Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: SoothingDave
As I said, I think the language of Luke 1:31 supports Mary as one who conceived rather than one who was a recepticle. I do believe that her conception is connected to Jesus' humanity.

What I don't know is the genetic details of the Holy Spirit's overshadowing of her. Hey, it was a miracle!

As to Mary's role. I don't desire to diminish her nor to overly exalt her. Honestly, I think Protestants are sometimes guilty of the former and than most Catholics (and Catholic theology for sure) are guilty of the later.
49,088 posted on 04/28/2003 11:49:38 AM PDT by drstevej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49069 | View Replies ]


To: drstevej
But do you see a theological difference between the two scenarios? Am I making any sense?

SD

49,092 posted on 04/28/2003 11:51:34 AM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49088 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson