“At least one MS copy of the original Hebrew Matthew is known to exist at the Vatican.”
Nope. 1) If there were a Hebrew copy of the “original Hebrew Matthew” one would need to have either an explicit statement in the text saying so or the actual original to know that. 2) What the Vatican has in regard to Hebrew manuscripts of the Gospels is universally known to NOT BE ANCIENT enough to be a copy of any Hebrew original: http://cbcat.abcat.cat/pdf/CasanellasP-HamesH_HebrewGospelsTranslatedFromCatalan.pdf
“Many others are found in Europe, and two are at the Hebrew University.”
No, actually none have been found. There is no proof in mss. form of a copy of a Hebrew original that is ancient. NONE.
“Stomp your little feet, plug your ears, and go LA, LA, LA, LA, LA, all you wish.”
I’m not doing any of that. I’m simply relying on the known evidence. Again, read the article I linked to. I have evidence. You have nothing. You’re the one stomping your little feet, plugging your ears, and generally just getting things wrong as usual.
A worthy plan of action.
Hold this thought.