Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain; SoothingDave; Invincibly Ignorant; biblewonk; CindyDawg; All
Got an e-mail from a lurker who makes a great point about the belief in the sinless nature of Mary. Consider the following:

And if she cannot afford a lamb, then she shall take two turtledoves or two young pigeons, one for a burnt offering and the other for a sin offering; and the priest shall make atonement for her, and she shall be clean." (Leviticus 12:8)

And when the time came for their purification according to the law of Moses, they brought him up to Jerusalem to present him to the Lord
(as it is written in the law of the Lord, "Every male that opens the womb shall be called holy to the Lord")
and to offer a sacrifice according to what is said in the law of the Lord, "a pair of turtledoves, or two young pigeons." (Luke 2:22-24)

Note from the verse from Leviticus that one of the doves is a "sin offering", and that it is "for her". Whatever else one might say about Mary, the gospel does record that she did present a sin offering for herself.

47,693 posted on 04/21/2003 10:02:19 AM PDT by malakhi (fundamentalist unitarian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47689 | View Replies ]


To: malakhi
Note from the verse from Leviticus that one of the doves is a "sin offering", and that it is "for her". Whatever else one might say about Mary, the gospel does record that she did present a sin offering for herself.

This is a very good catch but I fear that the Marian will simply point to the Baptism of Jesus as an example of someone not needing a baptism but getting it for a different reason. John's (that guy who is the greatest of men born of women) baptism was one of repentance which the Lord certainly didn't need.

47,699 posted on 04/21/2003 10:13:39 AM PDT by biblewonk (Spose to be a Chrissssstian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47693 | View Replies ]

To: malakhi; SoothingDave; Invincibly Ignorant; biblewonk; CindyDawg; All
Note from the verse from Leviticus that one of the doves is a "sin offering", and that it is "for her". Whatever else one might say about Mary, the gospel does record that she did present a sin offering for herself.

Nice try. :)

You remember that when the Lord Jesus was born, his mother brought turtle-doves because the poor could bring them as an offering. She had to have an offering because she was a sinner; she was not sinless. She brought an offering. But there was no offering for the Lord Jesus. No offering was ever made for Jesus or by Jesus. He is the sinless One. He was the offering for the sin of the world. He is the Lamb of God.

Luke:2 [21] And when eight days were fulfilled for circumcising him, his name was called JESUS, which was so called by the angel before he was conceived in the womb.

[22] And when the days of their purification according to the law of Moses were fulfilled, they brought him up to Jerusalem, to present him to the Lord

[23] (as it is written in the law of the Lord, Every male that openeth the womb shall be called holy to the Lord),

[24] and to offer a sacrifice according to that which is said in the law of the Lord, A pair of turtledoves, or two young pigeons.

[25] And behold, there was a man in Jerusalem, whose name was Simeon; and this man was righteous and devout, looking for the consolation of Israel: and the Holy Spirit was upon him.

[26] And it had been revealed unto him by the Holy Spirit, that he should not see death, before he had seen the Lord’s Christ.

[27] And he came in the Spirit into the temple: and when the parents brought in the child Jesus, that they might do concerning him after the custom of the law,

BigMack

47,703 posted on 04/21/2003 10:22:56 AM PDT by PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47693 | View Replies ]

To: malakhi
Got an e-mail from a lurker who makes a great point about the belief in the sinless nature of Mary.

IF the lurker wants an answer, let him post it himself!

(Oh, that's right, you're the pugnacious one.)

Note from the verse from Leviticus that one of the doves is a "sin offering", and that it is "for her". Whatever else one might say about Mary, the gospel does record that she did present a sin offering for herself.

The answer is simply that Mary followed the Law, as any person obedient to God did.

Is it this "lurkers" position (or yours) that childbirth is a sin which requires atonement? OR is it simply a ritual cleansing?

SD

47,707 posted on 04/21/2003 10:28:56 AM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47693 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson