Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bible Only is dumb
Eponymous Flower ^ | September 9, 2023 | Stop Voris

Posted on 09/11/2023 9:23:22 AM PDT by ebb tide

Bible Only is dumb

ANSWERS TO 25 QUESTIONS ON THE
HISTORY OF THE NEW TESTAMENT
WHICH COMPLETELY REFUTE THE "BIBLE ONLY" THEORY

ONE
Did Our Lord write any part of the New Testament or command His Apostles to do so? Our Lord Himself never wrote a line, nor is there any record that He ordered his Apostles to write; He did command them to teach and to preach. Also He to Whom all power was given in Heaven and on earth (Matt. 28-18) promised to give them the Holy Spirit (John 14-26) and to be with them Himself till the end of the world (Mat. 28-20).
.
COMMENT: If reading the Bible were a necessary means of salvation, Our Lord would have made that statement and also provided the necessary means for his followers.
.
TWO
How many of the Apostles or others actually wrote what is now in the New Testament? A Few of the Apostles wrote part of Our Lord's teachings, as they themselves expressly stated; i.e., Peter, Paul, James, John, Jude, Matthew, also Sts. Mark and Luke. None of the others wrote anything, so far as is recorded.
.
COMMENT: If the Bible privately interpreted was to be a Divine rule of Faith, the apostles would have been derelict in their duty when instead, some of them adopted preaching only.
.
THREE
Was it a teaching or a Bible-reading Church that Christ founded? The Protestant Bible expressly states that Christ founded a teaching Church, which existed before any of the New Testament books were written.
.
Rom. 10-17: So then faith cometh by HEARING, and hearing by the word of God.
Matt. 28-19: Go ye therefore and TEACH all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost.
Mark. 16-20: And they went forth, and PREACHED everywhere the Lord working with them, and confirming the word with signs following. Amen.
Mark 16-15: And he said unto them, Go ye into all the world and PREACH the gospel to every creature.
COMMENT: Thus falls the entire basis of the "Bible-only" theory.
.
FOUR
Was there any drastic difference between what Our Lord commanded the Apostles to teach and what the New Testament contains? Our Lord commanded his Apostles to teach all things whatsoever He had commanded; (Matt. 28-20); His Church must necessarily teach everything; (John 14-26); however, the Protestant Bible itself teaches that the Bible does not contain all of Our Lord's doctrines:
.
John 20-30: And many other signs truly did Jesus in the presence of his disciples, which are not written in this book, etc.
John 21-25: And there are also many other things which Jesus did, the which, if they should be written every one, I suppose that even the world itself could not contain the books that should be written. Amen.
COMMENT: How would it have been possible for second century Christians to practice Our Lord's religion, if private interpretation of an unavailable and only partial account of Christ's teaching were indispensable?
.
FIVE
Does the New Testament expressly refer to Christ's "unwritten word"? The New Testament itself teaches that it does not contain all that Our Lord did or, consequently, all that He taught.
.
John 20-30: And many other signs truly did Jesus in the presence of his disciples, which are not written in this book, etc.
John 21-25: And there are also many other things which Jesus did, the which, if they should be written everyone, I suppose that even the world itself could not contain the books that should be written Amen.
COMMENT: Since the Bible is incomplete, it needs something else to supplement it; i.e., the spoken or historically recorded word which we call Tradition.
.
SIX
What became of the unwritten truths which Our Lord and the Apostles taught? The Church has carefully conserved this "word of mouth" teaching by historical records called Tradition. Even the Protestant Bible teaches that many Christian truths were to be handed down by word of mouth.
.
2 Thes. 2-15: Therefore, brethren, stand fast, and hold the traditions which ye have been taught, whether by word, or our epistle.
2 Tim. 2-2: And the things that thou hast heard of me among many witnesses, the same commit thou to faithful men, who shall be able to teach others also.
COMMENT: Hence not only Scripture but other sources of information must be consulted to get the whole of Christ's teaching. Religions founded on "the Bible only" are therefore necessarily incomplete.
.
SEVEN
Between what years were the first and last books of the New Testament written? This first book, St. Matthew's Gospel, was not written until about ten years after Our Lord's Ascension. St. John's fourth gospel and Apocalypse or Book of Revelations were not written until about 100 A. D.
.
COMMENT: Imagine how the present-day privately interpreted "Bible-only" theory would have appeared at a time when the books of the New Testament were not only unavailable, but most of them had not yet been written.
.
EIGHT
When was the New Testament placed under one cover? In 397 A. D. by the Council of Carthage, from which it follows that non-Catholics have derived their New Testament from the Catholic Church; no other source was available.
.
COMMENT: Up to 397 A. D., some of the Christians had access to part of the New Testament; into this situation, how would the "Bible-only privately interpreted" theory have fitted?
.
NINE
Why so much delay in compiling the New Testament? Prior to 397 A. D., the various books of the New Testament were not under one cover, but were in the custody of different groups or congregations. The persecutions against the Church, which had gained new intensity, prevented these New Testament books from being properly authenticated and placed under one cover. However, this important work was begun after Constantine gave peace to Christianity in 313 A.D., allowing it to be practiced in the Roman Empire.
.
COMMENT: This again shows how utterly impossible was the "Bible-only" theory, at least up to 400 A. D.
.
TEN
What other problem confronted those who wished to determine the contents of the New Testament? Before the inspired books were recognized as such, many other books had been written and by many were thought to be inspired; hence the Catholic Church made a thorough examination of the whole question; biblical scholars spent years in the Holy Land studying the original languages of New Testament writings.
.
COMMENT: According to the present-day "Bible-only" theory, in the above circumstances, it would also have been necessary for early Christians to read all the doubtful books and, by interior illumination, judge which were and which were not divinely inspired.
.
ELEVEN
Who finally did decide which books were inspired and therefore belonged to the New Testament? Shortly before 400 A. D. a General Council of the Catholic Church, using the infallible authority which Christ had given to His own divine institution, finally decided which books really belonged to the New Testament and which did not.
.
Either the Church at this General Council was infallible, or it was not.
If the Church was infallible then, why is it not infallible now? If the Church was not infallible then, in that case the New Testament is not worth the paper it is written on, because internal evidences of authenticity and inspiration are inconclusive and because the work of this Council cannot now be rechecked; this is obvious from reply to next question.
.
COMMENT: In view of these historical facts, it is difficult to see how non-Catholics can deny that it was from the (Roman) Catholic Church that they received the New Testament.
.
TWELVE
Why is it impossible for modern non-Catholics to check over the work done by the Church previous to 400. A. D.? The original writings were on frail material called papyrus, which had but temporary enduring qualities. While the books judged to be inspired by the Catholic Church were carefully copied by her monks, those rejected at that time were allowed to disintegrate, for lack of further interest in them.
.
COMMENT. What then is left for non-Catholics, except to trust the Catholic Church to have acted under divine inspiration; if at that time, why not now?
.
THIRTEEN
Would the theory of private interpretation of the New Testament have been possible for the year 400 A. D.? No, because, as already stated, no New Testament as such was in existence.
.
COMMENT: If our non-Catholic brethren today had no Bibles, how could they even imagine following the "Bible-only privately interpreted" theory; but before 400 A. D., New Testaments were altogether unavailable.
.
FOURTEEN
Would the private interpretation theory have been possible between 400 A. D. and 1440 A. D., when printing was invented? No, the cost of individual Bibles written by hand was prohibitive; moreover, due to the scarcity of books, and other reasons, the ability to read was limited to a small minority. The Church used art, drama and other means to convey Biblical messages.
.
COMMENT: To have proposed the "Bible-only" theory during the above period would obviously have been impracticable and irrational.
.
FIFTEEN
Who copied and conserved the Bible during the interval between 400 A. D. and 1440 A. D.? The Catholic monks; in many cases these spent their entire lives to give the world personally-penned copies of the Scriptures, before printing was invented.
.
COMMENT: In spite of this, the Catholic Church is accused of having tried to destroy the Bible; had she desired to do this, she had 1500 years within which to do so.
.
SIXTEEN
Who gave the Reformers the authority to change over from the one Faith, one Fold and one Shepherd program, to that of the "Bible-only theory"? St. Paul seems to answer the above when he said: "But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed." (Galations 1-8 - Protestant version ).
.
COMMENT: If in 300 years, one-third of Christianity was split into at least 300 sects, how many sects would three-thirds of Christianity have produced in 1900 years? (Answer is 5700).
.
SEVENTEEN
Since Luther, what consequences have followed from the use of the "Bible-only" theory and its personal interpretation? Just what St. Paul foretold when he said: "For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears." 2 Timothy 4-3 (Protestant edition). According to the World Christian Encyclopedia and other sources, there are 73 different organizations of Methodists, 55 kinds of Baptists, 10 branches of Presbyterians, 17 organizations of Mennonites, 128 of Lutherans and thousands of other denominations.
.
COMMENT: The "Bible-only" theory may indeed cater to the self-exaltation of the individual, but it certainly does not conduce to the acquisition of Divine truth.
.
EIGHTEEN
In Christ's system, what important part has the Bible? The Bible is one precious source of religious truth; other sources are historical records (Tradition) and the abiding presence of the Holy Spirit.
.
COMMENT: Elimination of any one of the three elements in the equation of Christ's true Church would be fatal to its claims to be such.
.
NINETEEN
Now that the New Testament is complete and available, what insolvable problem remains? The impossibility of the Bible to explain itself and the consequent multiplicity of errors which individuals make by their theory of private interpretation. Hence it is indisputable that the Bible must have an authorized interpreter.
.
2 Peter 1-20: Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation.
2 Peter 3-16: As also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction.
Acts 8-30: And Philip ran thither to him, and heard him read the prophet Isaias, and said, understandest thou what thou readest? 31. And he said, How can I except some men should guide me? And he desired Philip that he would come up and sit with him.
COMMENT: Only by going on the supposition that falsehood is as acceptable to God as is truth, can the "Bible-only" theory be defended.
.
TWENTY
Who is the official expounder of the Scriptures? The Holy Spirit, acting through and within the Church which Christ founded nineteen centuries ago; the Bible teaches through whom in the Church come the official interpretations of; God's law and God's word.
.
Luke 10-16: He that heareth you heareth me; and he that despiseth you despiseth me; and he that despiseth me despiseth him that sent me.
Matt. 16-18: And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.
Mal. 2-7: For the priest's lips should keep knowledge, and they should seek the law at his mouth: for he is the messenger of the Lord of hosts.
COMMENT: Formerly at least, it was commonly held that when individuals read their Bibles carefully and prayerfully, the Holy Spirit would guide each individual to a knowledge of the truth. This is much more than the Catholic Church claims for even the Pope himself. Only after extended consultation and study, with much fervent prayer, does he rarely and solemnly make such a decision.
.
TWENTY-ONE
What are the effects of the Catholic use of the Bible? Regardless of what persons may think about the Catholic Church, they must admit that her system gets results in the way of unity of rule and unity of faith; otherwise stated, one Faith, one Fold and one Shepherd.
.
COMMENT: If many millions of non-Catholics in all nations, by reading their Bible carefully and prayerfully, had exactly the same faith, reached the same conclusions, then this theory might deserve the serious consideration of intelligent, well-disposed persons-but not otherwise.
.
TWENTY-TWO
Why are there so many non-Catholic Churches? Because there is so much different interpretation of the Bible; there is so much different interpretation of the Bible because there is so much wrong interpretation; there is so much wrong interpretation because the system of interpreting is radically wrong. You cannot have one Fold and one Shepherd, one Faith and one Baptism, by allowing every man and every woman to distort and pervert the Scriptures to suit his or her own pet theories.
.
COMMENT: To say that Bible reading is an intensely Christian practice, is to enunciate a beautiful truth; to say that Bible reading is the sole source of religious faith, is to make a sadly erroneous statement.
.
TWENTY-THREE
Without Divine aid, could the Catholic Church have maintained her one Faith, one Fold, and one Shepherd? Not any more than the non-Catholic sects have done; they are a proof of what happens when, without Divine aid, groups strive to do the humanly impossible.
.
COMMENT: Catholics love, venerate, use the Bible; but they also know that the Bible alone is not Christ's system but only a precious book, a means, an aid by which the Church carries on her mission to "preach the Gospel to every living creature" and to keep on preaching it "to the end of time."
.
TWENTY-FOUR
Were there any printed Bibles before Luther? When printing was invented about 1440, one of the first, if not the earliest printed book, was an edition of the Catholic Bible printed by John Gutenberg. It is reliably maintained that 626 editions of the Catholic Bible, or portions thereof, had come from the press through the agency of the Church, in countries where her influence prevailed, before Luther's German version appeared in 1534. Of these, many were in various European languages. Hence Luther's "discovery" of the supposedly unknown Bible at Erfurt in 1503 is one of those strange, wild calumnies with which anti-Catholic literature abounds.
.
COMMENT: Today parts of the Bible are read in the vernacular from every Catholic altar every Sunday. The Church grants a spiritual premium or indulgence to those who read the Bible; every Catholic family has, or is supposed to have, a Bible in the home. Millions of Catholic Bibles are sold annually.
.
TWENTY-FIVE
During the Middle Ages, did the Catholic Church manifest hostility to the Bible as her adversaries claim? Under stress of special circumstances, various regulations were made by the Church to protect the people from being spiritually poisoned by the corrupted and distorted translations of the Bible; hence opposition to the Waldensians, Albigensians, Wycliff and Tyndale.
.
COMMENT: Individual churchmen may at times have gone too far in their zeal, not to belittle the Bible, but to protect it. There is no human agency in which authority is always exercised blamelessly.
.
ORIGIN OF CHRIST'S CHURCH
.
The Bible teaches that the true Church began with Christ over 1900 years ago, not with men or women 15 to 19 centuries later. It was founded when Our Lord spoke the following and other similar words:
.
Matt. 28, 18-20: And Jesus came and spake unto them, saying, All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth. Go ye, therefore. and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost: Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and lo, I am with you always, even unto the end of the world. Amen.
COMMENT: History proves that the First Protestant Church was the Lutheran, founded in 1517 by the ex-priest Martin Luther; all other of the some 33,800 sects have been created since then.
.
AUTHORITY OF CHRIST'S CHURCH
.
The Bible teaches that the rulers of Christ's Church have authority which must be obeyed in matters of religion.
.
Heb. 13, 17: Obey them that have the rule over you and submit yourselves: for they watch for your souls as they that must give account, that they may do it with joy, and not with grief: for that is unprofitable for you.
Matt 18-17: And if he shall neglect to hear them tell it unto the church: but if he neglect to hear the church let him be unto thee as an heathen man and a publican.
Luke 10-16: He that heareth you heareth me; and he that despiseth you despiseth me; and he that despiseth me despiseth him that sent me.
Matt. 16-19: And I will give unto thee (Peter) the keys of the kingdom of heaven: and whatsoever thou (Peter) shall bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever thou (Peter) shall loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.
COMMENT: The apostles repeatedly claimed this authority: Gal. 1-8; John 1-10; Acts 15, 23 and 28. Hence the laws or precepts of the true Church are founded upon the same authority as the commandments of God. For the Church of Christ has authority to act in his Name.



TOPICS: Catholic; General Discusssion; Theology
KEYWORDS: bibleonly; faithandphilosophy; nolascriptura; popeonlyisdumb; popesrevelations; privaterevelations; romancatholic; splintersectinrome
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 521-531 next last
To: Responsibility2nd

The thief on the cross wasn’t baptized.


41 posted on 09/11/2023 10:12:42 AM PDT by .510lift
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

Augustine if Hippo may have been the first Protestant


42 posted on 09/11/2023 10:13:39 AM PDT by Colt1851Navy (What was wrong with Nixon?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

The Codex Sinaiticus (Shelfmark: London, British Library, Add MS 43725), designated by siglum א‎ [Aleph] or 01 (in the Gregory-Aland numbering of New Testament manuscripts), δ 2 (in the von Soden numbering of New Testament manuscripts), or Sinai Bible is a fourth century Christian manuscript of a Greek Bible, containing the majority of the Greek Old Testament, including the Apocrypha along with the deuterocanonical books, and the Greek New Testament, with both the Epistle of Barnabas and the Shepherd of Hermas included. It is written in uncial letters on parchment. It is one of the four great uncial codices (these being manuscripts which originally contained the whole of both the Old and New Testaments). Along with Codex Alexandrinus and Codex Vaticanus, it is one of the earliest and most complete manuscripts of the Bible, and contains the oldest complete copy of the New Testament.[1] It is a historical treasure,[2] and using the study of comparative writing styles (palaeography), it has been dated to the mid-fourth century.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Codex_Sinaiticus

In other words, it is from about 350 AD. It was kept in a Greek Orthodox monastery. It dates from before the origin of the Catholic church in the Great Schism of 1054.


43 posted on 09/11/2023 10:14:22 AM PDT by FarCenter (https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/aircraft-glitch-delays-canada-pm-trudeaus-departure-india-202)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: patriot torch

John 1:1
King James Version

1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

*(and the WORD WAS GOD)

*any attempt to discredit the WORD OF GOD is an attempt to discredit God Himself!

John 1:14
King James Version

14 And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.

*(and the WORD WAS MADE FLESH AND DWELT AMONG US.....FULL OF GRACE AND TRUTH)

Any guesses as to WHO this Scripture refers to? (hint, it’s not Mary)

If one denies the WORD OF GOD, they deny the Flesh, which is Jesus Christ.

There is ONLY one Head, NOT two!

1 Corinthians 11:1-4
King James Version
11 Be ye followers of me, even as I also am of Christ.

2 Now I praise you, brethren, that ye remember me in all things, and keep the ordinances, as I delivered them to you.

3 But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the head of the woman is the man; and the head of Christ is God.

4 ***Every man praying or prophesying, having his head covered, dishonoureth his head.***

*(why does the hierarchy of Roman catholicism dishonor Jesus Christ by having their head covered?)

1 Corinthians 6:15-17
King James Version

15 Know ye not that your bodies are the members of Christ? shall I then take the members of Christ, and make them the members of an harlot? God forbid.

16 What? know ye not that he which is joined to an harlot is one body? for two, saith he, shall be one flesh.

17 But he that is joined unto the Lord is one spirit.

Revelation 2: 18-23

18 And unto the angel of the church in Thyatira write; These things saith the Son of God, who hath his eyes like unto a flame of fire, and his feet are like fine brass;

19 I know thy works, and charity, and service, and faith, and thy patience, and thy works; and the last to be more than the first.

20 Notwithstanding I have a few things against thee, because thou sufferest that woman Jezebel, which calleth herself a prophetess, to teach and to seduce my servants to commit fornication, and to eat things sacrificed unto idols.

21 And I gave her space to repent of her fornication; and she repented not.

22 Behold, I will cast her into a bed, and them that commit adultery with her into great tribulation, except they repent of their deeds.

23 And I will kill her children with death; and all the churches shall know that I am he which searcheth the reins and hearts: and I will give unto every one of you according to your works.

where in the New Testament does it authenticate a cardinal? A pope?

1 Timothy 3
King James Version

3 This is a true saying, if a man desire the office of a bishop, he desireth a good work.

2 A bishop then must be blameless, the husband of one wife, vigilant, sober, of good behaviour, given to hospitality, apt to teach;

3 Not given to wine, no striker, not greedy of filthy lucre; but patient, not a brawler, not covetous;

4 One that ruleth well his own house, having his children in subjection with all gravity;

5 (For if a man know not how to rule his own house, how shall he take care of the church of God?)

6 Not a novice, lest being lifted up with pride he fall into the condemnation of the devil.

7 Moreover he must have a good report of them which are without; lest he fall into reproach and the snare of the devil.

8 Likewise must the deacons be grave, not doubletongued, not given to much wine, not greedy of filthy lucre;

9 Holding the mystery of the faith in a pure conscience.

10 And let these also first be proved; then let them use the office of a deacon, being found blameless.

11 Even so must their wives be grave, not slanderers, sober, faithful in all things.

12 Let the deacons be the husbands of one wife, ruling their children and their own houses well.

13 For they that have used the office of a deacon well purchase to themselves a good degree, and great boldness in the faith which is in Christ Jesus.

14 These things write I unto thee, hoping to come unto thee shortly:

15 But if I tarry long, that thou mayest know how thou oughtest to behave thyself in the house of God, which is the church of the living God, the pillar and ground of the truth.

16 And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory

We are to conform to the Word of God, not to a religion, or to a doctrine contrary to the Word of God!


44 posted on 09/11/2023 10:16:46 AM PDT by patriot torch (..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Tell It Right

You imply that certain Christian teachers were Protestant because of small quotes from their bodies of writings... what a laugh!

Each one of those men dedicated himself to the Catholic Church. Each one believed in the Real Presence of Christ in the Eucharist, in the efficacy of the sacraments, in the unity, holiness, universality, and apostolicity of the Catholic Church.


45 posted on 09/11/2023 10:18:57 AM PDT by Chicory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide
In all seriousness, many of us Protestants who are also amateur historians have fond feelings towards the early church before it lost its way. In fact, as recently as the early Protestant reformers (Luther, before him Haas, before him Wycliffe) the RCC had many orders within it that had various ideas. You could call them a kind of mini-denomination within the RCC.

The reformers I just named were part of the Augustinian Order and heavily believed Augustine of Hippo's teachings over the other early church fathers. Thus the reformers' teachings in many ways were Augustine's teachings. (Not all, admittedly, just like nobody in the RCC agrees with all of other early church father teachings).

46 posted on 09/11/2023 10:20:53 AM PDT by Tell It Right (1st Thessalonians 5:21 -- Put everything to the test, hold fast to that which is true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Chicory
Re: infant baptism: the Bible says households were baptized, and St Paul says baptism is the fulfillment of circumcision. 🤔 The Bible says salvation comes though faith, hearing, believing and understanding. Something infants cannot do. Entire households were baptized because they understood their lost condition and no infants were of that household.

Re: the other three: then how is it that other churches teach differently and back up their claims from the Bible? Again. Ignore what other churches stay and focused solely on the word of God. This applies not just to salvation, but how to worship, give, pray and live like Christ.

How do we reconcile that different people glean different meanings from the Bible? Or are we all supposed to agree with you in order to be correct? NEVER agree with me. Or some Pope, Pastor or Priest. Only trust the Word of God. If I or anyone else teaches a point outside the Word - dispute it.

47 posted on 09/11/2023 10:21:59 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd (A truth that’s told with bad intent, Beats all the lies you can invent ~ Wm. Blake)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: .510lift

Neither was Moses, Abraham or thousands of others who died before Christ.

So what’s your point?

Clearly Christ died, was buried and resurrected after the thief. So must YOU be. In baptism.


48 posted on 09/11/2023 10:23:52 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd (A truth that’s told with bad intent, Beats all the lies you can invent ~ Wm. Blake)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Colt1851Navy; Tell It Right

St Augustin on the Catholic Church: https://www.azquotes.com/author/663-Saint_Augustine/tag/church

I think you will be disappointed in your “protestant.”

I am sure similar quotes can be found by each of the other Catholics you (Colt1851Navy) think are Protestant, but I must go and do some IRL work!


49 posted on 09/11/2023 10:23:54 AM PDT by Chicory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: FarCenter

You’ve got it backwards.

The Catholic Church predated the schismatic Orthodox church, which originated in the Great Schism of 1054.


50 posted on 09/11/2023 10:23:56 AM PDT by ebb tide (The pope ... said the church's “catechesis on sex is still in diapers.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: .510lift
The thief on the cross wasn’t baptized.

He also didn't go to heaven that day either.

51 posted on 09/11/2023 10:24:56 AM PDT by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: .510lift

The thief is proof water baptism isn’t needed. We are baptized in the Holy Spirit


52 posted on 09/11/2023 10:25:34 AM PDT by roving (👌⚓Deplorable Listless Vessel with Trumpitist who looks Trumpish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Chicory
You imply that certain Christian teachers were Protestant because of small quotes from their bodies of writings... what a laugh!

Actually, my post was a reply to the challenge: Ok. Tell me who were those "protesants" before 400 A.D. who agreed with the Catholic church.

In other words, I'm saying the early church fathers agreed with the Catholic church in many ways, though their teachings were very much in line with the Protestants today. Particularly regarding the subject matter of this thread: sola scriptura.

53 posted on 09/11/2023 10:25:58 AM PDT by Tell It Right (1st Thessalonians 5:21 -- Put everything to the test, hold fast to that which is true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: DouglasKC

“Who ya going to believe...your lying eyes and the holy spirit bringing you understanding...or what someone else tells you the bible says? There is of course a role for the church and for teachers but if what they teach goes against the bible they are a false church and false disciples.”


That’s my position as well. I can consider the viewpoint of others, but I’ve found it is always best to read the Bible and see for myself the words in the Scripture. For many times others change a word or use a different meaning for a word. Doing so can change the meaning of the entire verse. Often others are trying to deliberately mislead you.

Also, verses have to be taken in context so often you have to read an entire chapter or even book in the Bible to determine the meaning. I’d prefer to get the word from the horse’s mouth so to speak.


54 posted on 09/11/2023 10:27:16 AM PDT by CFW (I will not comply!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide
#1 Did Our Lord write any part of the New Testament or command His Apostles to do so?

2 Peter 1:21 For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man.: but holly men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Spirit.

The writings of the Word of God was sanctioned by God. This makes moot any of the other scribblings of your thread. Which is dumb.

55 posted on 09/11/2023 10:41:48 AM PDT by BipolarBob (Our politicians are such a treasure. You just want to bury them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chicory
St Augustin on the Catholic Church: https://www.azquotes.com/author/663-Saint_Augustine/tag/church I think you will be disappointed in your “protestant.” I am sure similar quotes can be found by each of the other Catholics you (Colt1851Navy) think are Protestant, but I must go and do some IRL work!

Thank you for making the point regarding Sola Scriptura. Both Protestants and Catholics can find quotes from the early church fathers for and against each "side". Likewise, if we're honest, there are things some of them believed that neither RCC'ers nor Protestants today believe (i.e. some of them believed in instantaneous creation, not taking even 7 days). And if us Protestants are honest, there are problems some of us have with a few of the teachings of the early reformers.

So how do we know what to believe? Answer: What we know to be written by the apostles: SCRIPTURE!!!

56 posted on 09/11/2023 10:43:49 AM PDT by Tell It Right (1st Thessalonians 5:21 -- Put everything to the test, hold fast to that which is true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: BipolarBob
2 Peter 1:21 For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man.: but holly men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Spirit.

How shrewd! Using the so-called "first pope" for an argument for Sola Scriptura. LOL

57 posted on 09/11/2023 10:45:02 AM PDT by Tell It Right (1st Thessalonians 5:21 -- Put everything to the test, hold fast to that which is true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

The Word of God is inspired by God. The roman catholic church is not.

God is infallible. The pope is not.

Lent is not Scriptural. Nor is purgatory.

Man cannot forgive sins.

All meat is to be received if cleansed by God.

Isn’t fish a meat? Why doesn’t this false doctrine go back to the Church origin? Because it can’t be supported by the Inspired Word of God.

Why are catholic priests not allowed to marry? The Word of God warns against such doctrines.

Why does the catholic church allow cardinals (which is not even a Scriptural office) to VOTE into a false throne, a false head of the catholic church? Nowhere in the Bible does such an office appear.

We are to bow before the Lord Jesus Christ. Not some clown posing as the head. And certainly not to kiss his ring. This is idolotry.


58 posted on 09/11/2023 10:46:15 AM PDT by patriot torch (..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BipolarBob
2 Peter 1:21 For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man.: but hol[l]y men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Spirit.

Do you even know the difference between "spake" and "wrote"?

Obviously not.

59 posted on 09/11/2023 10:48:23 AM PDT by ebb tide (The pope ... said the church's “catechesis on sex is still in diapers.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: All

Doesn’t everyone know that the pope and all the embedded child molesters know the truth all of you should be following? They are so serious about getting their truth out that they are willing to bankrupts dioceses the world over.

Listen to all the child molesters! They know how wrong the Bible is, and how wrong each of you are, in following it.


60 posted on 09/11/2023 10:50:23 AM PDT by ConservativeMind (Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 521-531 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson