Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: HiTech RedNeck
The Shroud picture looks closer to church art than it does to what we would expect of a realistic human. Perhaps it never was God’s idea to leave behind a realistic picture, only a piece of obvious artwork.

On the contrary, it has been examined by experts in human anatomy. . . as well as experts in art. It is not a work of art. It is quite realistic and in fact is a 3D terrain map of a human being. It is perfect in every detail. There is nothing artistic about it. It is not even a photograph as some have called it. It shows no light artifacting at all. This is only the most researched object in science and artistic scholarship in the last 117 years.

43 posted on 02/28/2015 6:47:13 PM PST by Swordmaker (This tag line is a Microsoft insult free zone... but if the insults to Mac users contnue...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: Swordmaker

Except that it makes Jesus look “totally tubular.” The scriptures say he was no looker, but an exact look like this would have gotten him a distinct reputation as an odd ball, and middling on the “stature” scale to boot.

God wanted no idolaters and therefore didn’t give us any exact picture of Jesus. An anatomically exact portrayal of something that is stylized in the beginning doesn’t say anything.


48 posted on 02/28/2015 9:34:00 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson