Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Neverending Story (The Christian Chronicles)
Associated Press ^ | 3/24/01

Posted on 03/30/2002 7:53:37 PM PST by malakhi

The Neverending Story
An ongoing debate on Scripture, Tradition, History and Interpretation.


Statesmen may plan and speculate for liberty, but it is religion and morality alone which can establish the principles upon which freedom can securely stand. The only foundation of a free constitution is pure virtue. - John Adams

Previous Thread


TOPICS: General Discusssion
KEYWORDS: catholiclist; michaeldobbs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 51,301-51,32051,321-51,34051,341-51,360 ... 65,521-65,537 next last
To: newgeezer
OK. By extropolating that change back to the time of the birth of Christ, the view of marriage as something other than a cheap way to get laid is put into its historical context.

Have a good weekend, by the way.

51,321 posted on 05/02/2003 2:54:48 PM PDT by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51319 | View Replies]

To: newgeezer
I find--found-- the same tone in the KJV, which is not based on any Latin translation.
51,322 posted on 05/02/2003 3:02:18 PM PDT by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51211 | View Replies]

To: Quester
The devil knows that his will is opposed to God. So to him disorder is order, and evil is good.
51,323 posted on 05/02/2003 3:12:03 PM PDT by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51209 | View Replies]

To: malakhi
No one says that we are incapable of free choice, but the old saying goes: the spirit is willing but the flesh is weak.
51,324 posted on 05/02/2003 3:15:13 PM PDT by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51203 | View Replies]

To: newgeezer
A bike can be ridden as safely as a car. One just must bear in mind that the bike cannot be driven safely in certain places. I would never drive one on I-35 through Dallas. for instance, even in good weather. I would never drive one on wet roads in heavy traffic.
51,325 posted on 05/02/2003 3:18:55 PM PDT by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51215 | View Replies]

To: al_c
2001 xl1200c Sportster. New, no miles. Blue and silver. Nice; but, it didn't work out. Looks like I'll be waiting till my lawyer gets done with 'em.
51,326 posted on 05/02/2003 4:25:03 PM PDT by Havoc (If you can't be frank all the time are you lying the rest of the time?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51174 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave
You do believe pagan fairy tales. You think I worship an non-existent goddess, for example.

I don't believe its a fairy tail, hence; ridicule.

This is a fact. You are transparent.

This is a fact. If you think I'm transparent you are a moron.

The question is still unanswered how someone who was aware of her Immaculate Conception would logically know that she was to give birth without a father.

The question is still unanswered how if both Joseph and Mary knew before they were married that Mary would be a virgin her whole life, why would Joseph doubt what was in her was conceived of the Holy Spirit. After all. Mary had to know she was immaculatly conceived and would have shared it with her fiance. Wasn't Mary's incredible goodness on display during their courtship. There would be no reason for Joseph to doubt. I give you that in a normal situation he would have had doubt but as you've pointed out to me on many occasions, this is not a normal situation. Can't have it both ways.

As is how Joseph's reaction to this betrays his intention to have sex with Mary as soon as possible.

Never said he wanted to have it right away. Quit lying.

51,327 posted on 05/02/2003 4:37:58 PM PDT by Invincibly Ignorant (Hows my posting? Call 1-800-Matthew 1:24 & 25.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51296 | View Replies]

To: Invincibly Ignorant
Relax, it oughta be liberating for all of us. :-)

BigMack

51,328 posted on 05/02/2003 6:20:01 PM PDT by PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51258 | View Replies]

To: Invincibly Ignorant
If Joseph was an old man and Mary was a very young heiress, then that would make a significant difference in their relationship, right? But, really, I find the speculation useless. Focus on the holiness of both Mary and Joseph. This is what stikes me as I read the birth naratives. Did Mary know about her immaculate conception? Did Jesus know he was God?
51,329 posted on 05/02/2003 7:46:27 PM PDT by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51327 | View Replies]

To: All; PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain

The Man of Virtues Has a Vice

Conservative activist Bill Bennett has wagered millions in Las Vegas and Atlantic City casinos during the past decade

The full story on the Drudge Report.

Can you believe this? It looks like we're still looking for a few good men, huh

Is gambling wrong in and of its self? If you make 5 million a year and loose 1 million at the casino every year, is that a sin?

What is wrong about gambling?

JH $$$$$$

51,330 posted on 05/02/2003 8:02:09 PM PDT by JHavard (Aren't we gambling our eternal life on the choice of belief we have?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51328 | View Replies]

To: JHavard
As Rosanne Rosannadanna used to say ...
It's always something ...

If it's not one thing, it's another ...

51,331 posted on 05/02/2003 8:38:02 PM PDT by Quester
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51330 | View Replies]

To: JHavard
***If you make 5 million a year and loose 1 million at the casino every year, is that a sin?***

Are you interested in some Enron stock, CHEAP ???
51,332 posted on 05/02/2003 8:45:08 PM PDT by drstevej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51330 | View Replies]

To: Quester

 "It just goes to show you,

It's always something."

51,333 posted on 05/02/2003 8:49:07 PM PDT by drstevej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51331 | View Replies]

To: Quester
It's always something ...

If it's not one thing, it's another ...

Heavy mannnn!

JH :-)

51,334 posted on 05/02/2003 8:50:34 PM PDT by JHavard (Aren't we gambling our eternal life on the choice of belief we have?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51331 | View Replies]

To: JHavard
Is gambling wrong in and of its self?

That's between him and the Lord but, sadly, he is guilty of not abstaining from the appearance of evil.

51,335 posted on 05/02/2003 9:10:58 PM PDT by Invincibly Ignorant (Hows my posting? Call 1-800-Matthew 1:24 & 25.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51330 | View Replies]

To: al_c
Well the border just kind of blends here. A lot of people were born in Mexico or have family there so I guess they have the pride of both countries. Charro Days are very popular here too. What really irks me though is to see the Mexican flag flying right beside the US and Texas ones. We have several chain banks that are doing this.
51,336 posted on 05/02/2003 10:11:46 PM PDT by CindyDawg (j)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51256 | View Replies]

To: JHavard
Is gambling wrong in and of its self? If you make 5 million a year and loose 1 million at the casino every year, is that a sin?
What is wrong about gambling?

I think there's no question that gambling for money is a sin. It's really just a way to indulge in the sins of lust and greed.

We have quite a few Indian casinos around here and I used to enjoy going to them. I never really lost a huge amount of money and always limited my losses, but the last time I went was a couple of months before I was baptized. I could see the evil that permeates there. Old people with oxygen tanks dragging them in so they could gamble. Drunks, smokers, etc. It was so...sad and pathetic.

This sin has become normalized in our society now. Satan has been effective in making these things mainstream. Las Vegas was "sin city". Now every state just about wants their own sin city.

As far as Bill Bennett goes he deserves what he gets. If he wants to present himself as a virtuous man, then he sure as heck better lead a virtuous life or he's no better than a pharisee. He needs to recognize that his behavior is a sin and repent of it.

51,337 posted on 05/03/2003 8:14:10 AM PDT by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51330 | View Replies]

To: DouglasKC
***I think there's no question that gambling for money is a sin. It's really just a way to indulge in the sins of lust and greed.***

Ever owned any stock?

Compulsive risk taking is a sin (lack of self control), but is all risk taking (financially) a sin?

This week I refinanced our home. I locked in at 4.75% (15 YR fixed). I am gambling that the rates will not go lower.

51,338 posted on 05/03/2003 8:33:04 AM PDT by drstevej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51337 | View Replies]

To: drstevej
Ever owned any stock?
Compulsive risk taking is a sin (lack of self control), but is all risk taking (financially) a sin?
This week I refinanced our home. I locked in at 4.75% (15 YR fixed). I am gambling that the rates will not go lower.

Good questions. I was talking about smaller context as it pertains to what we traditionally think of as gambling for money.

I think that there are many things "wrong" with the way our society operates but are tolerated by God because he realizes we live in secular societies that are not physically ruled by him today. For example charging interest on loans is clearly against biblical principles and won't be part of God's future kingdom on earth. In the same way financial transactions (and possibly money itself) that involve risk taking are not neccassarily "right" but are tolerated. In a world physically governed by Christ there will be no need to take any kind of finanicial risk...it's an example of man doing his own thing.

In the case of casino and organized gambling though it's an entirely different story. You have an entire industry built upon greed and lust...the lure of getting something for nothing. Acquiring wealth for the sole purpose of acquiring wealth. I see a difference.

You seem to be making the case that unless a sin is out of control it's not a sin. For example, if I shoplift something once from a store it's not a sin, but if I do it habitually it is?

51,339 posted on 05/03/2003 9:28:36 AM PDT by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51338 | View Replies]

To: DouglasKC
Taking financial risk is not inherently sinful (in distinction to shoplifting which is theft). Habitual shoplifting is a combination of the sin of theft with the sin of lack of self control.

Eating is not sin, gluttony is. Financial risk motivated by greed or lack of self control is sinful. Financial risk when there are no other sinful issues involved is not sin.

Your posts raises questions:

[1] Have you ever owned stock? If financial risk is sinful, owning stock (or any other asset that potentially increases or decreases) is sin.

[2] Have you ever had a mortgage? If interest is sinful having a mortgage would be supporting sin. Why settle, as a Christian, for something you believe God merely "tolerates?"
51,340 posted on 05/03/2003 9:44:07 AM PDT by drstevej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51339 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 51,301-51,32051,321-51,34051,341-51,360 ... 65,521-65,537 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson