Posted on 11/09/2017 1:57:06 PM PST by ebb tide
De Mattei: Pope Francis and his Lutheran turning point
So the shoe does fit.
***
Ahahahahah.
You just admitted that the term is accurate.
What a crybaby you are, calls everyone nasty names and then acts all offended when someone returns the favor.
I really shouldn’t cast pearls before swine, but it’s just so FUNNY to watch your hypocrisy.
This is your most pathetic attempt yet at avoiding telling us who you hold to be the last valid pope, without which answer any assertion that you have not failed to submit to any Catholic pope is meaningless, let alone what you would consider failing to submit. Again, what's to hide?
Since we seek to answer to your question, "where have I not submitted to any Catholic pope," but are not to badger a poster with a question they refuse to answer, the most I can provide are some things you said in the past, and let others form their opinions of a poster who incessantly attacks a pope, including articles which reject Francis a being a valid one, while presenting himself as one who has not failed to submit to any pope.
In the past you called Evangelli Gaudium to be heretical, an example of formal heresy making Francis/Bergoglio a heretical pope, not just a bad pope , and stated that neither an apostate, nor a heretic, can be a valid pope, and considered the statement of Nostra Aetate (and the CCC) that Muslims"together with us (Catholics) they adore the one, merciful God to be heretical (though it is), and denied submission to Francis, thus at least Francis should be out as one who have been in submission to (no real surprise). But you also disagreed with the statement that "there was no change in Catholic belief regarding the godhead at Vatican II," but (at least last year ) went to FSSP Tridentine Mass, which broke off from the SSPX , and is answerable to pope Francis, and criticized those who attend Mass in Novus Ordo parishes.
Thus both what claimed submission to any pope and who is a real faithful Catholic are subject to interpretation by you as well as others.
Another non-answer.
You are continually being exposed and it seems that everyone can see it but you.
But it also occurs to me that maybe you do see it too, which is why you resort to posts of the likes of yours here.
Maybe they mean I need a priest to interpret the Catholic sources for me. No thanks. I dont interpret Catholic sources. I just read it, and tell you what it says. 😆😄👍😂😁 Heard that before?
Yes. . IIRC, it’s the “Catholic” method of doing it.
Right?
Right?
Exactly. I feel good right now. I just committed the sin of presumption. I dont like other sins, but I DO like that one. 😇🇵🇭 Its 2 AM Sunday morning here. Why am I still awake? 🤯😁
Can. 831 §1 Unless there is a just and reasonable cause, no member of Christ's faithful may write in newspapers, pamphlets or periodicals which clearly are accustomed to attack the catholic religion or good morals. Clerics and members of religious institutes may write in them only with the permission of the local Ordinary. - http://www.intratext.com/IXT/ENG0017/_P2P.HTM
The Gnostics made similar claims. Only they had the "special" insight.
Who do you consider the last valid pope?
What's to hide?
I don't read these religion discussion threads except for posts when I look at "Latest Posts." There seems to be so much animosity.
I did not send this post to any person in particular, just sharing my thoughts on what is happening around the world as Christians are being displaced or even destroyed.
For example, Mormons claim to be Christians yet they are not due to their beliefs.
Our Roman Catholic friends post a lot of material everyday that contains false information. Some of us attempt to contrast what the Bible says and what Roman Catholicism says. On a lot of the important issues the two are in conflict. Roman Catholics don't like it when those are noted.
They also don't like it when Roman Catholic documents are used to show the contradictions within their own denomination.
When confronted with these, a number of Roman Catholics resort to a personal attack and/or profanity and avoid the issue.
For example, one Roman Catholic, who seems to strongly dislike the current pope and doesn't consider him to be legit has been asked who he thinks was the last legit pope. A simple question right?
Yet he refuses to answer for some reason only known to himself.
If his bishop knew about the things he posts and apparently believes; would he be able to receive communion?
Too many good friends and good conversation.
We don't have to follow THAT; either!
Ecclesiastes 10:20
Do not revile the king even in your thoughts,
or curse the rich in your bedroom,
because a bird in the sky may carry your words,
and a bird on the wing may report what you say.
Too many good friends and good conversation.
True, as we discuss things quietly among ourselves. The most beautiful thing, is to talk about assurance of salvation. Just dont talk to loud, because there are some people around, who have NO assurance of salvation. Its possible they dont think ANYONE can have it, and we dont want to disturb them, so keep it low. 😀😆😄👍🇵🇭
They don't know if they have the Spirit....they don't know if they're saved...man, it must be a nightmare to be Roman Catholic. Everyday lived in fear.
It's amazing the lack of Biblical knowledge among Roman Catholics....and they claim they gave us the Book!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.