Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

De Mattei: Pope Francis and his “Lutheran turning point”
Rorate Caeli ^ | November 8, 2017 | Roberto de Mattei

Posted on 11/09/2017 1:57:06 PM PST by ebb tide

De Mattei: Pope Francis and his “Lutheran turning point”

Roberto de Mattei
Corrispondenza Romana
November 8 2017




On October 31st 2016, Pope Francis inaugurated the year of Luther by meeting with representatives of Lutheranism from all over the world in the Swedish Cathedral of Lund. Since then, meetings and “ecumenical” celebrations ad abundantiam have followed one after the other in the Catholic Church.

A year exactly from that date, the “”Lutheran turning point ”was sealed by a symbolic act the gravity of which very few have noticed. The Vatican Post Office issued a stamp which celebrates the birth of Protestantism on October 31st 1517, the date Luther hung his 95 theses on the door of Wittenberg Cathedral.

V Centenary of the Protestant Reformationcan be read at the top of the stamp, presented on October 31st of this year by the Vatican Philatelic Office.  The official communiqué describes the stamp: It depicts Jesus Crucified in the foreground on a gold, timeless background showing Wittenberg city. In an attitude of penance, on their knees respectively on the left and the right of the the Cross, Martin Luther holds a Bible, source and point of his doctrine, while Philip Melanchthon, theologian and a friend of Martin Luther’s, one of the most important protagonists of the Reformation, holds in his hand the Augsburg Confession, Confessio Augustuana, the first official exposition of the principles of Protestantism drawn up by him.”

The substitution of Our Lady and St. John at the foot of the Cross with the  two heresiarchs, Luther and Melanchthon is a blasphemous offense that no Catholic cardinal or bishop has, to date, openly condemned. The significance of this image is explained by the joint declaration of the World Lutheran Federation and the Pontifical Council for the Promotion of Christian Unity, published the same day as the stamp. The note refers to the positive outcome of the dialogue between Catholics and Lutherans, endorsing the “new understanding of those XVI century events which lead to our separation” and affirms how both sides are “very grateful for the theological and spiritual gifts received through the Reformation”.


As if that weren’t enough, around the same time, La Civiltà Cattolica, the Pope’s “unofficial” voice, celebrated Luther  with  an article by Father Giancarlo Pani (Martin Luther, Five Hundred Years Later, in La Civiltà Cattolica , of October 21st – November 4th 2017, pp. 119-130)

Father Pani is the same priest who said in 2014 that the Fathers of the Council of Trent had admitted the possibility of divorce and remarriage in the case of adultery, according to the custom established in the schismatic Greek Church. Now he is sustaining that Martin Luther was in no way a heretic, but an authentic “reformer”.  In fact, “ the theses of Wittenberg are not a challenge, nor a rebellion against authority, but the proposal to renew the proclamation of the Gospel, in the sincere desire for a “reform” in the Church”. (p.128). Despite the claim “ by the Church of Rome and Luther of incarnating the truth in toto and being dispensers of it ” “ the role Luther had as a witness to the faith cannot be denied: He is “the reformer”;  he was able to initiate a process of “reform”  where the results of it  have also benefited the Catholic Church.”

If this is the case then he has been unjustly persecuted and defamed by the Catholic Church for 500 years. The time has come to rehabilitate him.  And in order to rehabilitate him we cannot limit ourselves to presenting only his prophetic side, but must make the Church accept and put into practice his demands of reform. And the Post-Synod Exhortation Amoris Laetitia represents a decisive stage on this path. They are not wrong then the authors of the Correctio filialis  (to Pope Francis) when they underlined “the affinity between Luther’s ideas on the law, justification and matrimony and those taught  or favored by Pope Francis in Amoris laetitia and elsewhere.” 

At this point it should be remembered that Pope Francis, like Father Pani, belongs to the Company of Jesus, whose Founder, St. Ignatius of Loyola, was the champion of the Faith that Divine Providence raised up in the XVI century against Lutheranism. In Germany, apostles like St. Peter Canisio and Blessed Peter Fabro, fought every inch of the way against the heretics and on the terrain of anti-Protestant controversy no-one can surpass St. Robert Bellarmino.

La Civiltà Cattolica was founded in 1850, with the support of Pius IX, and had a role of doctrinal defense against the errors of the time for a very long time. From its very first edition, on April 6th 1850, it dedicated an extensive anonymous essay (by Father Matteo Liberatore) on The Political Rationalism of the Italian Revolution, in which he saw Protestantism as the cause of all modern errors. These theses were developed, among others, by two famous Jesuit theologians: Fathers Giovanni Perrone (Protestantism and the Rule of the Faith, La Civiltà Cattolica, Rome 1853, 2 voll.), and Hartmann Grisar (Luther, Herder, Freiburg im Breisgau, 1911/1912, 3 voll.).

But the commemoration of the Lutheran revolt made by the Jesuit journal in October 1917, the fourth centenary marking the 95 theses in Wittenberg, takes on a special meaning.  (Luther and Lutheranism, in La Civiltà Cattolica, IV (1917), pp. 207-233; 421-430). The theologian of La Civiltà Cattolica explained that “The essence of the Lutheran spirit, or rather Lutheranism, is rebellion in all of its extension and in all the force of its word. Rebellion, therefore, which is personified in Luther, was varied and profound, complex and very vast; which apparently appeared but was in fact violent, angry, trivial, obscene and diabolic; deep down it was studied, and directed according to the circumstances, focused on opportunistic ends and interests, intended and wanted with  measured, resolute determination.” (pp.208-309).

Luther, La Civiltà Cattolica continues, “initiated that contemptible parody, with which the rebel monk attributed to God, his ideas, blasphemies and the abominations of his perverted mind: he outraged the Pope in an unspeakable way in the name of Christ, he cursed Caesar in the name of Christ, he blasphemed against the Church, against bishops, against monks with absolute infernal impetuosity, in the name of Christ; he threw his religious habit onto the tree of Judas, in the name of Christ and in the name of Christ he was married sacrilegiously” (p.209). “With the very convenient pretext of following Scripture, as that which alone contains the word of God, he conducted a war on scholastic theology, tradition, canon law, all the institutions and precepts of the Church and councils: in place of these august and venerated things, he, Martin Luther, perjured monk and self-proclaimed doctor, put himself and his authority! Popes, doctors and Holy Fathers were no longer of any worth; the word of Marin Luther was worth more than all of them!  (p.212). The Lutheran theory of justification, in the end, “was born of Luther’s imagination, not by the Gospel or any other word of God revealed to the writers of the New Testament: for us, every Lutheran novelty finds its origins in the concupiscence he stimulated, and in his development of the falsification of Scripture or in formal lying” (p.214

Father Pani cannot deny that the opinion he gives of Luther is a 360 degree turnaround from the one his confreres gave in the same journal, a century ago.  In 1917,  he was censured as an apostate, a rebel, a blasphemer; today he is being praised as a reformer, a prophet, [even] holy. No Hegelian dialectic can harmonize yesterday’s judgment with today’s. Luther was either a heretic who denied some basic dogmas of Christianity, or he was a “witness to faith” who initiated  the Reformation of the Church, brought to completion by the Second Vatican Council and Pope Francis.

In short, every Catholic is called upon to choose whether to side with Pope Francis and the Jesuits of today, or be alongside the Jesuits of yesterday and the Popes of all time.

It is time for choices and to mediate precisely on St. Ignatius’ two standards (Spiritual Exercises, n. 137)* which will help us make them in these difficult times.



*Translator’s note: ”It will be here how Christ calls and wants all under His standard; and Lucifer, on the contrary, under his.” (no. 137, Spiritual Exercises).



Translation: Contributor Francesca Romana



TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; Theology; Worship
KEYWORDS: francischurch; heresy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 381-393 next last
To: Boogieman; ealgeone; metmom
Calling a Spade, a Spade

Now go talk amongst yourselves.

241 posted on 11/10/2017 9:21:48 AM PST by ebb tide (We have a rogue curia in Rome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies]

To: Mark17

Heh. I’ll come up with something limericky myself sometime!


242 posted on 11/10/2017 9:23:01 AM PST by Luircin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman
We don’t pretend to be members of a church that demands we accept him as a requisite of membership.

And if it did, I would run away from it real fast. In fact, I did exactly that, as I ran from the Catholic Church. 😀😆😱

243 posted on 11/10/2017 9:24:10 AM PST by Mark17 (Genesis chapter 1 verse 1. In the beginning GOD....And the rest, as they say, is HIS-story)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

Ebb tide, once again showing the courage and bravery to face up to all challenges of his faith, with two glorious words. I quote him now:

“RUN AWAY! RUN AWAY!”


244 posted on 11/10/2017 9:24:45 AM PST by Luircin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide
You can't refute anything we've posted to you on this thread...or others for that matter.

Now run along and do what your pope tells you to do as per Unam Sanctum.

245 posted on 11/10/2017 9:26:17 AM PST by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman; ebb tide

So, by that reasoning, all the popes in history who weren’t elected by unanimous votes on first ballot were essentially antipopes?

***

Including Leo X!

So once again, ebb is admitting that he’s the same as Dr. Martin Luther.


246 posted on 11/10/2017 9:26:39 AM PST by Luircin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies]

To: Luircin
I quote him now:

“RUN AWAY! RUN AWAY!”

Why do you continue to bear false witness against me? I have never said those words.

247 posted on 11/10/2017 9:27:03 AM PST by ebb tide (We have a rogue curia in Rome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 244 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

“Who do you think Catholics believe is the head of the Catholic Church? Is it Jorge Bergoglio or is it Jesus Christ?”

Hmm, I seem to recall something about the “Vicar of Christ on Earth”, acting as Christ’s representative here on earth while Christ is in heaven. Or do you reject that?


248 posted on 11/10/2017 9:29:00 AM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Luircin; Boogieman

Nope. I’m saying the Holy Ghost doesn’t elect the pope; mortal men, all of them sinners, do.


249 posted on 11/10/2017 9:29:32 AM PST by ebb tide (We have a rogue curia in Rome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 246 | View Replies]

To: ealgeone
You can't refute anything we've posted to you on this thread...or others for that matter.

It's all refuted in post #241.

Why don't you pick up your marbles and go home?

250 posted on 11/10/2017 9:31:50 AM PST by ebb tide (We have a rogue curia in Rome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide
You've refuted nothing.

You cannot refute Unam Sanctum.

You cannot refute the contradiction between what a Roman Catholic priest wrote in The Faith of Millions regarding the Eucharist and what is recorded in Hebrews.

You cannot refute that new Roman Catholics were slapped by the priest at one time but now are no longer. That's from the group that claims they never change.

You cannot refute the Canon Law that shows where you have to be subject to the bishop...including the pope.

You're banking on allegiance to a denomination and not the Savior. There is a huge difference.

251 posted on 11/10/2017 9:38:36 AM PST by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 250 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

Do me a favor and look up the definition of “vicar”.


252 posted on 11/10/2017 9:47:21 AM PST by ebb tide (We have a rogue curia in Rome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies]

To: ealgeone

Why should I refute Unam Sanctum when I accept it?

I will not play devil’s advocate.


253 posted on 11/10/2017 9:49:05 AM PST by ebb tide (We have a rogue curia in Rome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide
If you accept it you have to accept what your pope is advancing. You, nor any other Roman Catholic, have no choice in the matter....if you really believe what the Roman Catholicism teaches about following the pope.

I will not play devil’s advocate.

But you are playing a modern day Luther.

254 posted on 11/10/2017 9:52:01 AM PST by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]

To: ealgeone
If you accept it you have to accept what your pope is advancing. You, nor any other Roman Catholic, have no choice in the matter....if you really believe what the Roman Catholicism teaches about following the pope.

Once again, it's hillarious to see non-catholics telling Catholics what they "must do" in their own Church.

Why are you so infatuated with us? I have never seen you attack other "religions".

255 posted on 11/10/2017 9:56:00 AM PST by ebb tide (We have a rogue curia in Rome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide
The Pope uses the title Vicarius Christi, meaning the vicar of Christ. The papacy first used this title in the 6th century; earlier they used the title "vicar of Saint Peter" or vicarius principis apostolorum, the "vicar of the chief of the apostles".

So much for passing along what the Apostles taught.

256 posted on 11/10/2017 9:57:15 AM PST by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

St. Peter was also the Vicar of Christ, and he was rebuked to his face by another saint.


257 posted on 11/10/2017 9:58:46 AM PST by ebb tide (We have a rogue curia in Rome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide
>>If you accept it you have to accept what your pope is advancing. You, nor any other Roman Catholic, have no choice in the matter....if you really believe what the Roman Catholicism teaches about following the pope.<<

Once again, it's hillarious to see non-catholics telling Catholics what they "must do" in their own Church.

But not quite as hillarious as seeing a Roman Catholic try to squirm out of what he doesn't like about his pope.

Why are you so infatuated with us? I have never seen you attack other "religions".

When Hindus or Muslims start posting on FR they will be addressed accordingly. I understand at one time Mormons used to post on FR but are no longer able to do so.

Until then...as long as certain Roman Catholics feel FR is their own personal blog and it is posted in an open forum there may be corrections to what is posted.

258 posted on 11/10/2017 10:00:22 AM PST by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies]

To: ealgeone
But not quite as hillarious as seeing a Roman Catholic try to squirm out of what he doesn't like about his pope.

I'm not squirming out of an anything. As a faithful Catholic, I make explicitly clear what my problems are with Jorge Bergoglio.

If I praise him, you condemn both me and him.

If I criticize him, you call me a heretic like Luther.

What's your problem? Take a stand for once.

259 posted on 11/10/2017 10:08:49 AM PST by ebb tide (We have a rogue curia in Rome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies]

To: ealgeone
But you are playing a modern day Luther.

Is that a compliment or an insult?

260 posted on 11/10/2017 10:10:42 AM PST by ebb tide (We have a rogue curia in Rome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 381-393 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson