Free Republic
Browse · Search
RLC Liberty Caucus
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ron Paul’s inclusive message attracting African American voters (HUGE black voter shift)
USA Daily ^ | 10-25-2007 | Maple Brown

Posted on 10/29/2007 11:31:08 PM PDT by OrthodoxPresbyterian

Ron Paul’s inclusive message attracting African American voters
Maple Brown, USA Daily
Published 10/25/2007 - 11:34 a.m. EDT

Ron Paul’s inclusive message of peace, freedom, and prosperity may be attracting African American voters. According to this poll, Ron Paul leads his GOP opponents among black voters in general election contests.

In general election matches Paul loses among African American voters 60% to 33% against Hillary Clinton and loses 61% to 31% to Barack Obama.

In 2004 CNN exit polls show Bush receiving 11% of the African American vote in the general election against Kerry.

The averages of general election match up against either Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama are for Paul, Romney, McCain or Giuliani are, Ron Paul - 32%, Mitt Romney - 23.5%, John McCain - 20%, Rudy Giuliani - 16%.

If the polls are accurate it could mean that Ron Paul’s message that ‘Freedom unites people’ is working. Paul’s uncompromising defense of the Bill of Rights is making him a Civil Rights Leader in his own right. ("Ron Paul inspiring new Civil Rights movements")

The poll, if accurate, could also mean that Ron Paul’s message of ‘repealing the police state’ is resonating with African American voters.

Paul does appear to be a uniting political force attracting supporters at his events from all walks of life.

USA Daily does not encourage its readers to allow polls to influence their voting decisions in any way. They are too often inaccurate. This statement is not a comment on the poll in question just on polling in general. (Discuss the election on www.usadaily.net)


TOPICS: Candidates
KEYWORDS: barf; blackvote; bravosierra; daviddukecandidate; endorsedbydu; marines; orthodoxnutcase; paulestinians; rino; rinoron; ronpaul; spambots; thedailykoscandidate; trutherron
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340341-355 next last
To: OrthodoxPresbyterian

Ping for later.


321 posted on 10/30/2007 1:57:34 PM PDT by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline of the Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

LOL. Nice pic.


322 posted on 10/30/2007 2:33:23 PM PDT by Vanbasten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 314 | View Replies]

To: Vanbasten

Hit some of the anarchist sites, they have a lot of Che/Paul stuff.


323 posted on 10/30/2007 2:37:24 PM PDT by mnehring (Ron Paul is to the Constitution what Fred Phelps is to the Bible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 322 | View Replies]

To: OrthodoxPresbyterian; All
At first all the polls and scientific field made me take this article and this publication seriously.

then I saw this article on same site and realized we are looking at a Ron Paul Front.

The Republican two man race, Ron Paul and whoever emerges to challenge him
324 posted on 10/30/2007 2:38:01 PM PDT by gondramB (Preach the Gospel at all times, and when necessary, use words.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling
Really? Gee, I would have thought that he was at least as libertarian as I am. I rated higher on the libertarian scale than he did. Maybe that's why I support him. I guess that puts me in pretty good company:

"If you analyze it I believe the very heart and soul of conservatism is libertarianism. I think conservatism is really a misnomer just as liberalism is a misnomer for the liberals–if we were back in the days of the Revolution, so-called conservatives today would be the Liberals and the liberals would be the Tories. The basis of conservatism is a desire for less government interference or less centralized authority or more individual freedom and this is a pretty general description also of what libertarianism is.

Now, I can’t say that I will agree with all the things that the present group who call themselves Libertarians in the sense of a party say, because I think that like in any political movement there are shades, and there are libertarians who are almost over at the point of wanting no government at all or anarchy. I believe there are legitimate government functions. There is a legitimate need in an orderly society for some government to maintain freedom or we will have tyranny by individuals. The strongest man on the block will run the neighborhood. We have government to insure that we don’t each one of us have to carry a club to defend ourselves. But again, I stand on my statement that I think that libertarianism and conservatism are travelling the same path." - President Ronald Reagan 1975 (Full interview)

325 posted on 10/30/2007 2:45:46 PM PDT by AngryNeighbor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 302 | View Replies]

To: John D
How can you say cut and run is 100% pro life when he votes against the partial birth abortion ban?

I think you are getting Ron Paul mixed up with Hillary. I know it is easy to do when their policies are so similar, but she is the one who voted against the partial birth abortion ban. Paul voted to allow minors to cross state lines in order to get abortions and to NOT make it a crime to kill a fetus during a crime.
326 posted on 10/30/2007 3:14:40 PM PDT by rideharddiefast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: listenhillary

Be fair, everyone knows Freepers are neocon warmongers, Paul supporters excluded of course.


327 posted on 10/30/2007 3:24:51 PM PDT by SJackson (every one shall sit in safety under his own vine and figtree, none to make him afraid,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 320 | View Replies]

To: listenhillary; mnehrling; ejonesie22; Allegra
The Paul supporter's view

An Open Letter to Michael Medved
Posted by Thomas DiLorenzo at October 28, 2007 10:20 AM

Dear Mr.Medved:

It is well known that many supporters of your radio show are deranged, bloodthirsty wackos who would like our military to drop nuclear bombs on Iran, which would kill hundreds of thousands, maybe even millions, of innocent people.

These people sometimes call themselves "Evangelical Christians," "Freepers," "Republican Party activists," "neocons," "The Heritage Foundation," "American Enterprise Institute," "Dick Cheney," "Charles Krauthammer," "William Kristol," and other creepy-sounding names.

In order to avoid gaining the reputation of a supporter of mass murder of innocents, I recommend that you immediately disassociate yourself from all these moral misfits. If not, I'm afraid you will be considered to be one of them.

Outstanding, when it comes to the unpopular, for Paul supporters, condemning neonazis, FR comes in second only to Evangelicals amongst the anti-hater loons, and ahead of neocons!

328 posted on 10/30/2007 3:56:46 PM PDT by SJackson (every one shall sit in safety under his own vine and figtree, none to make him afraid,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 320 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling
that’s why I changed my tag line

I thought you were going to use it to promote Chris Peden. Where's the loyalty? It's only been a few weeks.
329 posted on 10/30/2007 4:07:02 PM PDT by George W. Bush (Apres moi, le deluge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 315 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

oh please dont change it for me - let the world know clearly how tasteless you truly are


330 posted on 10/30/2007 4:10:08 PM PDT by Revelation 911 (300 pound Evangelical Protestant with attitude for Paul)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 315 | View Replies]

To: OrthodoxPresbyterian

33 percent of 15 percent of the country is not really huge if you consider that he will get maybe 2 percent of the caucasian vote. Luckily for the U.S., Paul loses no matter how you split the rainbow.


331 posted on 10/30/2007 4:10:11 PM PDT by JustaDumbBlonde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling
Equal protection clause for one. This bill would have applied the same legal standards to harming the unborn baby as current laws do in harming the mother. The unborn are not given equal treatment under the law, as required by the 14th Amendment.

Thanks for your reply. I guess we'll agree to disagree. I don't think our system was designed for that kind of federalization of police powers. It should be a state matter, IMO.

Do you have a response to the second part of my post? A war without popular support is not going to go well, and isn't a great campaign issue either. I know that's not a popular sentiment around here, and I'm actually a Ron Paul supporter who thinks we shouldn't withdraw our troops immediately from around the world. I know everyone is concerned about Iran and Iraq, and they're important, but I'm more concerned about telling China we're done defending Taiwan and telling N. Korea we're done defending the South. I'm also just plain concerned about Putin. It's a dangerous world, and we have troops in over 100 countries for a reason.

Still, like it or not, the question remains: how can a divided USA finish building a united Iraq out of three angry tribes, when 2/3 of the people want the troops home within a year?
332 posted on 10/30/2007 4:34:40 PM PDT by publiusF27
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 309 | View Replies]

To: Drango

ROFL!


333 posted on 10/30/2007 5:16:19 PM PDT by fortunecookie (Socialism has failed millions, it wasn't right for them - and it isn't right for US.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: OrthodoxPresbyterian

RP to within 10 points of HC...

http://tinyurl.com/25lguv
http://tinyurl.com/25lguv


334 posted on 10/30/2007 5:47:20 PM PDT by gunnyg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

*****Paul is just the in thing to follow now... Stephen Colbert may be his biggest threat.****

I have never seen a candidate get so much grass roots support, along with so much grass root money. He has raised almost half the amount of money in October as he raised last quarter. On Nov. 5, he will probably get close to $2 M on that day alone. That is worth about $10 M to Ron Paul, given his grass roots support.

I know he is still a long shot, but I am willing to put my money on him.


335 posted on 10/30/2007 9:11:19 PM PDT by jmeagan (Our last chance to change the direction of the country -- Ron Paul)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 314 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

This is some interesting info.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1918890/posts?page=1


336 posted on 10/31/2007 7:42:42 AM PDT by Vanbasten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 323 | View Replies]

To: publiusF27
Do you have a response to the second part of my post? A war without popular support is not going to go well, and isn't a great campaign issue either.

I tend to ignore talking points that mirror what one would find on DU or KOS.

337 posted on 10/31/2007 7:45:47 AM PDT by mnehring (Ron Paul is to the Constitution what Fred Phelps is to the Bible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 332 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush

Did OP get sent to the corner for posting this thread ?


338 posted on 10/31/2007 1:43:33 PM PDT by Revelation 911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 270 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling
Ron Paul on the issues.
339 posted on 10/31/2007 1:51:03 PM PDT by KDD (A nod is as good as a wink to a blind horse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 302 | View Replies]

To: KDD
Ron Paul's Votes On The Issues
340 posted on 10/31/2007 1:54:23 PM PDT by mnehring (Ron Paul is to the Constitution what Fred Phelps is to the Bible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 339 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340341-355 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
RLC Liberty Caucus
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson