Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The encounter of Zoroastrianism with Islam in Iran
Jstor ^ | Apr 2002 | Marietta Stepaniants

Posted on 05/27/2019 2:30:22 AM PDT by Cronos

Among the many stories of encounters between different cultures, the meeting of Zoroastrianism and Islam may be one of the most dramatic. After many centuries in which it was the dominant religion of the ancient Iranian states and after having achieved the status of official religion in the Sassanid Empire (224-651 AD), Zoroastrian teaching was practically driven from its homeland and replaced by the religion of Muhammad. The number of Zoroastrians in modern Iran today does not exceed forty thousand..... and total number worldwide is reckoned to be less than 120,000. It is difficult to describe the fate of Zoroastrianism more precisely than was done by james Darmestester in 1879 in his introduction to the translation of the Zend-Avesta "As the Parsis are the ruins of a people, so are their sacred books the ruin of a religion. There has been no other great belief in the world that ever left such poor and meager monuments of its past spendor"

... There are two opposing versions of the events surrounding the first encounter. One says that the Zoroastrians were converted by the Arabs at the point of the sword: "All that was Iran's whether spiritual or material was swept away by the Arabs - a sacrifice of their fanaticism. The religion, the language, the orthography, and the manners and customs of Iran took quite a different complexion or got entirely abolished"

..some historians claim that "the masses" willingly embraced islam... During the Sassanid dynasty, Zoroastrianism was transformed into an instrument of politics. Arnold Toynbee believes that "Zoroastrianism had in the end to pay as heavily as Jewry for having lent itself to a political enterprise" under Ardashir (226-242) the Sassanid state became a full-fledged theocracy. Ardashir was himself a priest who had inherited his profession from a long line of ancestors...

(Excerpt) Read more at jstor.org ...


TOPICS: History; Other non-Christian
KEYWORDS: faithandphilosophy; india; iran; kurdistan; zoroaster; zoroastrian; zoroastrianism; zoroastrians
One of the Umayyad Caliphs was quoted saying, "milk the Persians and once their milk dries, suck their blood".
1 posted on 05/27/2019 2:30:22 AM PDT by Cronos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cronos

Persia and Greece wore themselves out fighting each other just in time for worshippers of mohammed to take advantage of the consequent fatal weakness.


2 posted on 05/27/2019 4:29:19 AM PDT by Gratia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gratia

Not Persia and Greece.

Persia was/is Fars/Pars - one of the provinces of the Iranian Empire. They always called themselves the Iranian Empire - consisting of various Irani peoples like the Persians, the Medes, the Kurds, the Baluchis, the Tajikis (Sogdians), Bactrians, the Parthians. You had other Irani peoples like the Sarmatians, the Alans (ancestors of modern day Ossetians ) etc.

This was technically the Sassanid Iranian Empire - the empire of the “truth” “Aryan” - Iran is derived from the same root as Aryan/Iron/Alan

There were no “Greeks” by the 7th century. They called themselves Romans. This was not the “Byzantine Empire” - a term coined by later Rennaissance writers to create the other, but this was the ROMAN Empire with the Basileus, emperor of Rome.

This was acknowledged by the Ottomans who called their conquered lands as the Sultanate of RUM (Rome).

the greek speaking, orthodox called themselves Romaoi - Romans right until the 1800s when Shelley and other romantics tried to connect them to the hoary past of Socrates rather than to Christian Constantinople


3 posted on 05/27/2019 4:42:09 AM PDT by Cronos (Obama hated Assad as he wasn't a Muslim but an Alawite)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

ping


4 posted on 05/27/2019 5:15:13 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gratia

That and the several bouts of the plague that ravaged the Mediterranean world during the years that preceded the Islamic expansion.


5 posted on 05/27/2019 5:25:51 AM PDT by Destroyer Sailor (Revenge is a dish best served cold.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

It is a very old human story. When the secular state and religion are married, corruption enters - the state corrupts the religion, turning it into a legally granted orthodoxy and its orthodoxy corrupts the state, turning it into an arm of enforcement of the orthodoxy - and decay follows.


6 posted on 05/27/2019 5:27:19 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gratia
Persia and Greece wore themselves out fighting each other just in time for worshippers of mohammed to take advantage of the consequent fatal weakness.

What a perfect lesson for the USA.

7 posted on 05/27/2019 5:57:39 AM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Gratia

You’re off by 1000 years or so!

Fall of the Persian Empire to Alexander 329 BC
Rise of Islam 629 AD

Ok say off 960 years


8 posted on 05/27/2019 7:22:59 AM PDT by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Arnold Toynbee believes that "Zoroastrianism had in the end to pay as heavily as Jewry for having lent itself to a political enterprise"...
Toynbee, what a jackass.

9 posted on 05/27/2019 2:44:59 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

The keywords zoroaster, zoroastrian, zoroastrianism, and zoroastrians, sorted chrono, duplicates out:

10 posted on 05/27/2019 3:00:52 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cronos

OMG, you are really, really smart!

I realize you understood that I was talking about the Byrzantine/Sasanian War, but I wanted to make a point even the less intelligent people would understand. Smart people like us have to talk down to the less intelligent, as you are well aware.

And DO NOT even get me started on Persia just being a province whose name was generalized! How can the dumb people be expected to know THAT?


11 posted on 05/28/2019 2:22:31 AM PDT by Gratia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Gratia

Hardly - smart I’d consider if I demonstrated ability to co-relate and innovate.

People can’t be expected to know about Iran vs Persia, but we can help change people’s definitions and point of recall. For instance I refuse to call liberals as “progressive” or to use the term “pro-choice” as it then indicates that those who disagree with these views are “not progressive” and “anti-choice”.


12 posted on 05/28/2019 2:44:32 AM PDT by Cronos (Obama hated Assad as he wasn't a Muslim but an Alawite)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson