Posted on 07/18/2002 3:10:53 PM PDT by narses
LOL. I like how you (re-)interpreted that.
Nonetheless, the older I get, the more I appreciate the desire of our Holy Father to avoid formal schism.
sitetest
I'm sure it does in your world. But the numbers simply don't bear out the "lot of interest" that many of the (to paraphrase your words) "overly optimistic" here on FR keep insisting is out there.
In addition, there's a lot of difference between the Novus Ordo in Latin and the Tridentine Mass. The Novus Ordo is normative; even the Pope is not in favor of allowing the Tridentine Mass to supplant the Novus Ordo. That's why I can't, for the life of me, figure out where all these SSSP priests are going to find work. Bishops are simply not going to establish more than one or two "Latin only" parishes in a diocese.
They won't. Go up and read Williamson's second later, dated June 1 of this year.
Williamson will simply take those who will never reconcile, call his gaggle the SSPX, and continue on.
Fellay may reintegrate, but, judging from the bullheadedness of the SSPXer's on this site, he might be the only one who does.
That's why I can't, for the life of me, figure out where all these SSSP priests are going to find work. Bishops are simply not going to establish more than one or two "Latin only" parishes in a diocese.LOL. Just how many SSPX priests do you think there are? Take the existing one Latin only parish in the diocese (some of them, anyway), add a second for an SSPX priest, and you are going to have to find a whole lot more SSPX priests to fill all the spots. Anyway, whatever happens, finding work for priests will probably be the smallest problem.
patent +AMDG
Even Bruskewitz's Lincoln diocese has only one Latin Mass parish. I don't know of any Latin Mass parishes in all of Texas, except for those of the Anglican-use.
I've always felt that the best thing for the SSPX is to give it it's own rite, but people like Fellay don't want that. They want to be mainstream, and that will never happen.
Then you've got the Williamson's, who won't reconcile under any circumstances.
Where did you answer the questions he asked you in reply #61?
Patent, I was referring to the Fraternity of St. Peter priests (I used the wrong abbreviation), who are being trained in the Tridentine liturgy with the blessing of Rome.Heck, theyre even smaller.
Then you've got the Williamson's, who won't reconcile under any circumstances.Yep. There is always a Remnant that will resist Rome.
patent +AMDG
Careful! He may call you a rascal too.
The last refuge of a traditionalist rascal is to pretend to psychoanalyse the holder of a position.
I'd say he's wound up pretty tight for a Kumbaya Katholic. ;-)
That would be the "bells and smells" refernce in one of your earilier posts?
Lex orandi, lex credendi
How do you explain a lack of belief in the Real Presence by a majority of Catholics today?(I'm sure you won't think the lack of reverence in the Mass, the hiding of the tabernacle, etc. has anything to do with it.)
Yes, by all means, let's have "liturgical flexibility" Bring on the guitars and the dancing girls.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.