Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Catholic Apologetics: Non-Catholics in the Communion Line
Catholic Answers ^ | April 15, 2015 | Michelle Arnold

Posted on 04/15/2015 1:38:52 PM PDT by NYer

There are usually a few Masses per year at which there can be expected to be a large number of non-Catholics present. Christmas and Easter Masses are popular with non-Catholics, mainly because they are visiting Catholic family and friends. Nuptial Masses, especially when one of the parties to be married is a non-Catholic Christian, will have large turnouts of non-Catholics (sometimes up to half the congregation). Non-Catholics can also be expected at Masses offered for other sacramental firsts and life-cycle events, such as confirmations and funerals.

This reality raises a common question for the apologists here at Catholic Answers: What should happen at Communion time? Here's a recent question I received on the issue.

At my granddaughter's First Communion, the priest announced that if there were any Episcopalians present they could receive Communion because they believe in the Real Presence. Other Protestants could come forward for a blessing. When did the teaching change on receiving Communion? I thought you had to be in full union with Rome. My son-in-law is Protestant and this caused real confusion for us.

In this case, both the priest and the inquirer were mistaken, to some extent, in their respective understandings of the Church's sacramental discipline.

The priest was incorrect that Episcopalians ordinarily may receive Communion at a Catholic Mass. Since Episcopalians do not have valid holy orders, they do not have a valid Communion. The fact that they believe that Jesus is in some way present in the Eucharist does not mean that they fully share Catholic faith in the nature of the Real Presence.

The inquirer also was not entirely correct that those who receive Communion must be "in full union with Rome." Orthodox Christians, and members of a few other Christian churches with valid holy orders and a valid Eucharist, are allowed to receive Communion when attending Catholic Masses. The Guidelines for the Reception of Communion state:

Members of the Orthodox churches, the Assyrian Church of the East, and the Polish National Catholic Church are urged to respect the discipline of their own churches. According to Roman Catholic discipline, the Code of Canon Law does not object to the reception of Communion by Christians of these churches (canon 844 §3).

Occasionally, under special circumstances, a baptized non-Catholic Christian may receive the Eucharist if there is grave need, the Christian "spontaneously asks" for the sacraments, and if he cannot approach his own minister:

Because Catholics believe that the celebration of the Eucharist is a sign of the reality of the oneness of faith, life, and worship, members of those churches with whom we are not yet fully united are ordinarily not admitted to holy Communion. Eucharistic sharing in exceptional circumstances by other Christians requires permission according to the directives of the diocesan bishop and the provisions of canon law (canon 844 §4) [Guidelines].

These guidelines, which are based on canon law, are rather complex and shot through with exceptions to the general principles. That can make it difficult for clergy and laity alike to offer blanket guidelines for reception of Communion when non-Catholics are present at a Catholic Mass.

And, all too often, off-the-cuff announcements made by the presider at Mass, usually right before Communion is distributed, do not accurately reflect the Church's discipline on reception of the Eucharist. It may be more common these days to hear a variant of the announcement quoted earlier, inviting "all who believe in the Real Presence of Christ in the Eucharist" to receive Communion, but the less-common announcement that "Communion is reserved to practicing Catholics in a state of grace" also is problematic.

What can be done? Here are a few suggestions for clergy and laity alike.

Learn the guidelines. I trust that clergy are fully instructed in the guidelines for reception of the sacraments while in seminary. But because the guidelines are not easily boiled down to either "Come one, come all" or "Practicing Catholics only!" then I can only suggest regular reading of the USCCB's Guidelines and the relevant section from canon law (canon 844). We have looked at the USCCB's summary; here is canon 844:

§1 Catholic ministers may lawfully administer the sacraments only to Catholic members of Christ's faithful, who equally may lawfully receive them only from Catholic ministers, except as provided in §2, 3, and 4 of this canon and in canon 861 §2.

§2 Whenever necessity requires or a genuine spiritual advantage commends it, and provided the danger of error or indifferentism is avoided, Christ's faithful for whom it is physically or morally impossible to approach a Catholic minister, may lawfully receive the sacraments of penance, the Eucharist, and anointing of the sick from non-Catholic ministers in whose churches these sacraments are valid [emphasis added].

§3 Catholic ministers may lawfully administer the sacraments of penance, the Eucharist, and anointing of the sick to members of the Eastern churches not in full communion with the Catholic Church, if they spontaneously ask for them and are properly disposed. The same applies to members of other churches which the Apostolic See judges to be in the same position as the aforesaid Eastern churches so far as the sacraments are concerned.

§4 If there is a danger of death or if, in the judgement of the diocesan bishop or of the episcopal conference, there is some other grave and pressing need, Catholic ministers may lawfully administer these same sacraments to other Christians not in full communion with the Catholic Church, who cannot approach a minister of their own community and who spontaneously ask for them, provided that they demonstrate the Catholic faith in respect of these sacraments and are properly disposed [emphasis added].

§5 In respect of the cases dealt with in §2, 3, and 4, the diocesan bishop or the episcopal conference is not to issue general norms except after consultation with the competent authority, at least at the local level, of the non-Catholic church or community concerned.

Given the importance of access to the sacraments by all those duly permitted and properly disposed to receive them, Catholic and non-Catholic alike, I do not think it is unreasonable to recommend that priests and deacons memorize this canon and the USCCB's Guidelines. Or, if memorization is impossible, clergy can print out both the canon and the Guidelines on the front and back of a laminated card and keep it on their person at all times, as police officers do with The Miranda Warning.

Publish the guidelines. The missalettes used in many American Catholic parishes often print the USCCB's Guidelines, usually on the inside front cover. If a parish uses a missalette that has the USCCB's Guidelines available, great. If not, then contact the USCCB and request permission to reprint the Guidelines onto card stock to create a sturdy insert that can be placed inside all of the parish's missalettes. Extras can be placed in the parish's literature racks.

Promote the guidelines. Once a parish has determined where its copies of the Guidelines are—whether they are already printed in the parish missalettes or are printed by the parish on card stock and placed in the missalettes—the parish can create a plan of action for promoting the Guidelines at liturgies where non-Catholics are expected to be present. For example, a regular announcement before Masses offered at Christmas, Easter, and for weddings and funerals can be to direct the congregation's attention to the Guidelines and ask the congregation to read the Guidelines before the liturgy begins. For example:

Before we begin, we would like to direct your attention to the Guidelines for Reception of Communion, which can be found on the inside front-cover of the missalettes placed in the pew pockets in front of you. Please take a moment to read the Guidelines so that you may properly discern whether or not you are able to receive Communion during this liturgy. We welcome all who are unable to receive Communion to offer silent prayer or personal reflection during the Rite of Communion.

Nota bene: The announcement suggested here (my own wording, which may be revised appropriately at the discretion of clergy) is not an open call to receive Communion, nor does it make assumptions about who is properly disposed to receive. It simply directs all present to read the Church's guidelines for receiving Communion and to discern their own preparedness for reception. No assumptions are made about the personal religious convictions of those visiting, some of whom may either not be comfortable praying in common with Christians or may not even be theists (which is why the invitation to "personal reflection" is extended).

When the Church's guidelines are not heeded

Despite all of these precautions, there may be times when someone who in not properly disposed to receive Communion receives Communion anyway. It is more likely that a layperson will notice this than will a member of the clergy.

Clergy have the authority to counsel people not to receive Communion; laypersons have the authority to make the guidelines for receiving Communion known. In a previous blog post, I offered these suggestions to laity concerned about the proper reception of Communion by non-practicing Catholics or non-Catholics:

Bottom line: We must accept that human persons have free will, and may freely choose to use it either positively or negatively. We can offer information. When we have the authority to do so, we can counsel accordingly. In a few individual cases, it may be that ecclesial authorities can take more drastic steps to protect the Blessed Sacrament from unworthy reception.

But there is only so much we can do to inform, counsel, and instruct. In the end, ultimate responsibility for worthy reception of Communion belongs to the individual communicant. We can trust that God knows that communicant's mind and heart, and that he will respond to that person accordingly.

In order that this judgment [by the Lord] be favorable or rather that I be not judged at all, I want to be charitable in my thoughts toward others at all times, for Jesus has said, "Judge not, and you shall not be judged" (St. Therese of Lisieux).



TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; Religion & Culture; Worship
KEYWORDS: catholicanswers; catholicapologetics; communionline; holycommunion; michellearnold; noncatholics; wannabecatholics
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-151 next last
To: NYer

Praise be to God, I do not follow man made traditions but rather read Gods word and have communion with other followers of Christ in remembrance of Jesus and His sacrifice for us.


21 posted on 04/15/2015 2:37:34 PM PDT by ThisLittleLightofMine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: longfellowsmuse

As a follower of Christ, my conscience would not allow me to go to mass or participate in catholic communion however is it rather mocking of you to believe that Christians do not take communion seriously.


22 posted on 04/15/2015 2:42:00 PM PDT by ThisLittleLightofMine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: fwdude
Staunch rules, which is good. A sharp delineation between Catholic and non-Catholic is critical.

But this is the point of my earlier post. There are no such "staunch rules" or "sharp delineation" between Catholic and non-Catholic anymore. The Church once taught that non-Catholics MUST repent of their errors before receiving communion. No longer.

However, how about denying communion to baby-killers and sodomites in your ranks, even though “Catholic?”

And I believe the slippery slope already introduced in Canon 844 of the 1983 Code is partly to blame for this. It is also why I would not be surprised when the divorced and remarried join their ranks in the reception of Holy Communion.

23 posted on 04/15/2015 2:47:44 PM PDT by piusv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: fwdude; Legatus
When he was head of the Apostolic Signatura (top canonical judge, Catholic equivalent of Supreme Court) Cardinal Raymond Burke ruled definitively, clearly, elaborately, forcefully, that public, manifest, unrepentant pro-aborts and suchlike, if they approach for Communion, are to be denied.

Burke is no longer with the Apostolic Signature, and even when he was, most bishops/priests ignored this, and there was no way to monitor actual practice or force compliance. In other words, without active promotion, active discipline, unequivocal backing from the Chair of Peter, it was a dead letter.

However, the ruling is still there. It has never been overturned. The bishops are outlaws, I am sorry to say.

24 posted on 04/15/2015 2:49:17 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o ("The floor of hell is paved with the skulls of bishops." - St. John Chrysostom, Bishop)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o
The bishops are outlaws, I am sorry to say.

Doesn't that put them in de-facto schism? Seriously, if they're outlaws they're rebels, what makes them more legit than (for instance) SSPX bishops? It is all a legal fiction where we pretend to ignore the heretical elephant in the room? I know, I know, the elephant is actually schismatic but I think he's an heretic too.

We talk about automatic-excommunication for pro abort pols that isn't enforced, is there a situation of automatic-excommunication for bishops who are no longer (in any reasonable use of the term) in communion with the bishop of Rome?

I realize this basically plunges us into a state of anarchy in the Church but isn't that really what's going on anyhow?

25 posted on 04/15/2015 3:03:37 PM PDT by Legatus (I think, therefore you're out of your mind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: PJammers
Judas was at the last supper.

But left before the institution of the Lord's Supper. Matt 26:24-26

26 posted on 04/15/2015 3:04:23 PM PDT by xone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ThisLittleLightofMine

Perhaps you misunderstand my meaning. I am merely referring to non Catholics who receive Catholic holy communion, not those who belong to churches who hold different beliefs.


27 posted on 04/15/2015 3:06:59 PM PDT by longfellowsmuse (last of the living nomads)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

A “baby-killer” or sodomite, if they claim to be Catholic, could have went to confession and confessed this sin and told God they would never again partake in this sin, they are absolved of this sin. That is the reason they would receive communion. Now if this baby-killer or sodomite is practicing this sin, or if these same persons are politicians that believe in these sins and promote these sins, THEY HAVE EXCOMMUNICATED THEMSELVES and if they present themselves for communion GOD KNOWS they are committing a mortal sin by partaking in Holy Communion.


28 posted on 04/15/2015 3:12:33 PM PDT by NKP_Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: longfellowsmuse

“Incidentally many Catholics do this when they feel they are not in a state of grace to receive”.

If I am not in a state of grace I never go up for communion and that includes for a blessing, which to me is outrageous for an adult Catholic. I know when I’m not in a state of grace. I just wish some of my fellow Catholics knew the same thing. But I am not responsible for the state of their souls. They are.


29 posted on 04/15/2015 3:19:21 PM PDT by NKP_Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: fwdude; Legatus; DuncanWaring
However, how about denying communion to baby-killers and sodomites in your ranks, even though “Catholic?”

What about them? Who are they? How does one recognize them in the long line of communicants? What if the individual went to confession prior to the mass? How is that information communicated to the priest or EMHC distributing communion?

Only God can read the hearts of man. You will find your answer in Scripture. In 1 Corinthian 11:27, Paul says that eating or drinking in an unworthy manner is equivalent to profaning (literally, murdering) the Body and Blood of the Lord. In the same Chapter of 1 Corinthians, Paul continues by saying, ""For all who eat and drink without discerning the body, eat and drink judgment against tehmselves. For this reason many of you are weak and ill, and some have died." [1 Cor. 11:29-30] In other words, those who receive the Sacrament of the Holy Eucharist in an unworthy manner, in a state of mortal sin, they can expect to be punished by God by illness or death.

30 posted on 04/15/2015 3:19:22 PM PDT by NYer ("You are a puff of smoke that appears briefly and then disappears." James 4:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

“The bishops are outlaws, I am sorry to say”.

Heretics is a better word.


31 posted on 04/15/2015 3:21:28 PM PDT by NKP_Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: NYer

If they are public sinners like pro-abort politicians they must make their change of heart public.


32 posted on 04/15/2015 3:21:31 PM PDT by piusv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

“Heretic” has become a dirty word.


33 posted on 04/15/2015 3:22:26 PM PDT by piusv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: NYer
Who are they?

They're usually the people who have obama bumper stickers on their cars in the parish parking lot. Either that or they're a member of the US Congress.

34 posted on 04/15/2015 3:25:41 PM PDT by Legatus (I think, therefore you're out of your mind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

I do not find it outrageous to receive a blessing from a priest when not in a sufficient state to receive communion. Christ blessed sinners all the time. That being said the sacrament of reconciliation is seriously underutilized.


35 posted on 04/15/2015 3:27:32 PM PDT by longfellowsmuse (last of the living nomads)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Legatus
Doesn't that put [bishops who refuse to excommunicate pro-abort pols] in de-facto schism? Seriously, if they're outlaws they're rebels, what makes them more legit than (for instance) SSPX bishops? It is all a legal fiction where we pretend to ignore the heretical elephant in the room? I know, I know, the elephant is actually schismatic but I think he's an heretic too.

We talk about automatic-excommunication for pro abort pols that isn't enforced, is there a situation of automatic-excommunication for bishops who are no longer (in any reasonable use of the term) in communion with the bishop of Rome? I realize this basically plunges us into a state of anarchy in the Church but isn't that really what's going on anyhow?

I don't see any way around it. What percentage of the Catholic Church is actually in schism?

36 posted on 04/15/2015 3:30:28 PM PDT by Alex Murphy (n)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Legatus
Canonically I don't know how to answer your question.

I mean it is wrong, sinful, scandalous, damaging, demoralizing, shameful, for bishops to basically blow off canon law (and they've been doing it for decades), but I don't know if it is precisely schismatic.

The split between doctrine and "pastoral practice" is always corrupt. To say that they may be split is heresy in itself.

Cardinal Kasper recently said that no matter what the upcoming 2015 Synod says about divorce/remarriage, and no matter how the Pope rules, the German Hierarchy will do what they think is best, regardless.

In a perverse way, that is encouraging, because it means Kasper realizes the Synod is not going to endorse his most mushiful ideas. But if he can get away with saying, "Germany will go her own way" and not get much response (so far) other than raised eyebrows, we're in a bad, bad way.

Watch and pray. I mean pray.

37 posted on 04/15/2015 3:31:32 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o ("The floor of hell is paved with the skulls of bishops." - St. John Chrysostom, Bishop)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: longfellowsmuse

Judas’ heart and actions were known by Jesus. None of the other Apostles knew about him until it was revealed.


38 posted on 04/15/2015 3:32:03 PM PDT by PJammers (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: NYer

This is a question that pops up in the Orthodox Church from time to time since we also restrict Communion. The way it is handled at my old parish was that a note was put in the bulletin “Can I receive Holy Communion?” with an appropriate explanation of the rule. Additionally when the priest stepped through the Royal Doors with the chalice he would always make a short statement to the effect that while we all long for Christian unity, at present that unity does not exist and that only baptized and chrismated Orthodox Christians, who have prepared themselves through fasting, prayer and recent confession could partake of the Holy Mysteries of the altar.

And lastly anyone not known to the priest who approaches the chalice is likely to get the third degree...

Are you Orthodox?
Have you kept the fast?
When is the last time you went to confession.

The correct answers are yes, yes and within the last 24 hours.


39 posted on 04/15/2015 3:35:39 PM PDT by NRx (An unrepentant champion of the old order and determined foe of damnable Whiggery in all its forms.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle
I am a lapsed Catholic, but respect the church's rules on communion when I attend a mass with my mother; that is, I abstain from communion.

Steve, I understand perfectly! Like you, I too absented myself from the Church and the Sacraments for a long time. Ironically, it was a young boy who brought me back when he asked me to be his sponsor for Confirmation. I still vividly recall that day. Walking into the church and watching the procession of confirmandi, attending the Mass and listening to the bishop's homily, all touched my heart profoundly. So much so that I did not want the event to end.

Last Sunday, the front pews in our church were filled with an extended family we had never seen before. The priest welcomed them to the church and explained they had had brought a baby to be baptized. The family members were dressed for a celebration but it soon became obvious that they were unfamiliar with the Mass - they did not even know the Lord's Prayer. When it was time for communion all, except for one young woman, went up to receive. I doubt any one of them was familiar with Paul's admonition in 1 Corinthian 11:27. However, the one young woman, though cajoled by the family, understood that she should not approach.

Steve, whatever obstacle is still holding you back from returning to the Catholic Church, I would encourage you to visit that link and try to resolve it. Pope Francis has declared a Jubilee Year of Mercy, to welcome back the lost sheep. I have added you to my daily prayer list.

40 posted on 04/15/2015 3:36:29 PM PDT by NYer ("You are a puff of smoke that appears briefly and then disappears." James 4:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-151 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson