Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: ealgeone
I don't suppose that the authors, as evangelicals, would mind posting the entire reply, instead of only the excerpt:

Question: "What is the doctrine of the sufficiency of Scripture? What does it mean that the Bible is sufficient?"

Answer: The doctrine of the sufficiency of Scripture is a fundamental tenet of the Christian faith. To say the Scriptures are sufficient means that the Bible is all we need to equip us for a life of faith and service. It provides a clear demonstration of God’s intention to restore the broken relationship between Himself and humanity through His Son, Jesus Christ, our Savior through the gift of faith. No other writings are necessary for this good news to be understood, nor are any other writings required to equip us for a life of faith.

When discussing Scripture, Christians are referring to both Old and New Testaments. The apostle Paul declared that the holy Scriptures “are able to make you wise for salvation through faith in Christ Jesus. All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness, so that the man of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good work” (2 Timothy 3:15–17). If Scripture is “God-breathed,” then it is not man-breathed, and, although it was penned by men, those “men spoke from God as they were carried along by the Holy Spirit” (2 Peter 1:21). No man-made writing is sufficient to equip us for every good work; only the Word of God can do that. Furthermore, if the Scriptures are sufficient to thoroughly equip us, then nothing more is needed.

Colossians 2 deals with the dangers a church faces when the sufficiency of Scripture is challenged and merged with non-biblical writings, full of ungodly theology and concepts. Paul warned the church at Colosse: “See to it that no one takes you captive through hollow and deceptive philosophy, which depends on human tradition and the basic principles of this world rather than on Christ” (Colossians 2:8). Jude says it even more specifically when he writes, “Although I was very eager to write to you about the salvation we share, I felt I had to write and urge you to contend for the faith that was once for all entrusted to the saints” (Jude 1:3).

Notice the phrase “once and for all.” This makes it clear that no other writings, no matter how godly the pastor, theologian, or denominational church they may come from, are to be seen as equal to or completing the Word of God. The Bible is all that is necessary for the believer to understand the character of God, the nature of man, and the doctrines of sin, heaven, hell, and salvation through Jesus Christ. Paul’s words to the Galatians indicate the seriousness of delivering a message outside the Bible: “If we or an angel from heaven should preach a gospel other than the one we preached to you, let him be eternally condemned!” (Galatians 1:8).

Perhaps the strongest verses on the issue of the sufficiency of the Bible come from the book of Psalms. In Psalm 19:7–14, David rejoices in God’s Word, declaring it to be perfect, trustworthy, right, radiant, enlightening, sure and altogether righteous.

The sufficiency of Scripture is under attack today, and, sadly, that attack comes far too often in our own churches. Management techniques, worldly methods of drawing crowds, entertainment, extra-biblical revelations, mysticism, and some forms of psychological counseling all declare that the Bible and its precepts are not adequate for the Christian life. But Jesus said, “My sheep hear my voice and I know them and they follow me” (John 10:27). His voice is all we need to hear and the Scriptures are His voice, completely and utterly sufficient.


4 posted on 05/27/2017 10:04:15 AM PDT by Jack Black (Dispossession is an obliteration of memory, of place, and of identity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Jack Black

No problem with posting the whole article...hence that’s why the link is provided.


5 posted on 05/27/2017 10:09:57 AM PDT by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Jack Black

Unless you can show me an Biblically based, inspired, “table of contents” your argument turns to dust.


15 posted on 05/27/2017 11:43:54 AM PDT by papertyger (The semantics define how we think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Jack Black

Amen


99 posted on 05/27/2017 3:40:02 PM PDT by Mom MD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Jack Black
Notice the phrase “once and for all.”

I notice it is not there in Jude for the Authorized Version

ἅπαξ = hapax = once

There are fourteen occurrences of that Greek word in the scriptures, and unless I missed one, none of them are translated "once for all" in the KJV. Instead, there is another word off the same root which once, with KJV brackets is translated "once [for all]"
ἐφάπαξ = ephapax: which is "once [for all]" only once out of four occurrences.

Hebrews 10:10 Adv
GRK: Ἰησοῦ Χριστοῦ ἐφάπαξ
NAS: of Jesus Christ once for all.
KJV: of Jesus Christ once [for all].
INT: of Jesus Christ once for all

    If you substitute "once for all" for "once" in the following passage's modern English translation, and use that particular English translation to try to establish the assertion of the thread, then you have to explain
  1. how the Authorized Version for Protestants had the wrong translation on such an important topic for over four hundred years,
  2. how the faith was delivered "once for all" at the time Jude was written when perhaps five other books had not been written yet (John, 1 John, 2 John, 3 John, and Revelation).


Beloved, when I gave all diligence to write unto you of the common salvation, it was needful for me to write unto you, and exhort you that ye should earnestly contend for the faith which was once delivered unto the saints.

Jude, Catholic chapter one, Protestant verse three,
as authorized, but not authored, by King James

106 posted on 05/27/2017 4:06:08 PM PDT by af_vet_1981 (The bus came by and I got on, That's when it all began.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Jack Black

And Jesus & Paul’s Bible consisted of Moses, the Prophets, and the Psalms and them alone. The New Testament did not exist!


235 posted on 05/28/2017 11:38:10 AM PDT by patlin ("Knowledgee chosen to participate inthat is - 2nd to none but God" ConstitutionallySpeaking 2011)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson