Posted on 04/10/2015 6:19:36 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o
The argument that divorced and civilly remarried Catholics (lacking annulments) be allowed to receive the Eucharist is kind of like 40+ year-old, re-heated mashed potatoes: it’s been spit out by the authority of Church time and again, but for some reason keeps appearing on the spoon of stubborn theologians and bishops who keep trying to trick us into eating it by making cutesie airplane noises.
In an essay for Communio entitled “The Merciful Gift Of Indissolubility and the Question Of Pastoral Care For Civilly Divorced And Remarried Catholics”, Nicholas J. Healy, JR. traces the history of this argument, as well as four of the main times the Church has lovingly but resoundingly shut it down. I’ve listed my findings from the document below in order to provide some context for this issue that’s sure to arise once again at the October 2015 Synod on the Family.
1. 1965 and Vatican II:
The argument for allowing communion in certain circumstances to divorced and remarried Catholics can be traced back, at least in recent history, to the fourth session of the Second Vatican Council. Archbishop Elias Zoghby, the patriarchal vicar of the Melkites in Egypt, proposed that the Eastern practice of tolerating remarriage in certain cases should be considered. Even though Zobhby triggered a swift and negative response, dissenters still use this instance as an example in their favor.
Shut down by Pope Paul VI: "... the Church has no authority to change what is of divine law."
At the request of Pope Paul VI, all normal activities of the Council were suspended until the proposal was addressed. Cardinal Journet was asked by the Pope to respond to Zoghby, and citing Mk 10:2 and 1 Cor 7:10–11, he concluded that “the teaching of the Catholic Church on the indissolubility of sacramental marriage is the very teaching of the Lord Jesus that has been revealed to us and has always been safeguarded and proclaimed in the Church . . . the Church has no authority to change what is of divine law.”
2. 1970s: Dissent from Catholic Theological Society
Despite the Church’s response at the Second Vatican Council, the 1970s saw a barrage of publications from Catholic theologians and bishops advocating for a change in Church teaching, particularly in the United States and in Germany. In 1972, a study committee commissioned by the Catholic Theological Society of America issued an “Interim Pastoral Statement” on “The Problem of Second Marriages,” arguing that not only should the divorced and remarried be admitted back to the sacraments, but that the Church needed to rethink and redefine the very ideas of consummation and indissolubility. That same year in Germany, several prominent bishops and theologians such as Schnackenburg, Ratzinger*, Lehmann, and Böckle wrote volumes on the matter, arguing for leniency in certain circumstances similar to practices in the Orthodox Church (called oikonomia, which roughly translates to “stewardship” or “management of a household”).
*Cardinal Ratzinger, now Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI, officially retracted his support of communion for the divorced and remarried in a letter published in The Tablet in 1991, and has several times since voiced his support for Church teaching as expressed in “Familiaris Consortio”.
The Church holds a Synod on the Family in 1980, as divorces were on the rise throughout the world. The result of the 1980 Synod was Pope John Paul II’s 1981 apostolic exhortation “Familiaris Consortio” (roughly, “Of Family Partnership”), which contains beautiful reflections on the role of the family in God’s divine plan, and specifically includes a section about irregular situations. Addressing the situation of the divorced and civilly remarried, Pope John Paul II says the following:
Together with the Synod, I earnestly call upon pastors and the whole community of the faithful to help the divorced, and with solicitous care to make sure that they do not consider themselves as separated from the Church, for as baptized persons they can, and indeed must, share in her life. They should be encouraged to listen to the word of God, to attend the Sacrifice of the Mass, to persevere in prayer, to contribute to works of charity and to community efforts in favor of justice, to bring up their children in the Christian faith, to cultivate the spirit and practice of penance and thus implore, day by day, God’s grace. Let the Church pray for them, encourage them and show herself a merciful mother, and thus sustain them in faith and hope.
However, the Church reaffirms her practice, which is based upon Sacred Scripture, of not admitting to Eucharistic Communion divorced persons who have remarried. They are unable to be admitted thereto from the fact that their state and condition of life objectively contradict that union of love between Christ and the Church which is signified and effected by the Eucharist. Besides this, there is another special pastoral reason: if these people were admitted to the Eucharist, the faithful would be led into error and confusion regarding the Church’s teaching about the indissolubility of marriage.
Shut down by Pope John Paul II: "...the Church reaffirms her practice, which is based upon Sacred Scripture,"
The Church holds a Synod on the Family in 1980, as divorces were on the rise throughout the world. The result of the 1980 Synod was Pope John Paul II’s 1981 apostolic exhortation “Familiaris Consortio” (roughly, “Of Family Partnership”), which contains beautiful reflections on the role of the family in God’s divine plan, and specifically includes a section about irregular situations. Addressing the situation of the divorced and civilly remarried, Pope John Paul II says the following:
Together with the Synod, I earnestly call upon pastors and the whole community of the faithful to help the divorced, and with solicitous care to make sure that they do not consider themselves as separated from the Church, for as baptized persons they can, and indeed must, share in her life. They should be encouraged to listen to the word of God, to attend the Sacrifice of the Mass, to persevere in prayer, to contribute to works of charity and to community efforts in favor of justice, to bring up their children in the Christian faith, to cultivate the spirit and practice of penance and thus implore, day by day, God’s grace. Let the Church pray for them, encourage them and show herself a merciful mother, and thus sustain them in faith and hope.
However, the Church reaffirms her practice, which is based upon Sacred Scripture, of not admitting to Eucharistic Communion divorced persons who have remarried. They are unable to be admitted thereto from the fact that their state and condition of life objectively contradict that union of love between Christ and the Church which is signified and effected by the Eucharist. Besides this, there is another special pastoral reason: if these people were admitted to the Eucharist, the faithful would be led into error and confusion regarding the Church’s teaching about the indissolubility of marriage.
3. 1993: Dissent from German theologians
Three prominent German bishops, Oskar Saier, Walter Kasper, and Karl Lehmann, publish a letter in 1993 on pastoral care for the divorced and remarried, essentially saying that while what Pope John Paul II said in Familiaris Consortio is very nice and generally true, it can’t possibly apply to every difficult situation that arises. These bishops then proposed their own guide for divorced and remarried Catholics to determine their worthiness for the sacraments, as guided by a pastor. There were three conditions the German bishops laid out for the possibility of communion: the individuals should be repentant for the failure of the first marriage; the second civil marriage has to “prove itself over time as stable”; and the “commitments assumed in the second marriage have to be accepted.” Under these conditions, the bishops argued, civilly remarried people could in good conscience receive the Eucharist without the need to live continently.
Shut it down: In 1994, The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith reaaffirms Catholic teaching
The CDF (Congregation n the Doctrine of the Faith) in 1994 issued an indirect response to the German bishops in the “Letter Concerning Communion”, which said church teaching “cannot be modified for difficult situations.” While it never mentioned the letter from the German bishops, it was clearly written in response to it. The Congregation’s letter cited passages from Scripture, Familiaris Consortio, and the Catechism of the Catholic Church to support Church teaching, and addressed false notions of conscience that would allow individuals to determine for themselves whether or not their first marriage was valid.
4. 1994-2005: Various bishops continue call to re-open the discussion
Literature published by various bishops and theologians still showed a tendency to stray from Pope John Paul II’s teaching in “Familiaris Consortio”, leading the Church to call for a Synod on the Eucharist in 2005, during which the issue was studied and addressed extensively.
Shut it down: Pope Benedict XVI - Sacamentus Caritatus
Pope Benedict XVI issued a post-Synod apostolic exhortation called “Sacramentum Caritatis”, in which he confirmed Church doctrine and practice. He also called for a deeper theological understanding of the relationship between the sacrament of marriage and the sacrament of the and the sacrament of the Eucharist, and asked for better pastoral efforts in the area of marriage preparation for young people.
There are two important things to remember when considering this issue. The first is that the pain and separation felt by divorced and remarried Catholics is real, and the exhortation of the recent Popes to reach out to these people in the Church should be taken seriously by clergy and lay faithful alike. The second thing to remember is that while the pain of the divorced and remarried is a serious issue, it is not the only important and pressing issue in the Church at the moment, with thousands of Christians fleeing their homes or being slaughtered at the hands of Islamic extremists both in the Middle East and Africa.
Shut it down: the Holy Spirit will move, as He always has, to protect Catholic doctrine and unity
Still, because the issue continues to arise, the Synod Fathers will address it at the Synod on the Family later this year, and Pope Francis will write an apostolic exhortation on the matter some time after that. Let us continue to pray for all in Church leadership, and that those in authority have the courage to trust that the Holy Spirit will shut it down, as he has always done when erroneous proposals threaten Church doctrine and unity.
This author, Mary Rezac, points out that there have already been FOUR major pushes in the past 50 years --- since the Second Vatican Council --- to get the Catholic Church to abandon Her constant teaching on Marriage and the Eucharist. Interesting that, although the dissenters have been ever-more-decisively "shut down" by Popes Paul V, John Paul II, and Benedict XVI, they never quite give up: they always come back demanding more argument, more "dialogue," more wiggle-room, couched as "pastoral practice."
Will Pope Francis will remain steady on doctrine? I think he will and must. That's the good news.
The bad news is that the dissenters probably know they can't formally change doctrine. Their strategy, at this point, will probably be to nod and mumble through any restatement of sound doctrine, BUT claim the liberty to adopt "pastoral practices" not in conformity with the doctrine. Cardinal Walter Kasper will pour on the smooth, buttery bafflegab on this "German Solution" strategy.
At 82, let's hope this will be his last bafflegab.
Oremus. Watch and pray.
I agree. I married a Jewish man, so no communion for me. I accept that. I have gone to church every morning this week at different parishes, and also participated in the Adoration of the Eucharist today. I want to keep the Catholic church and my faith strong.
May this synod be the 5th time!
“the Church”? You mean Ekklesia ?
Thank you for posting this. My faith has been weak as of late in trusting the Holy Spirit to protect the Church from error under this pope.
Unless you or your husband were previously married (or are incestuously related), I believe that you may still be able to receive a dispensation to regularize your marriage. I would recommend you discuss this with a knowledgeable priest.
So... only Catholics like the Kennedys who can pay huge amounts of to the Church for an “annulment” can get remarried.
Sorta like selling “indulgences.”
Shut down by Paul VI.
Shut down by JP II.
Shut down by Benedict XVI.
And now being pushed by Francis.
Sorry, I’m not getting this, communion is between you and God, no one else.
Not true.
Where do you get these faulty ideas?
Where do you think? Perhaps it's from the same Church that reversed a Kennedy annulment.
Yes, my husband was previously married and had children. But before that we were college sweethearts, and I never married, until he came back to me. He attended church with me on Easter, but he does not accept Jesus.
Thank-you for your concern. Happy Easter!
Are you not concerned about your husband’s salvation?
I think you have hit on something useful. Instead of avoiding the bishop of the Tucson diocese, as I have, and not being fully there when it comes to blessing the pope during Mass, I should beseech the Holy Spirit to bring this pope wisdom and pray a better more committed Catholic pope is waiting in the wings soon to strengthen the foundation of His church.
I’m not a Catholic....
But, if that’s the churches doctrine then why do so many wish to change it. The church says “no communion for non-annulled and remarried”. Accept it an move on or stop being a catholic.
Those are your choices. I support the church in their initiatives to keep married couples..married. If they relent on this, then it changes the whole culture of what the church advocates. I respect the Catholic Church for sticking to it’s guns on these sorts of issues.
If you want to be a catholic, then be a catholic. Own it...all the way. If you can’t, then don’t be a catholic. Seems kind of simple.
We pray together twice a day. It is a constant concern.
I wish you well.
Yeah crazy stuff. Remarried? Burn in hell. Abortion supporting liberal, salvation..
Did you have ham for Easter dinner?
(Sorry, couldn't help myself)
Given the terrible problems your denomination is having with its leadership, denying the Lord’s Supper to individuals who want to seek God seems the least of your problems...
As an example...
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/3218873/posts
There are many more I could post. Those seem far more important issues, that if not changed will end what is left of the Roman Denomination.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.