“You are addressing that tagline insult to ealgeone as much as you are to everyone else.”
It’s not directed to everyone and I don’t mind if everyone takes it as directed to them.
>>>Yes, it is directed at everyone. That’s the point of you making it your tag line. It’s probably directed much more at some people - such as Protestants like ealgeone and myself - than at others, such as other Catholics, but it is most certainly directed at everyone who happens to read it, and you admit as much by saying you don’t mind if everyone takes it as directed at them.
“And ealgeone is correctly saying that you attempted to justify it through Scripture but haven’t done so.”
No, actually he is in error. I made no attempt. There was only accomplishment.
>>>No, you’re in error. You’re only trying to use Scripture to justify insulting people but that doesn’t work.
“What’s more, you’ve not only made your tagline a personal attack on everyone who reads it,”
That’s false.
>>>No, that’s true, as discussed above.
“but you’re breaking the rules by calling an individual poster an “anti-Catholic.””
If there is a rule against calling an anti-Catholic an anti-Catholic, then I have, in fact, violated it without intentionally doing so. Feel free to alert the religion forum moderator.
>>>There is a rule against calling an individual an “anti-Catholic,” (among other “antis”) and I linked to the page that mentions it so you don’t have an excuse for having done it again, except that apparently you didn’t care to check the rule or care about breaking it.
“Yes, it is directed at everyone.”
No. I wrote it so I know exactly who it is and is not directed toward. For you to say otherwise only makes you look ridiculous for you neither write nor ever saw it probably until the last day or two.
“That’s the point of you making it your tag line.”
Again, no.
“It’s probably directed much more at some people - such as Protestants like ealgeone and myself - than at others, such as other Catholics, but it is most certainly directed at everyone who happens to read it, and you admit as much by saying you don’t mind if everyone takes it as directed at them.”
No, again, it is not directed at everyone. You will be wrong every time you say that.
“No, you’re in error. You’re only trying to use Scripture to justify insulting people but that doesn’t work.”
No, I never tried to use Scripture. I used Scripture. Perhaps Yoda can help you with this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h5SNAluOj6U Learning from a Muppet may be more your speed.
“No, that’s true, as discussed above.”
No, it’s false, but the truth won’t stop you from repeating a falsehood multiple times apparently.
“There is a rule against calling an individual an “anti-Catholic,” (among other “antis”) and I linked to the page that mentions it so you don’t have an excuse for having done it again, except that apparently you didn’t care to check the rule or care about breaking it.”
But I violated that rule and most assuredly will do so in the future if I deem it appropriate in regard to telling the truth. I will tell the truth and properly call someone what is fitting. I need no “excuse”. An anti-Catholic should be called an anti-Catholic. If it is the truth, it is the truth and no rule will impede me from stating the truth here or anywhere else.