Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Salvation

Incorrect.

The word ‘so’ is same as ‘because’ or it follows.

I wrote this comment,
- so -
that I could correct the author’s fallcy.


41 posted on 01/19/2018 8:17:12 AM PST by TheNext
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: TheNext

fallcy. Do you mean fallacy?


43 posted on 01/19/2018 8:19:23 AM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: TheNext

Good point for a specific application, yet even in that case “so that I could” can be replaced succinctly by “to”.


46 posted on 01/19/2018 8:20:23 AM PST by glennaro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: TheNext

That is correct usage for “so”. So, what does that have to do with the usage as an interjection at the beginning of a sentence? :=)


101 posted on 01/19/2018 8:55:26 AM PST by Bob (Damn, the democrats haven't been this upset since Republicans freed their slaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: TheNext

Incorrect.

The word ‘so’ is same as ‘because’ or it follows.

I wrote this comment,
- so -
that I could correct the author’s fallcy.

____________________________________________

I believe the author is picking on the word ‘so’ as it is ‘so’ overused, that it’s ‘so’ fricking unbelievable.

It’s like someone going ‘uh’ or ‘like’ as they speak. It’s a verbal stammer.


103 posted on 01/19/2018 8:57:04 AM PST by Responsibility2nd (R2: Proudly intruding since 1958)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson