You cited SR Maitland, a Protestant Church historian of the early 19th century. He summed up Protestant anti-Catholic stupidity over the “They had no Bibles in the vernacular in the Middle Ages” this way:
Did they know anything about The Bible?
I believe that the idea which many persons [in Protestant England in the 19th century] have of ecclesiastical history may be briefly stated thus: that the Christian church was a small, scattered, and persecuted flock, until the time of Constantine; that then, at once, and as if by magic, the Roman world became Christian; that this Universal Christianity, not being of a very pure, solid, or durable nature, melted down into a filthy mass called Popery, which held its place during the dark ages, until the revival of Pagan literature, and the consequent march of intellect, sharpened men’s wits and brought about the Reformation; when it was discovered that the pope was Antichrist, and that the saints had been in the hands of the little horn predicted by the prophet Daniel for hundreds of years without knowing so awful a fact, or suspecting anything of the kind. How much of this is true, and how much false, this is not the place to inquire; but I feel bound to refer to this opinion, because the necessity of describing the church during the kingdom of the Beast in such a way as scarcely to admit of her visible existence, even when it has not led popular writers on the prophecies to falsify history, has at least prepared their readers to acquiesce without surprise or inquiry in very partial and delusive statements.”
Maitland knew many of his fellow Protestants were stupid, ignorant, mean-spirited anti-Catholics who continued to dwell in their own self-made ‘dark ages’ of Protestant fostered ignorance (Protestant and ignorance in that sense are redundant terms). Hence, he wrote The Dark Ages; a series of essays intended to illustrate the state of religion and literature in the ninth, tenth, eleventh and twelfth centuries. The quote is on page 188 or 189.
This by the way is what he goes on to say in answer to his own question:
To come, however, to the question,—did people in the dark ages know anything of the Bible? Certainly it was not as commonly known and as generally in the hands of men as it is now, and has been almost ever since the invention of printing. I beg the reader not to suspect me of wishing to maintain any such absurd opinion; but I do think that there is sufficient evidence—(I.) that during that period the scriptures were more accessible to those who could use them; (II.) were in fact more used—and (III.) by a greater number of persons—than some modern writers would lead us to suppose.
To come, however, to the PRESENT,—do people in the MSM age know anything of the Bible?