear.)
I can beat that. Years ago when I worked as a salesman I had a customer whose name was - and I KID You NOT! - Tad Mooredick
Quote: More immediately to the point, unless she told him she was recording the conversations, they are illegal and inadmissible in court.
I've seen this thought posted on several occasions. The laws governing the taping of phone conversations vary from state to state. For instance - in Texas (where I live) she would not have violated any law. Does anybody know what the law of New York says of such behavior?