Posted on 03/30/2002 7:53:37 PM PST by malakhi
Statesmen may plan and speculate for liberty, but it is religion and morality alone which can establish the principles upon which freedom can securely stand. The only foundation of a free constitution is pure virtue. - John Adams |
I disagree. God is Just.
And merciful.
SD
Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that heareth my word, and believeth on him that sent me, hath everlasting life, and shall not come into condemnation; but is passed from death unto life. (John 5:24)
Looks to me that I am already saved.
the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon himself, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon himself.
I don't see how you can get around the plain meaning of this passage.
This is the justice (i.e. Old Testament) position. This does not take the grace of JESUS' sacrifice into account.
I never said it was.
But what of charity? What is charity other than us giving up our earned time or money to pay the debts of another? Is that "unjust?"
No.
Because it is voluntary. God would never randomly select someone and make him suffer for others. But He would come down and, as man, volunteer for the job.
SD
If you persevere. Let's not forget that. If you persevere it will be proof of Christ working through you.
SD
Good point. There is precedence for this Almighty form of "fuzzy math."
(Take the traditional view of the Twelve selected from Israel, and Paul selected from the Gentiles as instructive as well.)
SD
Make that "for" the Gentiles. Don't want Reggie to have a heart attack.
SD
Whose word do you have to heareth? :') Dave, we need some help here. I know what's coming so why don't you please define heareth for us. lol
I disagree. Even if the innocent is willing, it is unjust to punish the innocent for the crimes of the guilty. That, in my opinion, is the significance of the verse in question. Let me ask you -- how do you reconcile Ezekiel 18:20 with your beliefs about the sacrificial death of Jesus?
Thanks Reg! Now if we could just get Mack and Becky to agree, we could all join together in a rousing rendition of Kumbayah.
On second thought, maybe its better that we continue to disagree... ;o)
"Heareth" is the opposite of "overthereth." :-)
(Both hearing and believing, in this case mean more than an intellectual assent, and a full flowering into action. It's not a one-time deal, it's a journey.)
SD
BELIEVING! straight from your buddy. lol
You have reached the entry point of this conversation again. Is charity unjust? In charity someone sacrifices himself and his property in order to help the unfortunate out of whatever predicament they may be in.
Is this unjust, this suffering for another? Should we instead let the poor suffer, cause taking on their "punishment" is wrong?
SD
Hey, on your little smiley guy, is he sticking his tongue out, or is that his nose? :')
Since I do consider Jesus a prophet, I don't have a problem with that referring to his teachings. What he taught was grounded in Judaism anyway.
Unfortunately, I don't think we have Jesus's teachings as he himself gave them. Rather, we have them filtered through the lens of Pauline theology.
That's the best argument I've seen so far.
Still, I prefer the image of sacrifice as a symbol of reconciliation with God to one of placating an angry God.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.