If that was a “sin”, I thought Christ died for our sins on the cross as atonement and propitiation for our sins? Please explain.
Very disturbing. Surely a handful of bishops/cardinals can not defy Christ Jesus’ teaching and that of the Church who delivers it in His Word. Surely they can not wriggle and squirm under a damp stone and succeed in calling it “practicums” and not changes to Dogma. Ridiculous.
They flatter Satan and it can not stand.
So Henry VIII was right after all. And all the English martyrs died for nothing. Looks like another generation is going to have to fight for what remains of orthodoxy.
The Catholic Church has been infested with heretics, homosexuals and outright Communists since Vatican II. It is the religious counterpart of the GOPe.
If the Church loosens the bonds of marriage, won’t that loosen all sins committed against the Commandment “Thou shall not commit adultery”?
My sister is married to a divorced Catholic. They both go to church and he takes communion. He’s even on the Parish council, helping the pastor with the books. I don’t think all that annulment business is really necessary. He didn’t bother with it and he’s just fine.
Let’s just toss the words of St John Paul II, not to mention Christ and St. Paul, out the window.
“Therapeutic energy”?
I give up.
“savor the delicacies of God love”?
“releasing the therapeutic energy”?
Beware of bishops who communicate by means of flowery psycho-babble.
....And another month before the Pope comes to America!
I have a quick question.
If there was a “defect in ritual form”, is there still a need to get an annulment? Thank-you for your response and God Bless.