Nobody argued with the policy that a "retreat" could cure a sodomite from his desire to bugger boys either.
So the KGB sent a whole bunch of homosexual Russian agents to join the Roman Catholic Church in the 1930s. So many that they all got into positions of power quickly inside the church, took over the majority of the bishop posts and leadership of the seminaries and deceived all the faithful priests.
So it was not really the Roman Catholic Church who was doing it even though they allowed those KGB agents in and then promoted them and followed them blindly.
O-kay.
You argue this like a leftist argues politics—with blind malice, impervious to fact.
The placement of agents in seminaries is fact, exposed in Soviet documents after the fall of the USSR.
You misrepresent a period of decades—two, three, four, five decades—as “quickly.”
You dishonestly restate my position to an unlikely extreme—that they “all” rose to power, that “the majority” of bishops are these first-generation agents, and that they “deceived all” the faithful priests. That’s three lies in one sentence, comrade.
The next sentence contains only two lies: that the Church “allowed” these agents and their recruits into the priesthood and then “followed them blindly.”
Instead of arguing against what was said, you invented five lies and attributed them to me.
Shameful.
Conservatives are, above all, honest.
You really think the KGB wasn’t good enough to infiltrate agents into seminaries? An active agent of the USSR was a trusted aide pushing FDR’s wheelchair at Yalta.
You really think that none of these highly intelligent, highly trained agents could rise within the clergy over twenty, thirty, or forty years? You really think these agents couldn’t draw in more sodomites behind them?
You really believe that none of the sodomite bishops were brought in by sodomites who were brought in by sodomites who were brought in by these highly intelligent and trained agents?
You’re so eager to blame the victim that you’re willing to say anything.