Posted on 07/09/2026 8:41:57 AM PDT by Red Badger

A Fort Worth police officer telling retired police officer and Christian street preacher that he could receive a citation if someone was “offended” by his speech during a Pride event (Screenshot: Sarah Fields/X) The radical left’s war on Christianity and the First Amendment has officially reached a terrifying new flashpoint in the Lone Star State.
The encounter, which was first reported by investigative reporter Sarah Fields, has sparked renewed debate over the First Amendment and whether law enforcement can lawfully punish constitutionally protected speech simply because another person finds it offensive
According to a video from the June 27 Trinity Pride Fest in downtown Fort Worth, Christian street preachers David Grisham, a retired police officer, and Richard Penkoski were preaching on public property when they were approached by officers.
Police had set up barricades restricting access to public streets and sidewalks around the event. Officers moved the preachers farther away and issued warnings.
The female officer told the group, “If someone is offended by your talking, then we have a problem,” and added, “If they are offended by your speech, OK, I will write you a ticket.”
When challenged further, she added that the citation would be for disorderly conduct. The preachers repeatedly argued that offensive speech is protected by the First Amendment and cannot be criminalized merely because someone claims to be offended.
Sarah Field reported on X:
“Street preachers Richard Penkoski and David Grisham were subjected to multiple violations of their First Amendment rights while attempting to preach on public property.
Upon arrival, they were immediately met by Fort Worth police officers who blocked their access to the public street and sidewalk, threatening both men with arrest for trespassing if they entered the area. When Grisham reminded officers that he had previously sued the City of Fort Worth in 2014 over this exact issue – a lawsuit that resulted in a settlement and an official apology from the city – the officer dismissed the prior case, stating, “I don’t care, you can file whatever lawsuit you want.”
After being forced outside the barricades, the confrontation escalated as multiple officers allegedly threatened to cite the men based on the subjective reactions of attendees. A female officer stated they would be cited if they said anything “offensive.” When Penkoski responded that offensive speech is protected under the Constitution and is not a crime, the officer claimed it fell under disorderly conduct, stating, “Well, yes, that is the conduct.”
Another officer further confirmed that citations would be based solely on whether others were offended. When Penkoski asked whether calling a biological male a “male” would result in a citation if someone took offense, the officer responded that if he continued doing so and someone found it offensive, he would be cited. Penkoski also pointed out that he was deeply offended by half-naked men walking around children at the event, but the officer dismissed the complaint, responding, “There’s really not much I can do about that.”
During the encounter, Penkoski pulled up and directly showed an officer established U.S. Supreme Court precedent confirming that the government cannot prohibit citizens from accessing traditional public forums such as streets and sidewalks simply because a private group holds a permit. Although the officer acknowledged the information by responding, “Huh,” he continued enforcing the restriction. (This video will be in the thread)
As officers repeatedly pushed the preachers farther away from the event, David Grisham was ultimately issued a citation for “unreasonable noise.” When asked to explain what constituted unreasonable noise under the circumstances, officers were unable to provide a clear definition, vaguely suggesting it could involve “sticking a megaphone in someone’s ear” – which Penkoski states did not occur, as the megaphone was held at waist level – or simply offending people.
When the officers were asked how they justified suppressing the constitutional rights of Christians and veterans who fought for the country, they offered no meaningful objective explanation. As a veteran who was willing to die defending American liberties, Penkoski said he found it deeply alarming that a Christian preacher in modern America could be threatened with arrest and cited while standing on public property simply because his message offended those listening.”
WATCH:
Fort Worth PD later admitted the officer’s statements were “not accurate,” ordered First Amendment refresher training for officers, and confirmed that public sidewalks remain open for speech.
Christian Post reported:
A Fort Worth PD spokesman on Monday provided The Christian Post with the following statement: “The Fort Worth Police Department is committed to protecting the constitutional rights of all individuals, including the right to free speech and peaceful assembly, while also ensuring public safety and enforcing applicable laws and ordinances.
“We are aware of a video and allegations circulating [on] social media. We will need some time to look into this and will provide additional information once our review is complete.”
While Fort Worth PD did not publicly identify the female officer in the video, she appeared to be the same officer who prevented another Christian evangelist group from entering the Trinity Pride Fest in 2025. Video footage shared on YouTube last June shows a female officer with a similar voice and facial features telling members of the evangelist group Unprofitable Servants Ministries trying to enter the public event that “they don’t want you here.”
Penkoski, who runs the online organization Warriors for Christ and protests drag shows nationwide, told CP he was shocked when police threatened to ticket them for their speech.
“The female officer told us flat out that we would get a citation if we said anything offensive, so I wanted to clarify with another officer if that really was their position,” he said. “I was completely surprised when he said that there’s a possibility that I could be cited for calling [someone] a biological male …”
“As a veteran who was willing to die for his country, I never in a million years thought that this is the America we’d be living in right now,” he added.
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
Did she speak with a British accent??!?
“It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies and nosers-out of unorthodoxy.”
― George Orwell, 1984
Democrats are not real big on free speech.
They misspelled “female dog”...
I hope she does, seriously, the lawsuit to follow will be epic and costly for her and the Fort Worth!
Stupid fat lesbian. Chicks should not be allowed to be cops.
A female officer. Of course.
If only women had the capacity to think in a logical manner, they're realize that if you go down this road, no one would ever be able to say anything - except them, of course (cops exempt from everything).
>> seriously, the lawsuit to follow will be epic and costly for her and the Fort Worth!
Not to mention the solid gold epic MEMES that are gonna come out of this encounter! She’ll be infamous!
My guess is she resigns from the police force within a month — if they don’t fire her outright, that is. What a maroon!
I wish that someone would slap The STUPID out of that B!TCH.
Yes, little missy WE will have a problem JUST BEFORE I sue your fat ass and department into oblivion.
I hope the incident was recorded with sound.
B!TCH made a threat, Case Closed.
It would not surprise me at all....................
Obviously she has been directed by her political masters to violate the Constitution and the rights of these Christians. Hopefully what she said is on tape.She is probably gay herself and is intoxicated with the uniform and her gun. Hopefully Fort Worth is again sued. Also while she is under oath during her deposition , she should be pressed to identify who gave her orders to harass and violate rights.
That woman needs her badge and gun taken away; like right now. Send her to DMV to file papers.
” It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies and nosers-out of unorthodoxy.”
— George Orwell
Deprivation Of Rights Under Color Of Law
Make sure this bit is in bold...
... Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, ... shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both;...
This kind of overreach by any cops needs to be aggressively followed up with firings, court cases, jail time and huge fines for all involved . We can’t allow ANY of this to take root and flourish like in the UK.
Maybe one of them burly Texas gals should thump the crap out of her. It would be a good for America...!
Please get a big settlement from Ft. Worth.
Ping of interest to you, sir.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.