Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New York Judge Questions Legal Basis for Limiting Marriage to Two People
LifeSite News ^ | 9/27/22 | Calvin Freiburger

Posted on 10/01/2022 6:26:09 PM PDT by marshmallow

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last

1 posted on 10/01/2022 6:26:09 PM PDT by marshmallow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

A woman judge.

Women have fostered the entire growth of the pervert parade in this country, and they continue to do so.


2 posted on 10/01/2022 6:27:34 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

Anthony Kennedy. The gift that keeps on giving.


3 posted on 10/01/2022 6:28:13 PM PDT by ChuckHam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

A lot of people owe Rick Santorum a lot of apologies.


4 posted on 10/01/2022 6:28:23 PM PDT by Engraved-on-His-hands
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

It goes back to women voters.


5 posted on 10/01/2022 6:28:53 PM PDT by ChuckHam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ChuckHam

And administrstors. And shrinks. And advocates. And politicians.


6 posted on 10/01/2022 6:29:42 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

Oh, the lawyers are salivating over this.


7 posted on 10/01/2022 6:29:52 PM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer” )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

Remember how the liberals laughed at all of us who questioned homosexual marriage leading to polygamy, or group marriage?? In true Alinsky style, we were all ridiculed. It may happen that monogamy itself will be ruled to be discrimination.


8 posted on 10/01/2022 6:31:08 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Engraved-on-His-hands

Yes, indeed.

I remember a lot of people on social media making fun of people as “bat(excrement) crazy” for suggesting this would be coming next.

But, if same-sex “marriage” makes sense, this certainly does as well. Can’t claim it is any more illogical. Marriage means union of a husband and wife...so for the courts to rule that two men or two women can enter into this union and the total illogic such a ruling is, certainly multiple people can as well since reality and the meaning of words were already tossed out the window as a basis for which to base a legal opinion.


9 posted on 10/01/2022 6:35:06 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

Couldn’t see that one coming , could we?


10 posted on 10/01/2022 6:35:13 PM PDT by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith….)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

Like Robert Bork wrote, we’re slouching toward Gomorrah.


11 posted on 10/01/2022 6:35:16 PM PDT by HonorInPa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

Big words, majoritarian animus...

It’s because the majority agreed that marriage WOULD consist of a dyad.
Words have specific meanings or they have no meaning.
It was stupid enough when the courts decided that queers could legally marry....now you get this crap.

Next: Woman wants to marry a jar of kosher dills and change her name to Vlasic. Court says why not...except for majoritarian animus, of course.


12 posted on 10/01/2022 6:36:27 PM PDT by Adder (ALL Democrats are the enemy. NO QUARTER!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

Men have been for polygamy for centuries.

And now it’s a woman’s fault?

BWAHAHAHHA!!!!!

Men, faithfully blame shifting since the Fall.


13 posted on 10/01/2022 6:36:44 PM PDT by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith….)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: HonorInPa

We are no longer slouching towards Gomorrah.

We are racing towards it at Warp Factor 8.


14 posted on 10/01/2022 6:37:48 PM PDT by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith….)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: metmom

Polygamy doesn’t mean marriage.

Guys want to sleep with young, good looking, fertile women. No kidding.

Women are hypergamous and are concerned about securing male resources. Marriage has always been the social security for women. Not men.

Nice try.

Women have pushed the societal changes to make perversions acceptable. There is no male equivalent of a “fag hag”, as just one societal example.


15 posted on 10/01/2022 6:40:59 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat

More perversion.

I see a lotta ‘crimes of passion’ coming.


16 posted on 10/01/2022 6:46:10 PM PDT by citizen (Thieves of private property pass their lives in chains; thieves of public prop. in riches and luxury)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

Here we go.
“If there are no absolutes by which to judge society, then society is absolute.” Francis Schaeffer, How Shall We Then Live? (Old Tappan NJ: Fleming H Revell Company, 1976), p. 224.


17 posted on 10/01/2022 6:55:00 PM PDT by Fungi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
I thought that, going back to Biblical times, the reason that Judaism descended through the mother was to ensure lineage for inheritance purposes. People were always sure who the mother was, but in polygamous relationships the father was always in doubt.

Even today, lineage and inheritance are much clearer in monogamous relationships.

-PJ

18 posted on 10/01/2022 6:55:41 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too ( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

“Is there really any legal basis for limiting my power at all?”


19 posted on 10/01/2022 6:58:30 PM PDT by cmj328 (We live here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow; Secret Agent Man; Travis McGee

Bong-huffing judge KAREN May Bacdayan . . .

Sure, KAREN, go on and support state-sanctioned adultery.


20 posted on 10/01/2022 6:59:19 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (FBI out of Florida!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson