A “baby-killer” or sodomite, if they claim to be Catholic, could have went to confession and confessed this sin and told God they would never again partake in this sin, they are absolved of this sin. That is the reason they would receive communion. Now if this baby-killer or sodomite is practicing this sin, or if these same persons are politicians that believe in these sins and promote these sins, THEY HAVE EXCOMMUNICATED THEMSELVES and if they present themselves for communion GOD KNOWS they are committing a mortal sin by partaking in Holy Communion.
“Now if this baby-killer or sodomite is practicing this sin, or if these same persons are politicians that believe in these sins and promote these sins, THEY HAVE EXCOMMUNICATED THEMSELVES and if they present themselves for communion GOD KNOWS they are committing a mortal sin by partaking in Holy Communion.”
But didn’t the sodomites and baby-killers commit mortal sins when they killed babies and sodomitted 8in the first place? So does it really make any difference if they commit a second mortal sin by partaking in Holy Communion? And which of those mortal sins is the worst anyway, Holy Communion, or baby-killing, or sodomitting?
So the church would prevent someone who is a sodomite or baby killer from receiving communion, but they don't do anything about preventing sodomites from consecrating the eucharist and SERVING communion after partaking of it themselves.
So who knew that a priest who ex-communicated himself with a sodomite lifestyle is still worthy to disperse communion all the while standing in a place of being able to decide that someone else isn't worthy.
What hypocrisy.
Must be nice to be part of the protected elite class.