Posted on 10/08/2020 9:36:50 AM PDT by Salman
Growing up in a strict Baptist family, Nikole Mitchell was expected to be quiet, reserved and sweet. But her dreams weren’t quite so conservative.
“From a young age, I had fantasized about being a stripper,” Mitchell, who now works as an erotic dancer on OnlyFans, told The Post. “But I was indoctrinated to believe my desires and my body were innately sinful and bad.”
So instead of pursuing the pole, the mother of three went all-in on religion — and became a pastor. Even that, however, was rebellious in her family’s eyes.
“I was taught that women aren’t allowed to lead and that women belong in the kitchen and with the children,” said Mitchell, 36. “So even though it went against everything I was told, I decided to become [a pastor] because of my love for performing.”
In 2011, Mitchell, along with her now ex-husband, joined the Woodland Hills Church — an evangelist megachurch in St. Paul, Minnesota — which opened her eyes to the possibility of gender equality within the faith.
...
(Excerpt) Read more at ladbible.com ...
Humm.
Full disclosure, I haven’t been in a strip club/ “gentlemans” club in about 20 years, so I’m not up to what is in style now, but she seems to be lacking a few attributes that were the main draw back in my day.
As for the “pastor” thing, yeah, nahh not reality.
But it got her name out there.
Me me me, as opposed to dying to self.
The spirit of the age.
(She finally hung up her YouTube account maybe a year ago.)
Yeah, I know. She had mental health issues (not funny) and I do hope that she got her life back together.
https://mashable.com/video/overly-attached-girlfriend-laina-morris-leaves-youtube/
He does indeed.
I hope she repents.
sorry- She’s a stripper- why are you denying that? the article mentioned she was a stripper 7 or so times- You think strippers are godly people who ‘give a gift to others’?
It’s in the eyes... Smoking hot lady, but you know looking in those eyes that she’s no a keeper... She’s a creeper and likely Batsh*t Crazy.
Based on the evidence presented in post 11, I’m going to say Not Guilty.
Yes, that sounds like a true calling.
Here is what is sacred -- "Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh." Did the "pastor" get around to reading about that? I mean, it's right at the beginning of the Book.
“My sexuality is incredibly healing and sacred. And when I give this gift to people, it blesses them.”
Blessed with her sex.
She is a hot mess. May God have mercy on her. I don’t think her life ends well, but who knows? The bible says not to judge her so I won’t, but I definitely have some strong opinions.
Hot liberal women. This is really all they are good for. Not marriage or friendship.
It gets even better folks. She gets the hat trick.
She is a lesbian.
Not kidding.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K1q9-kAtgjM
My mistake, she is Bisexual.
My mistake, she is Bisexual.
Why is the New York Post printing an article like this about this poor mixed up individual? Nobody cares!
“I was taught that women aren’t allowed to lead and that women belong in the kitchen and with the children”
So she decided to go out and prove the people saying that were right, eh?
“Being a christian dancer ain’t ‘selling it’...”
It’s certainly not being modest and obeying commandments not to tempt your fellow man, to serve God and not mammon, etc.
“You think strippers are godly people who ‘give a gift to others’?”
Even if one wanted to believe that, she clearly is not giving any “gifts”, since gifts are free, while she is on OnlyFans charging hard currency for what she is selling.
my point was- people try to excuse sin by claiming it’s ‘beautiful and a gift’ to others- etc- she claims she is ‘giving a gift’ to others- but nope- she isn’t- she’s sinning while claiming it isn’t because it’s ‘beautiful’ or whatever- she’s confused about God and religion- trying to create God in her own image- instead of listenign to His word-
True, really she is tempting others to sin, so it’s the opposite of a “gift”.
I was just saying, even if you didn’t agree with that moral position, you can’t even honestly say it’s a “gift” under any definition, since she is most definitely charging money for it.
Matters nothing as far as the subject matter of the article.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.