Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: drstevej
But do you see a theological difference between the two scenarios? Am I making any sense?

SD

49,092 posted on 04/28/2003 11:51:34 AM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49088 | View Replies ]


To: SoothingDave; Invincibly Ignorant; OLD REGGIE; CindyDawg; Havoc; ksen; angelo; biblewonk
Am I making any sense?

Ok guys here's your chance for a GRAND SLAM! A slow one right down the middle. :)

BigMack

49,097 posted on 04/28/2003 11:56:27 AM PDT by PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49092 | View Replies ]

To: SoothingDave; biblewonk
You might want to check out Menno Simons (16th century Anabaptist) who held to the doctrine of the celestial flesh of Christ [i.e. Jesus brought his flesh from heaven and was born in but not of Mary].

http://ontruth.com/menno.html

Menno did not originate the doctrine but he did defend it in writing. Another holding similar views included Melchior Hoffman. I know of no 16th or 17th century Protestant that embraced his view. Many condemned it.

I have a copy of Menno's Complette Writings but have not read his treatise on Celestial Flesh in many years.

Menno would however argue that this issue has theological implications. A google search might provide research materials for you or biblewonk

49,111 posted on 04/28/2003 12:16:56 PM PDT by drstevej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49092 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson