Posted on 05/18/2023 7:02:08 PM PDT by marshmallow
NEW YORK, May 19 (C-Fam) The Biden administration is pressing countries to adopt homosexual marriage as a human right. This new development comes during the latest cycles of the UN’s Universal Periodic Review.
U.S. officials called on the government of Serbia to “legalize same-sex unions” last week during the latest round of the process where governments criticize each other on questions of human rights. The Biden administration also called on Korea and Japan to “provide legal recognition of same-sex marriage.”
The Biden administration claims homosexual marriage or unions are required by human rights law “to guarantee equal protection under the law for members of same-sex couples.”
Promoting homosexual marriage abroad is unprecedented from any U.S. administration. Even the Obama administration, under Secretary Hillary Clinton, which declared LGBT issues a priority in U.S. foreign policy, did not promote homosexual marriage as a human right.
The Universal Periodic Review is a mechanism of the Human Rights Council to review the human rights record of every country on a rolling basis. The distinctive feature of the process is that it allows other countries to comment on the country under review.
In theory, countries under review should only be held accountable to human rights obligations that exist in agreed upon treaties, and that governments have agreed to. Inevitably, the process has become politicized as countries try to promote their preferred policies as human rights obligations.
(Excerpt) Read more at c-fam.org ...
Exactly. I know men who collect alimony from their ex-wives and women who pay alimony to their ex-husbands.
Whoever earns more pays alimony. If the women earns more, she pays alimony.
Whoever has primary physical custody of the children collects child support.
97% of alimony is from men to women.
Courts are biased when it comes to placing children with women so child support is de facto alimony 2. Most men would take 50/50 custody with 0 child support but women and family courts wouldn’t take money from the man if they did this.
This is one area where many european countries far excel the usa, divorce laws. Their system is not set up to be adversarial and seriously biased towards women. The american system mpis adversarial on purpose and makes over 60 billion dollars off divorce every year.
That’s not an accurate description of what’s happening in family courts, at least not in my state. The court awards primary custody to the parent (mother or father) who stays in the family home with the children, unless that parent wants to give up primary physical custody to the other parent. That’s how it works.
And women almost always get the house, which means they get primary of the kids, because the court will not take the kids out of the house. It pretty much does work this way.
In my state, whoever stays in the house gets the house, but must pay 50% of the equity to the ex-spouse who leaves the house. (It might work the same way in other states.)
globohomos
Biden Pushes Redefining Marriage to Include Homosexuals as a Binding Human Right
Make the world safe for perverts—that is their foreign policy goal—they should just come out and say it.
LOL, Mr potato head has no idea what he endorses, it is the unelected mob steering the thought and actions of a demented fool.
Except for those racist white supremacists huh Moe.
God can’t be happy with the promotion of butt darts
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.