The difference her is there were no services received. It was a donation to a supposed church.
As an American, I’m more predisposed to calling Islam a “supposed religion” than I am for some self-identified Christian church, frankly. If it is a scam church, then they likely have their books in order, and a lawyer on staff, to boot.
I don’t care, really. The money this crook took is gone or has been recovered to the extent that it can and this government is just flexing its unlegalized power. If it is stolen, PROVE it. If was received illegally, PROVE it.
Otherwise, they can take a hike and go find a DA and a judge and set a trial. We’ve all heard the government can indict a ham sandwich....do it or STFU.
“The difference her is there were no services received.”
That’s nonsense.
“It was a donation to a supposed church.”
Your bias Is clouding your reasoning.