Posted on 07/18/2002 3:10:53 PM PDT by narses
Interesting idea, I never thought of it that way. One used to be able to go to a Roman Catholic Church anywhere in the world and experience the same (universal) Mass. IMHO, that has been a great loss.
"Once they are regularized, the opening for the Tridentine, no matter how regulated, will create a firestorm amongst the liberals."
It doesn't matter. The liberals are not superhuman. They can't do what cannot be done. Should our Holy Father dramatically liberalize the rules governing the Tridentine Rite, the liberals cannot use that at this time to go into open schism. If they do, they will be walking out onto the tenderest parts of the limb, and using a band saw to cut it off. Should they go into open schism at this time, mark my words, they will vanish without a trace, and only academics will remember them 50 years hence.
I would still appreciate comments about the latter part of my post, discussing the difficulties inherent in liberalization of the use of the old Mass. Do you see that there is an inherent tension between granting to each individual priest the right to celebrate the old Mass, and the need for discipline and order at the parish and diocesan level? How does one resolve that tension? How open is SSPX to a resolution that might stop short of an absolute right of an individual priest to celebrate the old Mass? Not rhetorical questions. They are really fuzzy in my own mind.
sitetest
After these events, in noting your good will and based on the fact that your Fraternity certainly was not spreading any heretical doctrine and did not maintain schismatic attitudes, I had dared you to propose, without consulting anyone first, to set a possible date for reintegration.That isnt a fair quotation when you neglect the tons of stuff that was said after that.
I cannot fail to note with sadness that this tone, concerning the intentions of the Holy See, does not help toward reconciliation, since it is not in line with the superior gift of charity, as St. Irenaeus taught: "He shall also judge those who give rise to schisms, who are destitute of the love of God, and who look to their own special advantage rather than to the unity of the Church; and who for trifling reasons, or any kind of reason which occurs to them, cut in pieces and divide the great and glorious body of Christ, and so far as in them lies, [positively] destroy it,--men who prate of peace while they give rise to war, and do in truth strain out a gnat, but swallow a camel. For no reformation of so great importance can be effected by them, as will compensate for the mischief arising from their schism. ... True knowledge is [that which consists in] the doctrine of the apostles, and the ancient constitution of the Church throughout all the world, and the distinctive manifestation of the body of Christ according to the successions of the bishops, by which they have handed down that Church which exists in every place, and has come even unto us, being guarded and preserved without any forging of Scriptures, by a very complete system of doctrine, and neither receiving addition nor [suffering] curtailment [in the truths which she believes]; and [it consists in] reading [the word of God] without falsification, and a lawful and diligent exposition in harmony with the Scriptures, both without danger and without blasphemy; and [above all, it consists in] the pre-eminent gift of love, which is more precious than knowledge, more glorious than prophecy, and which excels all the other gifts [of God]."These are hard words, coming from a Roman diplomat, but they are deserved given how, when the Vatican most generously offered an apostolic administration, the Society reacted in such a bitter, angry, and distrustful manner.St. Thomas writes on what follows the suffering that schism causes, in commenting on a passage of St. Paul: "Et, similiter in ecclesia, imperfectionibus sunt magis consolationes adhibendae, quibus perfectiones non egent. Unde dicitur Is. 11, 11: in brachio suo congregabit agnos, et in sinu suo levabit, foetas ipse portabit, et, 1 Petr. III, 7 dicitur: viri quasi infirmiori vasculo muliebri impartientes honorem. est notandum quod triplicem defectum circa membra notavit, scilicet inhonestatis, ignobilitatis et infirmitatis. Quorum primum in membris ecclesiae pertinet ad culpam; secundum ad conditionem servilem; tertium ad statum imperfectionis. secundo ponit causam finalem, dicens ut non sit schisma in corpore. Quod quidem sequeretur, si defectui membrorum non subveniretur. Hoc autem schisma quantum ad membra corporis mystici manifeste vitatur, dum pax ecclesiae custoditur per hoc, quod singulis ea quae sunt necessaria attribuuntur. Unde et supra dictum est cap. I, v. 10: idipsum dicatis omnes, et non sint in vobis schismata."
Excellency, my sincere frankness regarding the beginning and course of our history is not intended in the least to vex or embarrass you. I consider total sincerity in relations a necessary condition of a true agreement and success of our project.
Excellency, I beg you to consider me truly as a brother who loves you and who desires the good of the Church, its clear unity, witnessed by the unity of Christ with the Father and the Holy Spirit, in the face of the world. You know that I have never wanted to promote the division of the Society of St. Pius X and its bishops, even if today I am convinced that there are those in your ranks who no longer have the true faith in the authentic Tradition of the Church; those who, without a conversion caused by the Holy Spirit, will return with difficulty to unity, it seems to me.
What has urged me on from the beginning, and causes me to write to you today, is the charity of Christ which compels me not to neglect a single attempt to make unity, a true mark of charity, triumph. Today, more than yesterday, I suffer and carry the weight of knowing you are in a situation of excommunication, whereas all the faithful of Campos have henceforth happily passed from this situation, under the leadership of their pastor.
Frankly the highest court in the Catholic Church has found that attending Mass at a SSPX Chapel is valid and not an occassion for discipline (the Hawaii case).Your not being at all precise here either. The Church found that the Bishop of Hawaii did not have valid grounds for excommunicating the four individuals. The Church has also found that the Masses offered by the SSPX are generally valid, but that they are illicit and that the faithful may not attend them unless no valid Mass in communion with Rome is available.
Rome has offered to remove the excommunication and give full faculties to all of the priests and bishops of the SSPX in an Apostolic Administration that would open the potential for a world wide Tridentine Rite availability.Which they rejected. Shows how schismatic they are.
Dominus Vobiscum
patent +AMDG
The Pope doesn't want to be the Pope. He has done nothing in the last 25 years to preserve the faith.He has done far more than you have. Your version of reality is sadly lacking.
Most Catholics are tranquilly happy with the Novus Ordo because they are brain dead.A yes, everyone who disagrees with you is stupid. Great rhetorical device.
I woke up and asked myself: "Is all this nonsense pleasing to God?" The answer was No.Are you calling the Mass nonsense? The Sacrifice of the Mass, in a liturgy approved by the Church, the Novus Ordo? I think Trent had something clear to say about that. What is the word, anathema? Perhaps I am brain dead and just cant recall it right now.
patent +AMDG
Pope John Paul II has agreed that the Tridentine Mass was never abrogated.My understanding is that it is abrogated as the normative Roman Rite, but that it remains a valid Mass where said in accordance with proper jurisdiction. Is that your understanding?
Dominus Vobiscum
patent +AMDG
Presuming a couple things, you and I couldn't go say it and claim its valid, for an extreme example.
patent
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.