I color-coded the paragraphs as to their degree of magisterial authority, as far as I could tell from the usual criteria, and as far as I could determine, more than half of it was strictly non-Magisterial: which is to say, it dealt with topics which are outside of the competence of the Magisterium, e.g. geophysics, climatology, chemistry, biology, sociology, urban planning, economics, diplomacy and politics.
The thingy about all the animals being in heaven is dicey, because it does deal with a faith-and-morals question, i.e. our eternal destiny. However, this is not handled in the manner of a definition of doctrine, but rather as a kind of musing. I would call it a "the·o·lo·gou·me·non" (there, my biggest word of the day) which means, a personal theological opinion.
That about right, campion?
In any case, there was nothing in there about not being allowed to eat animal products.
So. Peacefully and in good conscience, back to my bacon.