[A Formerly Proud Canadian]

After all the various versions of the koran were colated, no it has not changed. The process of colating it was however, a bloody event, per Nabeel Qureshi. In chapter 42 of his book Seeking Allah, Finding Jesus, he details this in his research of volume 6 of Sahih Bukhari. Book 61 of this tome details the process of the koran's collection. Unlike the Bible, whose 66 books were peaceably validated centuries before the First Council of Nicea, Sahih Bukhari details the various disagreements between various early 'witnesses' to mo's dictating the koran, as dictated to him by a demon. Included in this work, is details of bloodshed between disagreeing moslem groups. So yes, that manuscript is likely authentic, insofar as it matches today's koran, but as far as 'matching' what the demon told mo? Not a chance!

[vladimir998]

“Unlike the Bible, whose 66 books were peaceably validated centuries before the First Council of Nicea,”

By whom?

When?

Where?

And where did you get the number 66?