Now for your next trick you go from arguing against the viability of "Bible only" - strawman that that is - based on rebellion against the Bible, to arguing against availability of the Bible based on rebellion against the Bible! All the while blissfully ignoring that where your alternative, Catholicism, predominates so does liberalism, and that most liberal are those who hold the Bible in the least esteem, while it remains that the most conservative are those who most strongly affirm the authority and integrity of Scripture and read it the most. Which is what you must attack if you will attack us.
Instead, all you can do is use a strawman as an argument, that the mere availability of the Bible is not enough to preserve society, which is not in debate, nor it is any argument against availability and esteem of it, since it does effect righteousness to those who can read and or hear it as being the wholly inspired and accurate word of God. And thus all attempts to attack this remain utterly vain.
Despite the prevalence of the Bible translated into the vernacular the Christian faith continues to decline ... Having the Bible in the hands of the people did not make them more Christian as a nation, or at least not sustainably. This experiment already occurred in Europe so that it is not a recent generation or two. 54 posted on 2/21/2018, 6:27:31 AM by af_vet_1981 (The bus came by and I got on, That's when it all began.) [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse]
...before we find: