Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Making Your Calling and Election Sure
http://www.heatandlight.org/slj/new_testament/2peter/tape1b.htm ^ | S. Lewis Johnson, Jr.

Posted on 11/06/2002 1:47:26 PM PST by drstevej

NOTE: This is the conclusion of a sermon (see url for entire sermon.)

=======

The Calling and Election by God

Let us stop for a moment to consider this word, "calling."  To what does Peter refer when he speaks about our calling?  The apostle Paul has referred to our calling in the epistle to the Romans.  Our calling is the work of the Holy Spirit in bringing us to the knowledge of the Lord Jesus.  The apostle Paul wrote, "For whom he did foreknow, he also did predestinate to be conformed to the image of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brethren. 30Moreover whom he did predestinate, them he also called: and whom he called, them he also justified: and whom he justified, them he also glorified." (Ro 8:29-30 KJV).  So we have five great acts of God:  foreknowledge, predestination, calling, justification, and glorification.  Calling then is the work of the Holy Spirit and is always efficacious when it is written about in the epistles.  That is, it is always a calling to which its recipients respond.  Calling is the work of the Holy Spirit in bringing us to faith in the Lord Jesus and to justification of life. 

There are two types of callings found in the Bible.  There is the general calling of the preaching of the gospel to the whole of the world.  Then there is the special calling by which the Holy Spirit speaks to the hearts of the elect.  Here in 2 Peter 1:10, this is of course is a reference to the special calling.  Make your calling and election sure.  Peter talks about calling first and election second and I will address this in a moment, but let us look first at the word election

The Tremendous Doctrine of Election

Election is a word that causes such a great deal of controversy.  I don't know why.  It is one of the greatest doctrines in the Bible and has been a great deal of comfort to me all through my Christian experience.  I never have thought that anyone ought to be angry over the doctrine of election.  Surprisingly, there are people who get very incensed over the doctrine of election. 

I was so pleased about two weeks ago when I got a letter from a businessman which was eleven pages long.  He was apparently a very wealthy businessman who was president of a large corporation.  He was interested in the Five Points of Calvinism.  He had heard on tape a message or two that I had given on efficacious grace.  He was so thrilled over it that he wrote me these eleven pages and asked me to criticize his doctrine.  He was rejoicing in the doctrine of election, having become a real student of the Bible.  He had only been converted a few years ago, but is evidently a man of some age.  Why people don't love the doctrine of election, I simply don't know.  John Calvin wrote, "They who shut the gates that no one may dare seek a taste of this doctrine, wrong men no less than God."  So I would not want to wrong you, by not saying something about the doctrine of election.  I want you to enjoy it.  It is one of the great truths of the Word of God.  It is the fountain from which all of our blessings come.  They all go back to that choice that God made in the councils of eternity.  So why should we not love the doctrine of election?  I believe all the true saints, when this doctrine is presented as it is in the Word of God, do in fact love it. 

Unfortunately, election is often presented in such a way that it is no wonder that people do not like it.  I traveled home after the message Sunday morning at about 1:20 PM.  I got in my car just outside the church building, turned on my radio and listened to a program that came on in which the teacher spoke on election.  He referred to election, but his doctrine of election was disturbing.  He said, "Election is very simple.  In election, God is voting for you, and the Devil is voting against you.  And which ever way you vote - that's the election."  That is what the man said.  Now it is no wonder that a person doesn't get any joy out of that particular doctrine of election because if you know anything about the nature of Man, you know that we will never vote the right way.  That is not the doctrine of election.  What this man was teaching comes straight out of the mouth of Pelagius (who was a heretic during the time of Augustine).  Unfortunately, there are a lot of people who have that idea of election.  They think of it just as Pelagian as that, i.e., that the source of our salvation rests with Man rather than with God.  That is horrible doctrine.  That is strongly anti-biblical doctrine.  If you have some ideas like the kind that this man put forth, they do not come from God, I assure you. 

Election is election to the church of the first born who will be in heaven.  Incidentally, if you think that I am stretching this a little bit by telling you that you should rejoice in the doctrine of election, then I refer you to someone who told me to rejoice in election.  I will just read his comments:

20Notwithstanding in this rejoice not, that the spirits are subject unto you; but rather rejoice, because your names are written in heaven. (The words of Jesus, Lk 10:20 KJV)

Who said this?  The Lord Jesus said this, and He told them to rejoice because their names are written in heaven.  Hallelujah!  I am rejoicing because my name is written in heaven.  Election is a tremendous doctrine.  Our text in 2 Peter says, "make your calling and election sure."  After all that I have said, it seems that we are stooping to a very human plane.  After stressing that election comes from God, and then to read in this text, "make your calling and election sure," it demands some explanation.

The Human Perspective on Divine Election

In the first place, this is no question that this is something that we are to do.  In the Greek text, the expression in the tenth verse, "give diligence to make…"  That verb in Greek is in what we call the middle voice.  It can be translated most accurately as, "give diligence to make for/by yourselves…"  So the stress rests upon what we do.  Make for yourselves your calling and election sure.  How can we possibly make our calling and election sure? 

Did you notice the order of the words in verse 1:10?  He did not write, "make your election and calling sure," rather "your calling and election sure."  Now calling occurs in time.  Election occurs in eternity past.  So you can see here at the beginning, that there is a kind of order that suggests that what we are dealing with here is the human side of election (God's choosing).  The way we experience or come to the knowledge of election is by coming first of all to the knowledge of our calling.  In other words, we come to know that we are elect after we come to know that we have been saved. We do not know that we are elect before we know that we are saved.  We come to know our election after we come to know our salvation.  That is the Christian experience.  We come to know that we are saved, then we come to know from the Scripture that we have been elected in eternity past.  Not the time of our election, but our knowledge of it follows our knowledge of our salvation. 

This is a substantial clue.  You can see then that Peter is not talking about this from the divine perspective, rather he writes from the human standpoint.  He is concerned about how the person comes to the knowledge of his or her election.  To make my divinely decreed election certain for myself is simply a matter of assurance.  How do I make my calling or election sure?  I do this through the demonstration in my life of the products of salvation.  That is what Peter goes on to say.  "Make your calling and election sure, for if you do these things you will never stumble" (2 Pe 1:10). 

One of the evidences that we are truly elect of God is the product of our life.  That is what Peter is speaking about when he tells us to make our calling and election sure.  He is simply telling us to give all diligence to make sure that the virtues about which he had just previously mentioned issue from our lives.  When these virtues issue from our lives as a result of our salvation then it is through this that we have assurance in our calling and election.  The apostle John says the same thing except with a slightly different emphasis when he writes, "14We know that we have passed from death unto life, because we love the brethren…." (1 Jn 3:14 KJV)  Or as James says similarly, "Faith without works is dead."  (James 2:20)  Or when Paul writes, "For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: 9Not of works, lest any man should boast. 10For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God hath before ordained that we should walk in them." (Eph 2:8-10 KJV)

So when we make our calling and election sure it means nothing more than that there should be a demonstration in our lives of the product of divine grace.  It is through the product of divine grace that we recognize the reality of the source, i.e., our election and our calling.  This is a very needed and necessary thing.  In fact, the one who does not have any evidence in his Christian life has no reason to think that he does really belong to God.  Let me read you something from Benjamin Breckenridge Warfield, who says:

Accordingly, Peter exhorts us to make our calling and election sure, precisely by diligence of good works.  He doesn't mean that by good works we may secure from God a decree of election on our behalf.  He means that by expanding the germ of spiritual life which we have received from God into full efflorescence (full flowering), by working out our salvation.  Of course, not without Christ but in Christ we can make ourselves sure that we have really received the election to which we make claim.  The salvation of God being a salvation and sanctification of the spirit ought, when worked out, to manifest itself in such forms as faith, virtue, knowledge, temperance, patience, godliness, brotherly love and love.  By working out the salvation which we have received into such a symphony of good works, we make sure that it is the very salvation to which God has chosen His people.  Good works become thus, the mark and test of election.  And when taken in the comprehensive sense in which Peter is here thinking of them, they are the only marks and tests of election.  We can never know that we are elected of God to eternal life except by manifesting in our lives the fruits of election:  faith and virtue, knowledge and temperance, patience and godliness, love of the brethren and that essential love that does not put limits to its object.  He that gives diligence to cultivating such things in his life will not stumble in the way, for it is with such things in their hands that men enter into the eternal kingdom of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ.  It is idle to seek assurance of election outside of holiness of life. 

Now there is one correction I would like to make to this, one slight correction.  It is possible for a person who has believed in the Lord Jesus - for that settles the question of salvation and is evidence for election, for only the elect believe - and for us to see no evidence in the life.  We must never forget this.  We must not, as a matter of fact, look around and test the fruit in the lives of others.  God has not called us to check the fruitfulness of other trees planted by the Lord.  However, in the final analysis the man who has truly believed must manifest in his life, whether it is seen by us or not, evidence of the reality of the decision that has brought life. 

Now then, Peter says in verse 1:11, "For so an entrance shall be ministered unto you abundantly into the everlasting kingdom of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ." (2 Pe 1:8-11 KJV)  Those who do these things shall not fall.  That is, they will not lose fellowship, but shall have an abundant entrance into the Messianic Kingdom of the Lord Jesus.  What great words to excite a weary pilgrim! 

I do not want in any way to suggest, that these words that I have conveyed to you would create any doubt about your election.  If you have truly believed in the Lord Jesus, that is the proof that you are elect, that you have been called.  But we cannot ultimately have any real assurance if this does not manifest itself in a transformed life.  Both of these emphases are in the Word of God, and we must not forget them.  This then has to do with assurance. 

There is no contradiction between the election of God and our making it sure.  One is the Godward side, the other is the manward side.  There is a contradiction between mere intellectual appreciation and no moral application of the truth.  The cure is if you do these things.  There may be some of you who cannot make your calling and election sure.  You have not been called; and not having been called, you have no assurance.  You cannot make your calling and election sure until you have come to faith in the Lord Jesus Christ.  Your responsibility is to come.  In receiving the Lord Jesus, who died for sinners; in that act of faith produced by God the Spirit, is the consummation of your calling and the evidence of your election.  Then our Lord's word for you is, "Rejoice! Rejoice!"

(Excerpt) Read more at heatandlight.org ...


TOPICS: General Discusssion
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 221-226 next last
To: SoothingDave; the_doc
***#1, please read what I wrote --- I said that God makes the first move. Did you consider this at all?***

Yep, I read it. I JUDGED it a lie and moved on as it perverts the Truth of the scriptures.

***#2, I don't believe anyone is dead until the end. Original sin is a damag, not a death. So there are no "corpses" around to grab paddles.***

The Lie of Eden is coming right out of your mouth. Man is merely sick on the bed and fully able to grab the paddles which the good Physician has provided. He is fully able to save himself using the tools that the Physician has graciously provided.

***God offers and God respects our freedom.***

You sound just like this Arminian: "God votes for me and Satan votes against me and I get to cast the deciding vote."

It seems that Pelagianism is alive and well in the Catholic church.
101 posted on 11/07/2002 2:28:50 PM PST by theAmbassador
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain; the_doc; Jean Chauvin; RnMomof7; sheltonmac; SoothingDave; ...

Calvinism goes into a realm of human philosophy. It is NOT a Bible doctrine, but a system of human philosophy appealing somewhat to the proud mind. Consider first that what we are discussing is called "Calvinism." "It was Calvin who wrought out this system of theological thought with such logical clearness and emphasis that it has ever since borne his name".

How strange that, after 1,400 years of Christianity, practically no one had understood the Bible to teach Calvin's doctrine of predestination until he formed the philosophy! What a strangely hidden doctrine, that New Testament Christians could go for nearly for 1400 years until the days of the reformers, when Calvin developed the doctrine fully.

It is obvious that great groups of Christians have always found salvation by grace in the Bible. The Bible is very clear on that. It is also clear on every other great doctrine.
~ BigMack

Whatever. Calvinism managed to get its name from John Calvin, but Calvinism is the doctrine of the Bible; it is the doctrine of Peter; it is the doctrine of Paul; it is the doctrine of John; it is the doctrine of Jesus. Here is a small list of Calvinistic teaching from historical Biblical Predestinarians: you are redeemed...Iftherefore ye are bought with blood, thou art not of the number of them who were bought with blood, O Manes, because thou deniest the blood...He gave His life for His own sheep.
[Epiphanius on those who rejected the gospel in A.D. 390]
102 posted on 11/07/2002 5:14:39 PM PST by CCWoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave; PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain; the_doc; drstevej; RnMomof7; sheltonmac; ...

Which is a big, convoluted way of saying God likes them best. Calvin's god knows you need a cheescake to enter heaven, but he won't give you one. And you are supposed to be happy about this, cause this god made you not want cheesecake in the first place. ~ SoothingDave

No Dave, God did not make man to hate him. This is just another sad lie from the enemies of the Truth who can't debate honestly, but must scurry around in the darkness spreading lies. Try again!

As for the first part of your so called argument, you have yet to address what I actually said. Here, let me rephrase:

Therefore, why should you complain if you are not offered cheesecake?

103 posted on 11/07/2002 5:47:53 PM PST by CCWoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave

I'm gonna say #1. Am I right? ~ SoothingDave

Well, what does the Bible teach:

  1. Does God justify the ungodly?
  2. Does God justify the godly?

104 posted on 11/07/2002 5:52:24 PM PST by CCWoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7; SoothingDave; PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain; xzins; drstevej; the_doc; ...

Many Disciples Turn Away


  • "No one can come to Me unless the Father who sent Me draws him; and I will raise him up at the last day." (John 6:44)

  • "All that the Father gives Me shall come to Me, and the one who comes to Me I will certainly not cast out." (John 6:37)

Gordon Clark

You might be reading this and beginning to seethe. How dare that I suggest that such a thing is so! You are in some interesting company. As Jesus said these things, the Jews who are listening to Him also began to seethe and to grumble. They were ready to believe that Jesus is a miracle-worker. But they could not believe that He is the Son of God who came down from heaven. They will come to Him to eat the food as He feeds the five thousand, but they will not come to Him to receive the bread of life.

It has been said that the man who chokes on the doctrine of election has not yet swallowed the truth of his own depravity. As a sinner, man is totally helpless to turn to God for help. It is God who first turns him toward Himself so that he will even begin to seek a cure. Therefore it is only when a man is drawn by God that he will come to Jesus and be saved.

Holy Scriptures

Jesus answered and said to them, "Do not grumble among yourselves. No one can come to Me, unless the Father who sent Me draws Him; and I will raise him up on the last day."

"But there are some of you who do not believe." For Jesus knew from the beginning who they were who did not believe, and who would betray Him. And He said, "Therefore I have said to you that no one can come to Me unless it has been granted to him by My Father."

From that time many of His disciples went back and walked with Him no more.

The truths of Calvinism turn people away. There it is in black and white for all to see; Jesus used the preaching of the truth of Predestination to expose the enemies of the cross of Christ: whose end is destruction, whose god is their belly, and whose glory is in their shame--who set their mind on earthly things.

105 posted on 11/07/2002 6:03:39 PM PST by CCWoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain

The Scriptures are also very plain in stating that "whosoever will" may come to Christ. ~ BigMack

Well, sure! Did you actually think that any Calvinist here would disagree with this. I quoted these verses to an Arminian once. His name is unimportant (faith_j). He actually went nuts on me posting a private e-mail I had sent him and accusing me of all kinds of stuff.

Now that we have that straightened out, you need to address the point I have made. The cheesecake is freely available for anybody who wants it. Unfortunately:

Therefore, why should you complain if you are not offered cheesecake?

106 posted on 11/07/2002 6:11:26 PM PST by CCWoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: CCWoody
Awesome list of EARLY church Fathers. I ~think~ Trent cursed most of them though

According to the 1913 edition of the "Catholic Encyclopedia," when the Catholic Church anathematizes someone, the Pope ritually puts curses on them and sentences them to hell. There is a solemn written ritual for doing this. The Catholic Church believes that God has given it the power and the authority to keep people out of Heaven, and to condemn them to hell. The anathema ritual demonstrates this belief.

In pronouncing the anathema, the Pope wears special vestments. He is assisted by twelve priests holding lighted candles. Calling on the name of God the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, the Pope pronounces a solemn ecclesiastical curse. He ends by declaring, "We judge him condemned to eternal fire with Satan and his angels and all the reprobate". The priests reply, "Fiat!" and throw down their candles.

The Catholic Church considers heresy (disagreement with Catholic doctrine) to be a crime. The Council of Trent, and other Church councils, declare that any person who disagrees with even one of their doctrinal statements is thereby anathematized. When the Pope pronounces an anathema, he is said to be passing sentence on a criminal.

Canon 12 reads as follows: "If anyone says that justifying faith is nothing else than confidence in divine mercy, which remits sins for Christ's sake, or that it is this confidence alone that justifies us, let him be anathema."

I think they may have caught some of their own in THAT net:>)
107 posted on 11/07/2002 6:34:59 PM PST by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: CCWoody
Thanks for that informative post!
108 posted on 11/07/2002 10:16:33 PM PST by sheltonmac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: theAmbassador
***#1, please read what I wrote --- I said that God makes the first move. Did you consider this at all?***

Yep, I read it. I JUDGED it a lie and moved on as it perverts the Truth of the scriptures.

I see you are not worth the effort either. Surely debate is much more winnable when you simply assume the other party is lying.

***#2, I don't believe anyone is dead until the end. Original sin is a damag, not a death. So there are no "corpses" around to grab paddles.***

The Lie of Eden is coming right out of your mouth. Man is merely sick on the bed and fully able to grab the paddles which the good Physician has provided. He is fully able to save himself using the tools that the Physician has graciously provided.

Hey, if you have a problem with the Truth, take it up with God.

And BTW, if we need "the tools that the Physician has graciously provided," then we are in no way saving ourselves.

I'm sorry you disavow free will, but I understand it makes you feel better to have absolutely no responsibility.

***God offers and God respects our freedom.***

You sound just like this Arminian: "God votes for me and Satan votes against me and I get to cast the deciding vote."

Actually, it is a different concept, but when all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail, doesn't it?

The evidence of our free will is overwhelming, I will never understand how the Calvinist can deny it.

SD

109 posted on 11/08/2002 5:52:36 AM PST by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: CCWoody
I'm gonna say #1. Am I right? ~ SoothingDave

Well, what does the Bible teach:

1. Does God justify the ungodly?
2. Does God justify the godly?

Are you dense? I answered already. I said, and you quoted me "#1."

You presented two choices and labeled them "1" and "2."

I answered "#1."

What is the difficulty in understanding the question that made you ask it again, though I had clearly answered it?

SD

110 posted on 11/08/2002 5:54:28 AM PST by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: CCWoody
The cheesecake is freely available for anybody who wants it. Unfortunately:

And no one, having feasted on rib eyes desires cheesecake; for he says, "I'm stuffed from the rib eyes."

Therefore, why should you complain if you are not offered cheesecake?

Probably because you don't teach that the cheesecake is freely available for anyone who wants it. Rather your god refuses service to certain people, arbitrarily.

That's unbecoming of a divine being.

SD

111 posted on 11/08/2002 6:10:22 AM PST by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave; the_doc; Jean Chauvin; RnMomof7
***And BTW, if we need "the tools that the Physician has graciously provided," then we are in no way saving ourselves.***

Sure you are! Who gets to boast, the paddles or the one who shocks the heart back to life?

***I'm sorry you disavow free will, but I understand it makes you feel better to have absolutely no responsibility.***

Free will is a myth! Your will is bound. Nevertheless, you Arminians are free to preach the freeness of MAN's will. I will preach the freeness of GOD's grace.
112 posted on 11/08/2002 7:23:40 AM PST by theAmbassador
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: theAmbassador
Free will is a myth!

Thank you for your honesty.

SD

113 posted on 11/08/2002 7:29:36 AM PST by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave; the_doc; drstevej; sheltonmac; CCWoody; RnMomof7; Jean Chauvin; ...
No problem. I have absolutely no hesitation with laying out exactly what it is that I do claim the Bible teaches.

Let me state it one more time for the record (you can quote me on this): There is no such thing as a free will.

A.W. Pink:

Concerning the nature and the power of fallen man's will, the greatest confusion prevails today, and the most erroneous views are held, even by many of God's children. The popular idea now prevailing, and which is taught from the great majority of pulpits, is that man has a "free will," and that salvation comes to the sinner through his will co-operating with the Holy Spirit. To deny the "free will" of man, i.e., his power to choose that which is good, his native ability to accept Christ, is to bring one into disfavor at once, even before most of those who profess to be orthodox. And yet Scripture emphatically says, "It is not of him that willeth, nor of him that runneth, but of God that showeth mercy" (Rom. 9:16). Which shall we believe: God, or the preachers?

That Roman Catholics and Arminians walk hand in hand may be seen from others of the decrees issued by the Council of Trent: "If any one shall affirm that a regenerate and justified man is bound to believe that he is certainly in the number of the elect (which 1 Thess. 1:4, 5 plainly teaches.--A.W.P.) let such an one be accursed"! "If any one shall affirm with positive and absolute certainty, that he shall surely have the gift of perseverance to the end (which John 10:28-30 assuredly guarantees, A. W. P.); let him be accursed"!


TRUE LIBERTY IS NOT THE POWER TO LIVE AS WE PLEASE, BUT TO LIVE AS WE OUGHT! HENCE, THE ONLY ONE WHO HAS EVER WALKED THIS EARTH SINCE ADAM'S FALL THAT HAS ENJOYED PERFECT FREEDOM WAS THE MAN CHRIST JESUS, THE HOLY SERVANT OF GOD, WHOSE MEAT IT EVER IS TO DO, NOT HIS WILL, BUT THE WILL OF THE FATHER.

Not my will, but Yours be done.
Amen.



And now, I must inform you that if you respond to this, one of my friends will have to carry the conversation as my project has arrived and I will most likely be unable to post for an undetermined time to come.

Corin, grace and peace to you and your family.

I will leave you all with this parting shot of eschatology:

For the earnest expectation of the creature waiteth for the manifestation of the sons of God. For the creature was made subject to vanity, not willingly, but by reason of him who hath subjected [the same] in hope, because the creature itself also shall be delivered from the bondage of corruption into the glorious ~LIBERTY~ of the children of God.

I do wonder just how one can say that the Millennium described by the Premillennialists in their various stripes will be the manifestation of the sons of God and the glorious ~LIBERTY~ of wills that are ~BOUND~ forever to perform the ~WILL~ of the Father ***when*** we all agree that this kingdom will be full of pretenders who only outwardly show a will bound to the Father when inwardly their meat is to walk after the god of this age.
114 posted on 11/08/2002 8:36:00 AM PST by theAmbassador
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: theAmbassador; SoothingDave
I don't know about you Dave, but this does it for me, where do I get my calvin badge and decoder ring? :)

BigMack

115 posted on 11/08/2002 8:43:49 AM PST by PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
I don't know about you Dave, but this does it for me, where do I get my calvin badge and decoder ring? :)

I think the fact that you now desire it, means that you already have it. If you weren't meant to have it, you would never want it. Isn't that right?

SD

116 posted on 11/08/2002 8:47:06 AM PST by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave
That's unbecoming of a divine being.

Thats what the men screamed when Noah floated off in the ark and they drown...and the same cry came for the men burning in Sodom...and I do believe cries of "this is NOT fair " were heard as the Egyptians drown

Behavior unbecoming a Sovereign God..He will take that opinion into consideration:>)

117 posted on 11/08/2002 8:47:37 AM PST by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
It scares you huh MACK? Thats ok...most of us have been there..
118 posted on 11/08/2002 8:51:12 AM PST by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave
I think the fact that you now desire it, means that you already have it. If you weren't meant to have it, you would never want it. Isn't that right?

The non elect do NOT want it..they do not think about it..they like living as they are..That is the point of regeneration.."A new heart I will give you"

119 posted on 11/08/2002 8:53:11 AM PST by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave
I think the fact that you now desire it, means that you already have it. If you weren't meant to have it, you would never want it. Isn't that right?

I do like cheesecake. :)

Besides Mom told me I'm in and God loves me, you on the other hand are screwed...LOL

BigMack

120 posted on 11/08/2002 8:56:47 AM PST by PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 221-226 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson