Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Catholic Apologetics: Non-Catholics in the Communion Line
Catholic Answers ^ | April 15, 2015 | Michelle Arnold

Posted on 04/15/2015 1:38:52 PM PDT by NYer

There are usually a few Masses per year at which there can be expected to be a large number of non-Catholics present. Christmas and Easter Masses are popular with non-Catholics, mainly because they are visiting Catholic family and friends. Nuptial Masses, especially when one of the parties to be married is a non-Catholic Christian, will have large turnouts of non-Catholics (sometimes up to half the congregation). Non-Catholics can also be expected at Masses offered for other sacramental firsts and life-cycle events, such as confirmations and funerals.

This reality raises a common question for the apologists here at Catholic Answers: What should happen at Communion time? Here's a recent question I received on the issue.

At my granddaughter's First Communion, the priest announced that if there were any Episcopalians present they could receive Communion because they believe in the Real Presence. Other Protestants could come forward for a blessing. When did the teaching change on receiving Communion? I thought you had to be in full union with Rome. My son-in-law is Protestant and this caused real confusion for us.

In this case, both the priest and the inquirer were mistaken, to some extent, in their respective understandings of the Church's sacramental discipline.

The priest was incorrect that Episcopalians ordinarily may receive Communion at a Catholic Mass. Since Episcopalians do not have valid holy orders, they do not have a valid Communion. The fact that they believe that Jesus is in some way present in the Eucharist does not mean that they fully share Catholic faith in the nature of the Real Presence.

The inquirer also was not entirely correct that those who receive Communion must be "in full union with Rome." Orthodox Christians, and members of a few other Christian churches with valid holy orders and a valid Eucharist, are allowed to receive Communion when attending Catholic Masses. The Guidelines for the Reception of Communion state:

Members of the Orthodox churches, the Assyrian Church of the East, and the Polish National Catholic Church are urged to respect the discipline of their own churches. According to Roman Catholic discipline, the Code of Canon Law does not object to the reception of Communion by Christians of these churches (canon 844 §3).

Occasionally, under special circumstances, a baptized non-Catholic Christian may receive the Eucharist if there is grave need, the Christian "spontaneously asks" for the sacraments, and if he cannot approach his own minister:

Because Catholics believe that the celebration of the Eucharist is a sign of the reality of the oneness of faith, life, and worship, members of those churches with whom we are not yet fully united are ordinarily not admitted to holy Communion. Eucharistic sharing in exceptional circumstances by other Christians requires permission according to the directives of the diocesan bishop and the provisions of canon law (canon 844 §4) [Guidelines].

These guidelines, which are based on canon law, are rather complex and shot through with exceptions to the general principles. That can make it difficult for clergy and laity alike to offer blanket guidelines for reception of Communion when non-Catholics are present at a Catholic Mass.

And, all too often, off-the-cuff announcements made by the presider at Mass, usually right before Communion is distributed, do not accurately reflect the Church's discipline on reception of the Eucharist. It may be more common these days to hear a variant of the announcement quoted earlier, inviting "all who believe in the Real Presence of Christ in the Eucharist" to receive Communion, but the less-common announcement that "Communion is reserved to practicing Catholics in a state of grace" also is problematic.

What can be done? Here are a few suggestions for clergy and laity alike.

Learn the guidelines. I trust that clergy are fully instructed in the guidelines for reception of the sacraments while in seminary. But because the guidelines are not easily boiled down to either "Come one, come all" or "Practicing Catholics only!" then I can only suggest regular reading of the USCCB's Guidelines and the relevant section from canon law (canon 844). We have looked at the USCCB's summary; here is canon 844:

§1 Catholic ministers may lawfully administer the sacraments only to Catholic members of Christ's faithful, who equally may lawfully receive them only from Catholic ministers, except as provided in §2, 3, and 4 of this canon and in canon 861 §2.

§2 Whenever necessity requires or a genuine spiritual advantage commends it, and provided the danger of error or indifferentism is avoided, Christ's faithful for whom it is physically or morally impossible to approach a Catholic minister, may lawfully receive the sacraments of penance, the Eucharist, and anointing of the sick from non-Catholic ministers in whose churches these sacraments are valid [emphasis added].

§3 Catholic ministers may lawfully administer the sacraments of penance, the Eucharist, and anointing of the sick to members of the Eastern churches not in full communion with the Catholic Church, if they spontaneously ask for them and are properly disposed. The same applies to members of other churches which the Apostolic See judges to be in the same position as the aforesaid Eastern churches so far as the sacraments are concerned.

§4 If there is a danger of death or if, in the judgement of the diocesan bishop or of the episcopal conference, there is some other grave and pressing need, Catholic ministers may lawfully administer these same sacraments to other Christians not in full communion with the Catholic Church, who cannot approach a minister of their own community and who spontaneously ask for them, provided that they demonstrate the Catholic faith in respect of these sacraments and are properly disposed [emphasis added].

§5 In respect of the cases dealt with in §2, 3, and 4, the diocesan bishop or the episcopal conference is not to issue general norms except after consultation with the competent authority, at least at the local level, of the non-Catholic church or community concerned.

Given the importance of access to the sacraments by all those duly permitted and properly disposed to receive them, Catholic and non-Catholic alike, I do not think it is unreasonable to recommend that priests and deacons memorize this canon and the USCCB's Guidelines. Or, if memorization is impossible, clergy can print out both the canon and the Guidelines on the front and back of a laminated card and keep it on their person at all times, as police officers do with The Miranda Warning.

Publish the guidelines. The missalettes used in many American Catholic parishes often print the USCCB's Guidelines, usually on the inside front cover. If a parish uses a missalette that has the USCCB's Guidelines available, great. If not, then contact the USCCB and request permission to reprint the Guidelines onto card stock to create a sturdy insert that can be placed inside all of the parish's missalettes. Extras can be placed in the parish's literature racks.

Promote the guidelines. Once a parish has determined where its copies of the Guidelines are—whether they are already printed in the parish missalettes or are printed by the parish on card stock and placed in the missalettes—the parish can create a plan of action for promoting the Guidelines at liturgies where non-Catholics are expected to be present. For example, a regular announcement before Masses offered at Christmas, Easter, and for weddings and funerals can be to direct the congregation's attention to the Guidelines and ask the congregation to read the Guidelines before the liturgy begins. For example:

Before we begin, we would like to direct your attention to the Guidelines for Reception of Communion, which can be found on the inside front-cover of the missalettes placed in the pew pockets in front of you. Please take a moment to read the Guidelines so that you may properly discern whether or not you are able to receive Communion during this liturgy. We welcome all who are unable to receive Communion to offer silent prayer or personal reflection during the Rite of Communion.

Nota bene: The announcement suggested here (my own wording, which may be revised appropriately at the discretion of clergy) is not an open call to receive Communion, nor does it make assumptions about who is properly disposed to receive. It simply directs all present to read the Church's guidelines for receiving Communion and to discern their own preparedness for reception. No assumptions are made about the personal religious convictions of those visiting, some of whom may either not be comfortable praying in common with Christians or may not even be theists (which is why the invitation to "personal reflection" is extended).

When the Church's guidelines are not heeded

Despite all of these precautions, there may be times when someone who in not properly disposed to receive Communion receives Communion anyway. It is more likely that a layperson will notice this than will a member of the clergy.

Clergy have the authority to counsel people not to receive Communion; laypersons have the authority to make the guidelines for receiving Communion known. In a previous blog post, I offered these suggestions to laity concerned about the proper reception of Communion by non-practicing Catholics or non-Catholics:

Bottom line: We must accept that human persons have free will, and may freely choose to use it either positively or negatively. We can offer information. When we have the authority to do so, we can counsel accordingly. In a few individual cases, it may be that ecclesial authorities can take more drastic steps to protect the Blessed Sacrament from unworthy reception.

But there is only so much we can do to inform, counsel, and instruct. In the end, ultimate responsibility for worthy reception of Communion belongs to the individual communicant. We can trust that God knows that communicant's mind and heart, and that he will respond to that person accordingly.

In order that this judgment [by the Lord] be favorable or rather that I be not judged at all, I want to be charitable in my thoughts toward others at all times, for Jesus has said, "Judge not, and you shall not be judged" (St. Therese of Lisieux).



TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; Religion & Culture; Worship
KEYWORDS: catholicanswers; catholicapologetics; communionline; holycommunion; michellearnold; noncatholics; wannabecatholics
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-151 next last
To: NYer

I was told years ago in Chaplain Basic Course that non-Catholics are not invited to receive the Eucharist. That was pretty straight forward. I did not find it odd. Catholics aren’t the only ones in the world who limit access to their communion to those they consider appropriate.

I was in a Catholic service this past weekend with my son, D-I-L and grandkids. Communion time came, and I didn’t go forward. It’s as simple as that.

If I visit someone’s house and they tell me please not to walk on the grass, I don’t walk on the grass. They probably have a good reason if they are otherwise friendly people.


61 posted on 04/15/2015 4:41:00 PM PDT by xzins (Donate to the Freep-a-Thon or lose your ONLY voice. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o; All
Watch and pray. I mean pray.

Absolutely!

Oh and btw, someone is making an offer on our house tomorrow, pray it's what we need it to be please. That goes for the rest of you too. :)

62 posted on 04/15/2015 4:41:04 PM PDT by Legatus (I think, therefore you're out of your mind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: ealgeone
Your thinking as to the significance of the Eucharist doesn't govern the Catholic Church's understanding of it.
63 posted on 04/15/2015 4:44:40 PM PDT by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
I have no desire to stand in a “communion line” in a Roman church...that bread is a demonic idol..

LOL!!

64 posted on 04/15/2015 4:45:55 PM PDT by johniegrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Legatus

Will do Legatus.


65 posted on 04/15/2015 4:49:03 PM PDT by piusv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

“Now if this baby-killer or sodomite is practicing this sin, or if these same persons are politicians that believe in these sins and promote these sins, THEY HAVE EXCOMMUNICATED THEMSELVES and if they present themselves for communion GOD KNOWS they are committing a mortal sin by partaking in Holy Communion.”

But didn’t the sodomites and baby-killers commit mortal sins when they killed babies and sodomitted 8in the first place? So does it really make any difference if they commit a second mortal sin by partaking in Holy Communion? And which of those mortal sins is the worst anyway, Holy Communion, or baby-killing, or sodomitting?


66 posted on 04/15/2015 5:18:56 PM PDT by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: NYer

I have a non-catholic protestant friend who is married to a catholic and he receives holy communion when he attends mass with his wife.


67 posted on 04/15/2015 6:48:31 PM PDT by Coleus (For the sake of his sorrowful passion, have mercy on us and on the whole world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Resettozero
Okay, then. I have in fact seen the word thrown as an epithet on FR Religion Forum threads and too often. Guess it's more noticeable when one is on the receiving end?

Even if the word itself doesn't appear, a lot of the posts in the Religion Forum breathe that spirit--so much so that the Religion Forum has acquired a certain reputation. Occasionally I see the protestation that the poster is simply faithfully proclaiming God's truth and it's those other people who are horrible, but I suppose if that were indeed the general case, then this reputation would be more often limited to Those Other People.

It's interesting, in a way, to think about all this in light of how one may be "in communion" with someone else.

68 posted on 04/15/2015 7:09:40 PM PDT by Lonely Bull
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Lucky
Your thinking as to the significance of the Eucharist doesn't govern the Catholic Church's understanding of it.

However it does correspond to it is viewed in the Word.

69 posted on 04/15/2015 7:15:23 PM PDT by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: metmom

DETAILS!!!

Da debble is in 'em!

70 posted on 04/15/2015 7:53:23 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: NYer

For our fellow Christians

We welcome our fellow Christians to this celebration of the Eucharist as our brothers and sisters. We pray that our common baptism and the action of the Holy Spirit in this Eucharist will draw us closer to one another and begin to dispel the sad divisions which separate us. We pray that these will lessen and finally disappear, in keeping with Christ's prayer for us "that they may all be one" (Jn 17:21).

Because Catholics believe that the celebration of the Eucharist is a sign of the reality of the oneness of faith, life, and worship, members of those churches with whom we are not yet fully united are ordinarily not admitted to Holy Communion. Eucharistic sharing in exceptional circumstances by other Christians requires permission according to the directives of the diocesan bishop and the provisions of canon law (canon 844 §4). Members of the Orthodox Churches, the Assyrian Church of the East, and the Polish National Catholic Church are urged to respect the discipline of their own Churches. According to Roman Catholic discipline, the Code of Canon Law does not object to the reception of Communion by Christians of these Churches (canon 844 §3).
 
http://www.usccb.org/prayer-and-worship/the-mass/order-of-mass/liturgy-of-the-eucharist/guidelines-for-the-reception-of-communion.cfm
 
 
 

71 posted on 04/15/2015 8:04:40 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle

Receiving the Eucharist unworthily is a grave sin. Your sister and brother in law should not receive Communion.

You are doing the right thing.

BTW, you can always come back to the Catholic Church. Just sit down with the priest and get your questions answered.

Same for your sister.


72 posted on 04/15/2015 8:05:45 PM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: PJammers

Judas left early. Hopefully you don’t.


73 posted on 04/15/2015 8:06:23 PM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

Grave sin doesn’t exist. All sin is sin to God.


74 posted on 04/15/2015 8:40:08 PM PDT by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: ealgeone

In you denomination you might not differentiate.

But the Catholic Church teaches about mortal (grave) sin and venial sin.

You knew that, didn’t you?


75 posted on 04/15/2015 8:41:56 PM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: metmom; boatbums; caww; presently no screen name; redleghunter; Springfield Reformer; ...
I don’t recall Jesus making any distinction about denominational lines when He served the bread and the wine.

Actually, i think there is a good case for closed communion, to ensure it is only those who are of the Body of Christ are partaking, as the Lord's supper is to show His death by that shared communal meal, as per 1Cor. 11.

And ironically it is Caths who claim to believe in the Real Presence that should be excluded from the Lord's Supper, as they usually have never actually been converted, and i speak from experience, praise God now, and contort the Lord's Supper into a form of endocannibalism, supposing to receive spiritual life via physically eating human flesh, though Platonically explained.

76 posted on 04/15/2015 8:48:17 PM PDT by daniel1212 (Come to the Lord Jesus as a contrite damned+destitute sinner, trust Him to save you, then live 4 Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Mercat

You dutifully advised, perhaps warned. As for the lack of obedience, if that was the case, it is on their head. But do they know the consequences, is my question?

What IS that scripture about those who receive improperly will sleep (death). I can not remember it at the moment.

I guess my question is more toward wondering why Catholics are so stupid today? We know they are so stupid as to present themselves to receive communion outside of the state of grace and that many are complicit in the sin, by their silence, priests and laity alike. It is either cowardice or lack of belief in the Real Presence, I believe.

You did well and exactly what you were suppose to do. Except for the Catholics, they need to know it is mortal sin, if they don’t already know that.

I attended a Mass with a protestant cousin of mine, who was raised Baptist, floated into Episcopalian by way of a marriage and then divorce. I was mortified when she rose to receive communion. I immediately whispered to her that she could not receive communion. She kept moving along, and said, “Oh yes, I can receive as an Episcopalian”. We had quite a conversation after the Mass.

I explained that even I as a Catholic can not receive without confession and absolution and that wherever she had heard such a thing was more than misinformed, that we are looking at minimum to the sin of presumption, and at worst, mortal sin.

It is time for all of us to stand up and defend the faith, before the Church in the USA turns into gauze entirely. That is the path we are on. If we know better and fail to speak, we are on the broad road to Hell. imho. Lord have Mercy. Thanks for your story. We pray for ourselves and our children for salvation, appealing to His Mercy while it lasts.


77 posted on 04/15/2015 9:24:51 PM PDT by RitaOK ( VIVA CRISTO REY / Public education is the farm team for more Marxists coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK
I can’t help but wonder what your practicing mother has to say, to your lapsed Catholic sister and the protestant brother-in-law, about the dangers to the soul, for receiving our Lord when entirely outside of a state of grace and from outside the Church.

So we get back to the teaching that there is no salvation outside the Catholic church, which makes salvation contingent on works.

78 posted on 04/16/2015 12:54:15 AM PDT by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: ealgeone
Wow....and here I was thinking Communion was open to anyone who professed faith in Christ as it is a remembrance of Him.

It is in any church I've ever attended.

Because the critical point is Christ, not whether you're a member (in good standing of course) of that denomination

79 posted on 04/16/2015 1:02:30 AM PDT by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet; Alex Murphy; bkaycee; blue-duncan; boatbums; caww; CynicalBear; daniel1212; Gamecock; ...
A “baby-killer” or sodomite, if they claim to be Catholic, could have went to confession and confessed this sin and told God they would never again partake in this sin, they are absolved of this sin. That is the reason they would receive communion. Now if this baby-killer or sodomite is practicing this sin, or if these same persons are politicians that believe in these sins and promote these sins, THEY HAVE EXCOMMUNICATED THEMSELVES and if they present themselves for communion GOD KNOWS they are committing a mortal sin by partaking in Holy Communion.

So the church would prevent someone who is a sodomite or baby killer from receiving communion, but they don't do anything about preventing sodomites from consecrating the eucharist and SERVING communion after partaking of it themselves.

So who knew that a priest who ex-communicated himself with a sodomite lifestyle is still worthy to disperse communion all the while standing in a place of being able to decide that someone else isn't worthy.

What hypocrisy.

Must be nice to be part of the protected elite class.

80 posted on 04/16/2015 1:08:01 AM PDT by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-151 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson