Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Church still attracting converts: CHN at record levels
The Wanderer ^ | 10/10/02 | Paul Likoudis

Posted on 11/18/2002 8:34:02 AM PST by pseudo-justin

Church Is Still Attracting Converts

By PAUL LIKOUDIS

A personal note: The phone rang the other day and the gentleman on the other end identified himself as Jim Anderson from the Coming Home Network. He said he had a message from an old high school friend. Who might that be, I asked, and he gave the name: Dion Berlowitz.

Anderson told me the Coming Home Network, with which I was not familiar, helped Protestants come into the Church, and that Dion was on his way in.

I hadn’t heard from Dion in more than a decade, even though we were best friends at Williamsville South High School, outside Buffalo, sharing several interests, including cartooning and comic books. Raised Jewish, Dion became a born-again Christian in his junior year of high school as his parents’ marriage broke up, and spent hours, days, weeks, and months trying to convert me into a Bible-believing Christian.

In 1971, Dion went on to the University of Buffalo to study literature and I went on to Eisenhower College to study history, and our paths never crossed again until a call out of the blue came from him around 1990, when he told me he was a Presbyterian. We have had no further contact since, though I suspect and hope that will change.

In this initial conversation, Anderson told me that so far, this year, the Coming Home Network has helped 94 Protestant ministers of various denominations, along with many other Protestants, come into the Church. Some, like Dion, are on their way in. This is the largest annual crop since the CHNetwork was founded nine years ago.

Here, in a year in which the Catholic Church in the United States and around the world has been wracked by scandals, we do have good news indeed.

+ + +

What would prompt a Protestant, especially a minister with a wife and family, to leave his tradition and often his livelihood to come into the Catholic Church, especially when there are so many broken-hearted Catholics embarrassed by the past ten months of sordid revelations involving clerical sexual abuse, bishops’ resignations, episcopal cover-ups and pay-outs? Not to mention the ongoing abuse of authority by bishops to hammer the lay faithful who object to dissidents and heretics speaking in parishes and education conferences.

"For Protestants," says Jim Anderson, "the scandals are a non-issue. Among the hundreds of people I have talked to who are thinking of coming into the Church, the scandals just aren’t an issue. Of all the people who have contacted me, only three or four have mentioned them, and that was only at my prompting.

"To a man, these men are intellectually convinced that the Church is a divine institution established by Christ, and bishops are only human — and, besides, they say, ‘These things are going on in our own denominations — only in our denomination they are not being addressed.’

"They see this as the Holy Spirit cleaning house. The judgment of the Lord begins with the family of God. They view the present scandals as a terrible tragedy; they want justice like everybody else. But as far as the truth of the Catholic faith is concerned, it is a non-issue. It’s sin; it needs to be addressed. And that’s it.

"These men," he continued, "are educated people. Most have master of divinity degrees and doctorates. They are aware of the problems, but once their hearts are converted and they see the Church as Jesus Christ’s, they know Christ will keep His promise. They have experienced troubles in their own denominations, but they know that when they are in the Church, God will prevail."

On average — based on the first ten months of this year — Anderson hears from a Protestant minister every three days who has made the decision to become Catholic.

Most, he says, are drawn to the Church for two reasons. Either they have come to understand the dead end to which the Protestant doctrine of sola scriptura leads, and they want to settle, in their own minds, the issue of authority in the Church; or they have been led to the Church by its doctrine of the Real Presence of Christ in the Eucharist, and they want to receive Jesus.

What many Protestants are coming to understand, even at a time when many Catholics and non-Catholics lament the apparent breakdown of authority in the Church, Anderson explained, is that the Church’s authority "is set by God."

"Those who take their faith and Scripture and God seriously," he said, "see the Catholic Church as being the answer to the chaos of the Protestant condition: Sola scriptura is a dead end, is unhistorical and unworkable. They understand this and so they have a crisis of faith and they enter the Catholic Church. And this is occurring across the Protestant spectrum. A lot of people contacting the Coming Home Network are ‘higher church’ Episcopalians or Lutherans, but we do get calls also from ‘low-end’ Baptists, Seventh-day Adventists, and Assembly of God ministers.

"To speak, as some Catholics do, about a ‘crisis of authority’ in the Church doesn’t make a lot of sense," Anderson said. "There is a ‘crisis of obedience to authority,’ but that has always been the case, just as there has always been a ‘crisis of obedience to the authority of God’ on the part of many men and women. The authority is there, and it is working; it is just not obeyed."

The Coming Home Support Network

The Coming Home Network was founded in 1993 out of the experiences of several Protestant clergy and their spouses. Upon leaving their pastorates to enter the Catholic Church, these clergy and their families discovered they were not alone. To help others come into the Church — and to deal with some of the tremendous personal and professional obstacles they faced — they began the organization as a support network.

Catholics, Anderson suggested, should understand some of the challenges these ministers face once they have made the intellectual decision to "cross over" to Rome.

"They go through tremendous struggles. They think, ‘I’m losing my friends, my family, my community, my church, and people think I’m crazy and I’m apostatizing from Christianity.’ Often the most serious conflict is with spouses, who not only have to deal with the change of religion, but have practical problems as well, such as, ‘What about me and the children?’ ‘How are we going to survive?’ ‘What will our friends think?’ ‘Have I been following the wrong religion all my life?’

"Most of these people have M.Div. and Ph.D. degrees, and so they are not employable in the world. It’s a difficult decision for these men to give up their work, their careers, and their livelihoods. Nevertheless, 94 this year have entered, or are on their way into, the Church."

One former minister, Anderson recalled, gave up his role as a prominent, prestigious minister for his community to work as a greeter at WalMart. For him, the blessing of being able to receive the Eucharist more than compensated for what he had to give up.

Anderson is well-prepared for his work helping Protestants come into the Church. Reared as a Methodist, the 47-year-old Anderson became a Lutheran at 19. As a history major specializing in medieval Europe at Ohio University in Athens, he knew he was on his way into the Church.

Three years after graduating, he entered evangelical Ashland Seminary in 1980, interested in pursuing studies in ecumenical dialog. In his freshman year, he made the decision to join the Catholic Church, and on July 25, 1981, the Feast of St. James, he was confirmed. His wife, Lynn, who entered the Church in 1983, now teaches in a Catholic school.

Contrary to popular stereotypes, he said, the biggest roadblocks would-be converts confront are not such "hot-button" issues as contraception, papal infallibility, or women’s rights, but the Church’s doctrines concerning Mary.

But another obstacle, he said, is "liturgical craziness."

Many Protestants, he said, "are scandalized by the liturgical craziness. They try to get around it by seeking out a Byzantine rite, or seeking out orthodox parishes. And usually, if they come into the Church, having been good Protestants, they have church-hopped enough to have found a parish where they don’t have to deal with abuses."

But, he added, many look beyond the abuses, because "they are attracted to Christ in the liturgy. For a lot of the converts, there are many who have intellectually convinced themselves already that they must join the Church before they ever attended Mass. And when they finally start going to Mass, often there is a culture shock, especially if they come from a small, intimate, loving Baptist church, and go into a parish of 2,000 people who aren’t particularly friendly. So there is this bit of culture shock — and that doesn’t include the shock of liturgy."

Asked to name the leading intellectual sources Protestants are reading to find their way into the Church, Anderson named familiar names.

"The intellectual sources are, certainly, Cardinal Newman, G.K. Chesterton, Bishop Fulton Sheen, Scott Hahn, and Catholic Answers.

"But most often, it is the fathers of the Church. When Protestant ministers encounter the fathers, they realize they were lied to and betrayed, because they were taught the Protestant Reformation cleansed Christianity of the barnacles on the Barque of Peter and the Reformers recovered ancient Christianity. Then they go back and read the apostolic fathers, especially Ignatius of Antioch who is preaching the Real Presence, the authority of bishops, and all these many Catholic things, and the conclusion is the words of Jesus, who says: ‘I will be with you always.’

"Either Jesus kept His promise, or the Church went to Hell in a hand basket after the death of St. John.

"When they start studying the early Church fathers, they are blown out of the water."

Solid Apologetics

The Coming Home Network’s executive director is former Presbyterian minister Marcus Grodi, who, captured the feeling and beliefs of many fellow Protestants who came into the Church in his book, Journeys Home (Queenship Publishing 1997).

"[T]he biggest thing that opened my heart to the truth of the Catholic faith was not all the apologetic arguments that convinced me of the trustworthiness of Catholic truth, but the realization that the Catholic Church, with all of her saints and sinners, was exactly what Christ had promised.

"The majority of complaints against the Catholic Church over the centuries have been aimed at the decisions and actions of bad Popes, or immoral clergy, or ignorant laity, or corrupt Catholic nobility, and the correct answer to this is, ‘But, of course! The Church is made up of wheat and tares, from the bottom to the top, sinners in need of grace! This is no reason to leave and form a new church, for any church made up of human beings is made up of sinners.’

"All true conversions to the Catholic faith from any other starting point carry with them complications, primarily because this conversion must be rooted in and thereby an extension of one’s conversion and surrender to Christ. If becoming a Catholic does not involve this, I don’t believe it is a true conversion. It might be a change of convenience or even possibly for some sort of personal gain or aggrandizement.

"But only when one recognizes or painfully discovers that to be fully a follower of Jesus Christ, and thereby have the full potential of growing in union with Him, one must also be in union with the Church He established in and through His Apostles, can one be truly converted.

"These conversions by definition must involve some extent of leaving behind and rejecting part of what a person once held very dear. Some things can be joyfully brought along, others can be cautiously tolerated, but yet there are ideas, practices, and sometimes even relationships which must be severed.

"It of course never means that we cease to love those we may need to leave behind, or who choose to turn their backs on us. In fact, we are called all the more to shower our now confused or indignant friends and family with the all-forgiving, all-accepting love of Christ. However, we must not let the emotional trajectories of our loving glances turn our attention off of the fullness of truth found only in union with the Catholic Church."

For more information about the Coming Home Network, go to its web site, www.chnetwork.org, or call 740-450-1175.


TOPICS: Catholic
KEYWORDS: catholiclist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 401-414 next last
To: AlguyA
Al, you know abortion isn't in there. Even THEY know it isn't in there.

They misused it and you know it. There's a range of reasonable answers which are possible. Once one goes outside the range, then I can see for myself what's happened.

Good thing to know. Glad we have a written document.
61 posted on 11/18/2002 3:18:54 PM PST by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: xzins
"Glad we have a written document."

And exactly how has that written document helped the 40 million innocents whose lives have been ended by abortion?

62 posted on 11/18/2002 3:21:07 PM PST by AlguyA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: AlguyA
By my knowing it wasn't written there; that I don't have to accept that to be a good american; that it's the result of a power play by a deceiver enemy. Al you seem like A good Guy. But on this one, you seem to be arguing we throw out the Constitution.
63 posted on 11/18/2002 3:30:22 PM PST by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Well, your standards might or might not mean something. I, however, am talking about ME.

I am talking about you too, and I am wondering why you do not recognize that the exegetical methods you have internalized from your Protestant tradition has implications for whether you find any scriptural proofs concering Marian doctrines convincing. Have you read this book:

Catholic for a Reason II: Scripture and the Mystery of the Mother of God by Leon Suprenant Jr. (Editor), Beth Hart (Illustrator).

It is available through amazon.com

Could you tell me what you do not find convincing about these particular arguments? This book in particular should be of interest to you, because most if not all of the contributors are minister-converts of the sort discussed in the article posted on this thread. What exactly is unconvincing about, say, Revelation 12? All I am asking is for you to identify the source of the unconvincingness of the arguments that have been presented to you. I really would like to know for future reference.

As for the questions about the consitution, Congress, and majority rule, you have already drawn a false analogy. As I pointed out earlier, many Protestants have this image of the Catholic Church such that Scripture is not a chief part of the life of the Chruch Like the bible fell out of the sky in the sixteenth century and people first began reading it--and only Protestants began reading it of course. This is just a false analogy . The Catholic Church is not living without Scripture, not forming its doctrines without Scripture, not lacking in a an army of people who are reading reflecting, and contemplating Scripture. That you would even draw such an analogy shows that you imagine the Church to be a Scriptureless entity. Do you have any idea how deeply Scriputre figures into the Church's teachings? Just look at any systematic textbook on Catholic dogma. Better yet, look at the Catechism. It is saturated with Scripture from the first paragraph to the last. To even draw the analogy that you have drawn makes it look like we do not care for Scripture, we have nothing but arbitrary human judgment to go on, that the Bishops are not beholden to the Scripture, and that is just plain false.

64 posted on 11/18/2002 3:59:48 PM PST by pseudo-justin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: pseudo-justin
Nope, but I just finishe "Hail Holy Queen" by Scott Hahn. He's down my alley. A protestant (as per this thread) who turned to the other side. I thought if anyone could explain it, he could.

But all he gave were arguments....not proof.

I didn't form a false analogy with the Constitution, because I didn't say Catholics weren't informed by the Holy Scriptures. I do NOT believe they aren't informed by them. Hahn's writings that I've read are full of them.

We consider them decisively authoritative OVER the church. You consider the Church decisively authoritative OVER the scripture. I've seen (and been a part of) the discussions on some of these threads on that subject.

My argument is that the scriptures are the CLEAR apostolic authority extant in the world today. The apostles always had authority over the church. Therefore, the writings of the apostles have priority over the church.

Others have had arguments that have attempted to dissuade me from that conclusion, but none have had arguments that I found as persuasive.

In any case, you've been a fair discussion partner. Do you realize we have YELLED at or attempted to DEMONIZE each other even once.
65 posted on 11/18/2002 4:43:53 PM PST by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: xzins
"But all he gave were arguments....not proof."

What constitutes proof for you if not arguments?
66 posted on 11/18/2002 4:53:10 PM PST by Tantumergo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Tantumergo
Proof is "case closed" information.

Other than that there are arguments. He has his. I have mine. I weight them and then weigh them.

I've found no reason to change what I believe after that process.

"Arguments" have a "probability" of being correct. Proof is a certainty of correctness. Does that help?
67 posted on 11/18/2002 4:56:41 PM PST by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: xzins
""Arguments" have a "probability" of being correct. Proof is a certainty of correctness."

Is not "certainty" a subjective state of mind?

If one could derive certainty from Scripture alone then there would be no disagreement as to its meaning.

68 posted on 11/18/2002 5:07:30 PM PST by Tantumergo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: xzins; Codie; Desdemona
excuses, excuses. The past is over, isn't it. The future starts now. You're not gonna do some medieval poor guy and favor by selling the gold staff he paid for with his poverty.

You just don't get it do you? If you would reflect on the culture then and contrast it with our current culture a light may come on. If you do that and don't get my point, you are truly clueless.

69 posted on 11/18/2002 5:23:35 PM PST by pegleg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Tantumergo
Well, some things are not subjective and are absolute fact in space/time. For example, I absolutely was born on a particular day. It is also a fact that if my airplane runs out of gas while I'm in the air that it will come down to the ground shortly thereafter.

Doctrinal fact is a different animal, isn't it? We almost need a continuum to help us ascertain where WE stand on certain things being in the realm of fact rather than assumption. Let 10 be a certain fact. Let 0 be a wild, totally unsupportable assumption.

Where would you place "the bodily resurrection of Jesus Christ?" I think the testimony of scripture and the church is certain on this one. It gets a 10.

Where would you place "the full inspiration of scripture by God?" I would give it a 10.

Where would you place "the visit of Jesus to the New World ancestors of mormonism?" I would give it a big fat ZERO (0).

I'm sure you see the process.

Out of curiosity where would you place "the trinity?"

70 posted on 11/18/2002 5:31:28 PM PST by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: pegleg
Culture doesn't count with Jesus.

He didn't pick women to be elders because he didn't want to. Not because the "culture" made him nervous.

He wouldn't smile on misusing God's money whether it was 1st century Judaism (Ananias & Saphira), 15th century Europe (gold & gem-studded scepters), or 21st century Boston (legal payments to victims of abuse; huge expenses for crystal cathedrals; ripping off of retirees in Jim Bakker retirement scams.)

I am not clueless. I'm actually rather friendly and have been so throughout.
71 posted on 11/18/2002 5:36:28 PM PST by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: xzins
He didn't pick women to be elders because he didn't want to.

How do you know that?

72 posted on 11/18/2002 5:40:19 PM PST by Codie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: xzins
I'm actually rather friendly and have been so throughout.

Ok

You consider the Church decisively authoritative OVER the scripture.

So which came first, the Church or the New Testament?

73 posted on 11/18/2002 5:46:12 PM PST by pegleg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Codie
Because he was courageous. If he'd wanted to, he would have. Besides, the fact that he didn't is preliminary evidence that he didn't want to. After all, he was God.

After all, his courage and conviction enabled him to go to a cross he knew would happen to him.
74 posted on 11/18/2002 5:46:59 PM PST by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: pegleg; BibChr
The Apostles came first. Their testimony precedes the Church and was the accepted rule over the church. Their writings ARE their testimony.

After their deaths, the believers VERIFIED those writings that were the apostles. The believers did NOT write those writings.

Once full body of the word of the apostles was identified, the believers had to become subject to the testimony of the apostles.
75 posted on 11/18/2002 5:52:50 PM PST by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Perhaps he knew what would happen if women were placed in authority over men.JMHO.
76 posted on 11/18/2002 5:55:28 PM PST by Codie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: xzins
The Apostles came first. Their testimony precedes the Church and was the accepted rule over the church. Their writings ARE their testimony.

What Church?

77 posted on 11/18/2002 5:56:00 PM PST by pegleg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: LibertyGirl77
Maybe when someone gives me a Biblically-sound reason to attempt to communicate with Mary or win her favor, I'll give the Catholic Church a second look. But until then, I will remain faithful to the Word and nothing else.

Try this situation on. You fall in love with a wonderful man. He wants you to meet his mother and father; introduce you to his brothers, sisters, cousins, favorite uncle, etc. I suppose you would refuse him on the grounds that you only "love him" and you don't need all those other people? Will meeting and making room in your live for his family somehow dilute the "personal" nature of your relationship with your beloved? Of course not.

That is what the protestant refusal to get to know the Blessed Mother and the Saints is like to me.

78 posted on 11/18/2002 6:01:10 PM PST by Nubbin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Codie
Whatever the reason(s), he didn't do it.

Nothing wrong with your idea, imho. Hey, Codie, are you male or female? (I'm male) It makes a difference on this particular issue. The only reason I ask.
79 posted on 11/18/2002 6:03:48 PM PST by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: pegleg
Do you mean denomination???
80 posted on 11/18/2002 6:04:46 PM PST by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 401-414 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson