Article image.
Posted on 06/09/2017 11:01:38 AM PDT by fishtank
June 8, 2017 | David F. Coppedge
Stop the Presses! Human Evolution Falsified!
Human bones found in Morocco undermine almost everything that has been taught about human evolution since Darwin. But is that news? Happens every year, doesn’t it?
This news is so hot, we have to get the word out now and wait for a fuller analysis later. Evolutionary paleoanthropology is in big trouble, if a new find in Morocco is as important as the news are making it out to be. Announced in Nature this week, the discoverers are dating bones from five individuals at over 300,000 Darwin Years old – over 100,000 years older than when they thought modern humans first began to emerge. And it was found in northern Africa – not at Olduvai Gorge or in some South African cave where most of the attention has been focused. Added to that, the discoverers found stone tools and chemical evidence of cooking, and are saying these people probably lived all over Africa at the same time!
(Excerpt) Read more at crev.info ...
Article image.
Curious how you’re saying that evidence of humanity being around for at least 300,000 years ‘proves’ that evolution is wrong but wait a moment:
Does that mean you’re no longer going to post articles that insist the earth is only 6,000 years old?
I mean if you’ve accepted that the earth is at least 300,000 years old then it’s not 6,000 years old, right?
Bookmark
True science is not a friend of Darwinism. Darwinism is one of the great lies of the modern era.
There were three human species sharing the planet at the same time. How does that effect evolution? All fossil records are incomplete due to the fact that fossils do not form easily. Anyhow doesn’t 300,000 years kind of mess with the six thousand year limit.
crevo bkmk
This doesn’t falsify evolution. If anything, it extends its reach. But I won’t try to show you the errors of creationism because I know it’s not possible to reason someone out of something they weren’t reasoned into.
Just one thought, though. Isn’t it odd that we can see the results of the scientific method in the civilization we have created with it, but when that same method bumps up against the tribal beliefs of some Bronze Age desert dwellers, the scientific method is completely fallacious?
“I mean if you’ve accepted that the earth is at least 300,000 years old then it’s not 6,000 years old, right?”
The order of evolution is the point. If it can be shown that the whole purported evolutionary-tree lineage makes no sense, than neither does the theory.
Much of the theories on dating time, are based on evolutionary assumptions—layers of fossils and such, NOT on (supposedly) rock solid radio-carbon dating of the strata.
Young earth creationists insist that the earth was made—like a full size tree—with an appearance of age, and that the vast sedimentary rocks with fossils in them we see nearly everywhere were made in the great flood—also giving an appearance of age—which was really an unimaginable catastrophe.
One would expect to find homo sapiens bones then, as old as the oldest fossils, if you looked in the right places—and the supposed ancestor primates to homo sapiens—to actually be contemporary species. As to the real actual age of things, that’s a separate issue.
Can't have heretical ideas such as that being proffered. All politically incorrect theories about the origins of man must be suppressed.
It is certainly not possible to reason oneself into belief in the absurdity of evolution. The amount of faith and belief in magic required to fall for the evolution narrative far surpasses the faith necessary to accept Creation by an omnipotent God.
The post-flood world is around 6,000 years old.
The pre-flood world is obviously much older. This is why dating anything beyond 6,000 years is almost impossible.
The order of evolution is not a fixed matter of dogmatic belief. It changes as new information is obtained and that’s nothing new. This is new information and the understanding of evolution will change with it.
Carbon dating had nothing to do with this as it’s not very useful in dating anything older than ~40,000 years. Trying to call carbon dating ‘rock solid’ in regards to ancient strata is either an act of ignorance or deception.
“Young earth creationists insist that the earth was made...with an appearance of age”
Why would God engage in such a deception? Why would anyone indirectly accuse God of being a deceiver who’d do such a thing?
True science has verified everything about evolution that Darwin proposed.
He predicted there would be transitional fossils, and they were found, within his lifetime, even.
Creation “science” has verified nothing, proposed nothing, and solved nothing, except lining the pockets of the Ken Ham types.
Funny how the 6000 year old earth can be stretched to 300,000 if it suits the needs of an apologist.
“There were three human species sharing the planet at the same time.”
Possibly more.
Since when (I really don't track on these things) does FR condone NOT waiting for fuller analysis on such an important topic. Evolution is a complex subject.
It was inevitable. The anti-evolutionists are as divorced from reality as the anti-Trumpers.
The human species is apparently older than 200,000. At least 100,000 years older apparently. But the remains of these “modern” Homo Sapiens clearly bear primitive traits and are not as refined as contemporary humans and 300,000 is hardly a flicker in the millions of years of existence the earth has enjoyed.
But even this, the anti-evolutionists will challenge. They will try to count generations in the Bible and ignore physical and scientific facts there also. The Bible is not a science text and reducing its significance to that level is insulting. Its not a history book, although it contains history. Its a book about God, written by God through men, and His relationship to man, the failure of mankind to live up to His expectations, the promise of a Savior and redemption. Far more important than how bodies of animals developed, in my opinion.
These people can be given some degree of tolerance as there are some evolutionists who are atheists and claim evolution proves the Bible wrong and ergo there is no God.
But the anti-evolutionists PERSIST in giving their atheist enemies ammunition by denying scientific fact and rejecting the body of evidence that indicates PHYSICAL evolution is a reality.
Evolution can indeed explain the development of the human BODY. But SOULS don’t fossilize. At some point in the development of the hominid line, God imparted an immortal HUMAN soul to the bodies he created.
And THAT needs to be a rational defense of creation and God. But in order to do this, you have to acknowledge the OBVIOUS. The physical BODIES of organisms DO evolve over time.
I always wondered with the creationists? If you’re right then why is god trying to fool us? And if god did indeed set the fossil record as it is all at once, what’s makes you think YOU can suss him out?
PS I’m an atheist, I find this whole argument most interesting. I’ve studied evolutionary bio and find the theory of evolution simply as the best we know that fits the evidence. Like gravity, there could be a graviton out there that changes our theory but we can only make decisions based on the best evidence we have.
http://anthro.palomar.edu/evolve/evolve_2.htm
An interesting article on Darwin and his God given curiosity about this wondrous earth and inhabitants. God gave us the gifts of observation, inquiry, preservation and science.
IMHO Darwin did not attempt to destroy belief, he added to it.
This works either in showing the fallacy of dating or the fallacy of human population growth rate in the religion of Evolution.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.