1) You said: “But you are justifying rather than condemning burning people at the stake for disagreeing with your theology.”
THAT WAS FALSE. You refuse to deal with the fact that it was false. You refuse to repent of your false witness. All you do is make excuses instead. Sophistry will not help you.
2) Tyndale’s belief in psychopannychism means he was a heretic. You refuse to deal with that fact as well. Tyndale was executed for heresy. That’s what he was charged with - heresy. That’s what he was convicted of. That’s what he was guilty of. You make excuses rather than deal with the reality of what actually happened. Tyndale’s belief in psychopannychism means he was a heretic. Case closed.
3) The rest of your posts are just long-winded attempts to excuse heresy, deny reality and history, and attack Catholics and the Catholic Church. None of that undoes your false witness. None of that changes the fact that Tyndale was a heretic.
Everything I said in this thread is true: Tyndale was executed for heresy and was in fact a heretic according to what even most Protestants think. This fact apparently forces you to resort to saying “You feign worry over a Protestant having an erroneous view of some minuscule religious matter...” as if the soul were a minuscule matter.
Remember: “Thou shalt bere no false witnesse agest thy neghboure.” That’s how Tyndale translated it, but you apparently don’t practice it.
I’ll just keep posting the same irrefutable facts. What you post is of no relevance whatsoever.
1) Wrong. You are justifying rather than condemning burning people at the stake. And you are still doing it.
2) Tyndale was martyred for translating the Bible. You justify killing him for heresy.
“Case closed.”
Not until judgment day.
3) You defend the actions of Catholic clergymen against Tyndale rather than condemning them.
“as if the soul were a minuscule matter.”
The soul is not saved by affirming some list of religious tenets as if they were an incantation. You exchange the Gospel of Christ for a manmade religion. The real tradition of the Church and the doctrine and example of Christ are exemplified by the life of William Tyndale who sacrificed everything to spread the word of God.
The nature of false religion is illustrated in the Bible by people such as Cain, Nimrod, Jannes and Jambres, Balaam, Jezebel and Ahab, the Herodians, the Saducees, the Pharisees, and the idol-making metal workers during the acts of the apostles. All these persecuted the true worshippers of God. And so did the religious clergymen who killed men like Wycliffe and Tyndale.
Matthew 15:9
In vain they worship Me,
Teaching as doctrines the commandments of men.
It is NOT bearing false witness to post the obvious and logical conclusion of your words. That conclusion is true. And you have provided zero evidence otherwise.
The evidence is clear and unassailable:
1) You have repeatedly called Tyndale a heretic.
2) You have repeatedly stated that it was for this heresy he was executed.
3) You have refused to denounce his execution as wrong.
You have supported the morality and legality of his execution by claiming that Tyndale’s execution for heresy is merely a historical fact (though you do not say the same about Joan of Arc), that his execution was legal (and you refuse to call it murder), and that the Bible supports killing people for false religious practices (it was in this exact context that you quoted the Bible about putting to death idolaters in the Old Testament).
It is the inescapable conclusion of any sane and rational mind that you justify the killing of people for disagreeing with your religious tenets. You have yet to provide a solitary shred of evidence to support otherwise. You have failed to demonstrate ANY means by which a person can argue the positions you have and still not hold the opinions which are logically derived from those positions.
You do not condemn Tyndale’s murder because you essentially argued that it was not murder and was a justifiable execution. You have posted the same defense of these heinous acts as the NAZI guards in Nuremberg: it was legal, we were just following the law.
You are hiding a murder weapon under your religious cloak. The bulge is showing. You angrily deny that it is there, claiming I am “bearing false witness” against you. But when asked to expose it to the light you refuse. Your charge of bearing false witness would not hold up in any court of law, nor will it hold up in the Heavenly courts of God, the righteous judge. And though I can not see the weapon you are hiding with my eyes, God can and does. I can not see your heart, but God does.
You will not be able to hide your murderous weapon of the religion of Cain when you appear before God. There will be no religious cloak to hide it. In His court, your will be disarmed, and your secrets exposed.
For now, you can continue to hide your secrets for whatever reason you’ve decided to do so. You have neither answered the questions I’ve asked nor given even the slightest defense or explanation as to WHY you stubbornly refuse to answer them.
I remain confident of the reason. You have some dark and sinister views which you wish to hide from scrutiny. You do hold views which justify the torture and killing of those who disagree with your religion.
Feel free to clear your name and prove me wrong as I have repeatedly given you the opportunity to do.
Again, you failed to answer my question of whether Joan of Arc was executed for heresy.
Again, you failed to answer whether you would condemn the actions of those who had Tyndale put to death.
Condemn the murder of Tyndale. Or state that Joan of Arc was “executed for heresy” historically as you claimed about Tyndale. Or give some explanation or defense as to why you can not do either of these two things. Otherwise, you are just a broken record protesting my conclusions and name calling to distract from your own abominable views.