Free Republic

One knows how important personal relationships are in politics. With them you can achieve a lot, even in defiance of the laws and national interests. For example, it is possible to get special government employee status granted (1) to your mistress who is tied to Islamic extremists.

Of course, I mean the case of Huma Abedin and Hillary Clinton. Let's remember, in 2012, then Minnesota Representative, Michele Bachmann called to investigate (2) Huma Abedin's ties to Muslim Brotherhood. And even now we have serious causes for concern.

It is obvious that mutual relationship between Hillary Clinton and her adviser is not just working, but rather emotional and intimate one (3). For the former First Lady Huma is the person with whom she can discuss her innermost secrets. And, of course, there is a feedback which means the possible future mistress of the Oval Office can be influenced by Huma Abedin as well.

On the other hand, Huma is the pride (4) of her family, she is well respected in the Muslim world amid her lesbian relationship (5) with Hillary Clinton and in spite of her marriage to Anthony Weiner who is a Jew. Such the tolerance of Muslim community to the flagrant violations of Sharia law, and Huma's own condonation of multiple sexual scandals involving her husband – all this indicates that the Hillary's aide has ulterior objects and missions: to infiltrate the United States political elite, to gather information and work as an agent of influence.

This example makes one wonder whether we do not underestimate the danger of informal relationships between our officials? What ideas Huma Abedin plants in the main Democratic presidential candidate's head? How can it affect the decisions Hillary Clinton would make if she wins? What information Huma has gained access to by virtue of her governmental employee status? For what achievements have American taxpayers paid a salary to Huma?

In 2012, Democrats and even some Republicans called Bachmann's concerns "unfounded" and "dangerous" (6) on the pretext that "it can not be truth, because…. of reasons." Indeed, no check was even done (7). At the same time, on national security grounds, isn't it better to admit complacency of our special services and – until it is too late – undertake the measures necessary to correct that mistake?

Finally, Hillary Clinton, who has been so involved in Huma's life, couldn't have been unaware of who is her passion and confidante. Is the former Secretary of State an undetected Muslim Brotherhood supporter? Or has she just been infatuated with Huma (for 20 years already)? In any case, a conclusion should be drawn about her suitability to public service in general!

(1) http://www.politico.com/story/2015/09/clinton-abedin-state-job-approved-214038 (2) http://www.sctimes.com/article/20120710/NEWS01/307100003/Bachmann-warns-Muslim-Brotherhood (3) http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/06/20/AR2007062002567_4.html (4)http://www.westernjournalism.com/huma-abedin-confirms-her-muslim-brotherhood-mom-proud-of-her-during-podcast-audio/ (5)https://www.christforums.org/forum/general-discussions/united-states/21584-lesbian-president-will-lead-america-to-decay-and-isolation (6)https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/2chambers/post/john-boehner-accusations-against-huma-abedin-pretty-dangerous/2012/07/19/gJQAeDT6vW_blog.html (7)http://www.westernjournalism.com/huma-abedin-confirms-her-muslim-brotherhood-mom-proud-of-her-during-podcast-audio/