Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Rapture – Indisputable Christian Heresy
Preachers Institute ^ | 04-10-2010 | Fr. Anthony M. Coniaris

Posted on 07/27/2016 8:46:41 PM PDT by NRx

By Fr. Anthony M. Coniaris

In this brief article, Fr. Anthony expresses with clarity the truth of the false teaching known as the “Rapture” and how much it distorts the teachings of the Lord in the Holy Scriptures.

As I was driving one day I encountered a bumper sticker admonishing me:

“WARNING! In the event of Rapture, this car will be driverless.”

The strange belief in the Rapture teaches that some day (sooner rather than later), without warning, born-again Christians will begin to float up from the freeway, abandoned vehicles careening wildly. There will be airliners in the sky suddenly with no one at the controls! Presumably, God is removing these favored ones from earth to spare them the tribulation of the Anti-Christ which the rest of us will have to endure.

Unfortunately the Rapture has been promoted widely by the Left Behind series of books that have sold over 70 million copies.

The Rapture represents a radical misinterpretation of Scripture. I remember watching “Sixty Minutes”a year ago and was appalled to hear the announcer say that “the Rapture is an unmistakenly Christian doctrine”. It is not!

It is a serious distortion of Scripture.

It is astonishing that a belief so contrary to Scripture and the tradition of the Church could be propagated by so-called “Christians”.

According to the Bible and according to the belief not only of Orthodox Christians but also of the Roman Catholic and most Protestant mainline churches, the true Rapture will not be secret; it will be the great and very visible Second Coming of Jesus at the end of the world. That is the one and only “Rapture”. It will not be a separate, secret event but one that every eye shall see (1 Thess. 4:16-17).

The word rapture is not found in Scripture but hearkens to 1 Thess. 4:17 where St. Paul says that when the Lord comes again

“we who are alive…shall be caught up…in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air.”

This “being caught up…in the clouds”—arpagisometha in Greek, is translated by some as “raptured”. The word itself is not found in Orthodox theology.

The notion of a rapture in which Christ comes unseen to take believers away secretly, and only later comes back again for everyone else publicly—this whole teaching is quite novel. It was almost unheard of until John Nelson Darby formulated it in the 1800s as part of a new approach to the Bible, sometimes called “dispensationalism”.

The purpose of the “Rapture” is to protect the elect from the tribulations of the end times. Yet Jesus said nothing about sparing anyone from tribulation. In fact, He said,

“In the world you have tribulation, but be of good cheer. I have overcome the world.”

Nowhere did Jesus ever say that He would return secretly to rapture the elect. Rather, He promised to be with His elect in all tribulations.

“Lo, I am with you always. I will never leave you or forsake you.”

He even had something good to say about being persecuted:

“Blessed are those who are persecuted for righteousness’ sake, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven” (Matt. 5:10).

Those who espouse the Rapture claim that Matthew 24:40-41 refers clearly to the rapture of the just,

“Then shall two be in the field; the one shall be taken, and the other left. Two women shall be grinding at the mill; the one shall be taken, and the other left.”

The entire passage, however, refers to Christ’s second coming where He will judge the living and the dead and separate the just from the unjust.

Darby taught as dogma that when the Scriptures reveal that the Lord will reign on earth for a thousand years (Rev. 20:4), this figure is to be taken literally, rather than as a symbol for eternity as we believe. The Council of Ephesus in A.D. 431 condemned as heresy this teaching which is called chialiasmos (millenianism or 1000 years).

In fact, the Seven Ecumenical Councils (325-787 A.D.) in which the essential truths of the Christian faith were defined never mention a rapture. Yet evangelical Christians and Pentecostals keep using obscure passages of the book of Revelation which purport to give a detailed timetable of what will happen at the end of the world, despite the fact that Jesus Himself warned that no man knows either the day or the hour when the Son of Man shall return.

A major problem with the Rapture is that it ends up teaching not two but three comings of Jesus—first His birth in Bethlehem; second, His secret coming to snatch away (rapture) the “born-again”; and third, His coming at the end of the world to judge the living and the dead and to reign in glory. Yet only two not three comings of Christ are mentioned in the Bible. We have the clearest definition of this in the Nicene Creed when we confess that

“the Lord Jesus Christ…will come again in glory to judge the living and the dead. His Kingdom will have no end…. I expect the resurrection of the dead. And the life of the ages to come.”

There is no mention of a “Rapture”.

As already stated, most Christians, Orthodox, Roman Catholics and Protestants do not believe in the Rapture. In fact, one Protestant pastor, John L. Bray, summarized magnificently what we Orthodox and most other Christians believe about the Rapture when he wrote these remarkable words,

Though many believe and teach this “Pre-Tribulation Rapture” theory, they erroneously do so, because neither Jesus, Paul, Peter, John, nor any of the other writers of the Bible taught this. Nor did the early church fathers, nor any others for many hundreds of years…. Did you know that NONE of this was ever taught prior to 1812, and that all forms of Pre-Tribulation Rapture teaching were developed since that date? …. If I were to preach something, or believe something, supposedly from the Bible, but cannot find that ANYONE ELSE before 1812 ever believed it or taught it, I would seriously question that it is based on the Bible.

Thus the Rapture is foreign to the Bible and to the living tradition of the Church. It is what we call a heresy, a false teaching. False teachings, such as this, happen when people—like John Darby—believe that they have the right to interpret the Scriptures individually apart from the Living Body of Christ—the Church—where the Spirit of Truth abides and leads us to all truth.

I can think of no better words to conclude than those of Jesus when He speaks of the one and only “Rapture”, the Second Coming:

“Be on guard. Be alert! You do not know when that time will come…keep watch…if he comes suddenly, do not let Him find you sleeping. What I say to you, I say to everyone: Watch!” (Mark 13:32-37).



TOPICS: Apologetics; Orthodox Christian; Theology
KEYWORDS: endtimes; posttrib; pretrib; prophecy; rapture
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 481-500501-520521-540 ... 861-865 next last
To: editor-surveyor

Just what I believe! Yeshua is come in the flesh! So we can agree on something! So other than differing issues over belief and practice...the spirit of Antichrist is not an issue here!(1 John 4)


501 posted on 08/03/2016 5:43:29 PM PDT by mdmathis6 (BEWARE THE ABORTION POLITICAL INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 500 | View Replies]

To: mdmathis6

.
Do you believe this:

>> “Cursed be he that confirms not all the words of this law to do them. And all the people shall say, Amen?” <<

So many post it without taking stock of what it declares about themselves if they confirm not all of the Torah.

Who can accept that curse? Yet if you confirm it not, that is where you stand.

One cannot believe in Messiach without making the same confirmation thereof that he did. That is exactly what John is saying in his first epistle.
.


502 posted on 08/03/2016 8:39:24 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 501 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

The Apostles kept saying it.


503 posted on 08/03/2016 8:46:24 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 492 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
All that is applicable under present circumstances.

So; you are NOT doing ALL that TORAH requires.

I see...

But WHO decides what is applicable?

504 posted on 08/04/2016 3:48:22 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 497 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
“Going up” to the temple is no longer possible, but the temple will be replaced by Yeshua when we return with him after the wedding feast.

Oh?

For what purpose?


John 4:21
Jesus said to her, “Woman, believe me, the hour is coming when neither on this mountain nor in Jerusalem will you worship the Father...

505 posted on 08/04/2016 3:51:34 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 497 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
The Temple conditions are no longer applicable...

But it's going to be replaced.

HMMMmmm...

506 posted on 08/04/2016 3:52:59 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 497 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

Was your answer a YES or a NO?


507 posted on 08/04/2016 3:54:23 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 502 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
The Apostles kept saying it./I>

You keep typing this.

508 posted on 08/04/2016 3:55:01 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 503 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

.
>> “For what purpose?” <<

For all the nations of the Earth that will be “going up” to Jerusalem for his feasts.

Those that “go not up” will have their skies shut up.

Yeshua’s prophecy in John 4 was fulfilled.

His prophecies in the Revelation will also be fulfilled.
.


509 posted on 08/04/2016 9:01:40 AM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 505 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

My answer to what?


510 posted on 08/04/2016 9:03:25 AM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 507 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

.
I am doing all that Torah requires of me.

That is the effective operation of Yehova’s grace, to write his Torah on our hearts that we may find the righteousness he requires of us.

That is the “Garment” that was required to enter the feast in the parable.
.


511 posted on 08/04/2016 9:08:54 AM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 504 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
I am doing all that Torah requires of me.

I want to be safe.

Will you please list all of the requirements for me?

I sure want to DO all the correct things.

512 posted on 08/04/2016 11:17:28 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 511 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

How serpentine of you!

I’ll let you read for your self in Leviticus.


513 posted on 08/04/2016 12:41:57 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 512 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
I’ll let you read for your self in Leviticus.

Sorry; but YOU said that some were no longer valid.

I need the CORRECT list; if you please.

514 posted on 08/04/2016 3:17:18 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 513 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

.
Valid???

Temple requirements were always valid, but without a temple there is nothing with which to comply.

One cannot go to a temple that is not there.

But then this stuff is strictly for those that believe in Yeshua, so perhaps its not for you?
.


515 posted on 08/04/2016 5:26:02 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 514 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
Temple requirements were always valid, but without a temple there is nothing with which to comply.

What is the EXCUSE for NOT having a temple NOW?

516 posted on 08/05/2016 6:55:00 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 515 | View Replies]

To: metmom
And you’re not?

No, I'm not. I do ignore the wrong interpretations made by modern prophetless churches. Your interpretation does NOT equal God's words.

Being born of water represents the physical birth.

That's ridiculous. Born of the water represents baptism. Reborn through baptism by immersion and baptism by fire through the Holy Ghost.

Jesus Himself showed this, immersed in water to fulfill all righteousness. Because He had too, it's a commandment of God. Then the Holy Ghost came to Him.

Your words make no sense. You have to be born on the earth in order to get to heaven is what you're saying. Just no sense at all.

It's just insane the way you twist these things to prop up your house of cards. You have to find away around the requirement of baptism because that means there's a requirement on your part to gain salvation. You can't accept that because then all your theories go down the tubes... so in to the spin cycle it goes and out comes... "Being born of water represents the physical birth"....

If that's what if means, why would Jesus even bother saying it in the first place...???!!!


517 posted on 08/07/2016 10:20:11 AM PDT by StormPrepper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: Mark17
You don't know the story of the thief bro. Matthew 27:44. Both initially mocked him. Later, one changed his mind.

He just happened to change his mind? Really? I also know how stories get told. And how people view events. No one goes from mocking to humble repentance in 1 second. I view this in the same light as the three accounts of Saul on the road to Damascus. Three different accounts of the same event, two are wrong, but it was just an observation someone was making.

In reality I doubt if they were both actually mocking Jesus because one thief stopped the other from doing it. It was just an observation from those near by. Pretty much a nit pick by those on this thread trying to prop up a weak argument.


518 posted on 08/07/2016 10:27:56 AM PDT by StormPrepper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies]

To: Radix
The Dispensation of Grace had not yet been fully (or even partially) instituted when the Thief on the Cross was granted his forgiveness.

The Lord has forgiven people of sin down through the ages long before this event on the promise of the coming atonement.

I'm not really sure what "The Dispensation of Grace" is, but the Lord can forgive at the time of choosing. If not neither Job nor Abraham could have been judged to be perfect in their life times.

Or forgiven the entire city of Nineveh. This was the whole idea behind the commandment of blood sacrifice, so people could gain forgiveness in their life times and not have to wait in death for the atonement of Christ to be complete.


519 posted on 08/07/2016 10:38:26 AM PDT by StormPrepper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: castlegreyskull
If someone violated one of the ten commandments, they will go to Hell? For instance, they do not observe the Sabbath (saturday or Sunday?). What if they Lied? I think the Christians I know avoid violating the commandments. When they do slip and all of us will, I thought Jesus forgives?

There are many more commandments than just the 10. The 10 were a subset of all the commandments of God. They had a specific function and were tailored for the Hebrews coming out of Egypt. God was starting them down a path back to Him after they had lived in idolatry for 400 years. In other words, He started them out with something simple that they could follow.

Jesus reinstated the full law.

Jesus does forgive if His criteria is met. The Lord has always required, first believe, then go and do.
520 posted on 08/07/2016 10:47:47 AM PDT by StormPrepper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 481-500501-520521-540 ... 861-865 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson